Sizing up the NHL
Following up on a look at the average age of NHL teams, here's a look at the average weight of the 30 teams through the first two weeks of the season:
| Team | Weight | |
| 1 | SJS | 213.5 |
| 2 | OTT | 212.2 |
| 3 | TBL | 209.1 |
| 4 | MTL | 208.4 |
| 5 | EDM | 207.8 |
| 6 | LAK | 207.6 |
| 7 | PHX | 207.0 |
| 8 | WSH | 206.6 |
| 9 | ANA | 204.6 |
| 10 | CBJ | 204.6 |
| 11 | CGY | 204.4 |
| 12 | FLA | 204.1 |
| 13 | NYR | 203.8 |
| 14 | MIN | 203.6 |
| 15 | VAN | 203.3 |
| 16 | CHI | 202.8 |
| 17 | NJD | 202.5 |
| 18 | PIT | 202.3 |
| 19 | ATL | 201.4 |
| 20 | COL | 201.2 |
| 21 | TOR | 200.8 |
| 22 | NSH | 200.7 |
| 23 | BUF | 200.7 |
| 24 | STL | 200.1 |
| 25 | PHI | 199.9 |
| 26 | CAR | 199.8 |
| 27 | DAL | 199.5 |
| 28 | NYI | 198.5 |
| 29 | BOS | 198.4 |
| 30 | DET | 196.8 |
San Jose's been a big team and Detroit a small one for a few years now, but there are some surprises in there. Montreal, for instance, ranks far higher than Philadelphia in the size category, at least based on average weight. And young teams like Los Angeles and Phoenix have terrific size as well.
What follows is a look at this data (and the age data) based on breaking it down into forwards and defencemen. First, the blueliners:
| Defence | |||||
| Team | Weight | RK | Age | RK | |
| ANA | 206.6 | 17 | 31.0 | 3 | |
| ATL | 200.7 | 28 | 28.3 | 15 | |
| BOS | 208.0 | 16 | 29.1 | 10 | |
| BUF | 203.5 | 25 | 32.1 | 1 | |
| CAR | 209.1 | 14 | 29.0 | 11 | |
| CBJ | 213.5 | 4 | 26.1 | 29 | |
| CGY | 211.1 | 11 | 28.0 | 17 | |
| CHI | 204.3 | 23 | 26.3 | 27 | |
| COL | 206.2 | 18 | 31.5 | 2 | |
| DAL | 208.3 | 15 | 27.0 | 21 | |
| DET | 199.1 | 30 | 30.7 | 4 | |
| EDM | 212.4 | 7 | 29.5 | 7 | |
| FLA | 210.4 | 12 | 29.2 | 9 | |
| LAK | 213.0 | 5 | 26.7 | 23 | |
| MIN | 205.4 | 21 | 28.0 | 16 | |
| MTL | 212.3 | 8 | 30.1 | 5 | |
| NJD | 201.6 | 27 | 28.4 | 14 | |
| NSH | 202.9 | 26 | 26.8 | 22 | |
| NYI | 200.0 | 29 | 27.8 | 18 | |
| NYR | 209.7 | 13 | 27.5 | 20 | |
| OTT | 218.1 | 1 | 29.4 | 8 | |
| PHI | 205.6 | 20 | 26.2 | 28 | |
| PHX | 212.2 | 9 | 27.6 | 19 | |
| PIT | 211.8 | 10 | 28.5 | 13 | |
| SJS | 215.0 | 2 | 29.6 | 6 | |
| STL | 206.1 | 19 | 26.4 | 25 | |
| TBL | 204.9 | 22 | 25.9 | 30 | |
| TOR | 203.6 | 24 | 26.7 | 24 | |
| VAN | 214.3 | 3 | 28.9 | 12 | |
| WSH | 212.6 | 6 | 26.4 | 26 | |
| AVG | 208.1 | 28.3 | |||
I hope all of that's pretty straightforward. Essentially, it says that a team like the Sabres has a defence core that is the oldest in the league and is on the small side, 25th in the NHL, at an average of 203.5 pounds.
On the flipside, Columbus has the second-youngest blueline and one that is the fourth biggest at an average of 213.5 pounds.
The oldest bluelines: Buffalo, Colorado, Anaheim, Detroit, Montreal
The youngest: Tampa Bay, Columbus, Philadelphia, Chicago, Washington
The biggest: Ottawa, San Jose, Vancouver, Columbus, Los Angeles
The smallest: Detroit, N.Y. Islanders, Atlanta, New Jersey, Nashville
And here are the averages for forwards:
| Forwards | |||||
| Team | Weight | RK | Age | RK | |
| ANA | 204.8 | 9 | 30.1 | 2 | |
| ATL | 201.7 | 16 | 28.6 | 8 | |
| BOS | 192.9 | 30 | 26.4 | 25 | |
| BUF | 202.9 | 11 | 26.6 | 23 | |
| CAR | 195.2 | 29 | 28.2 | 12 | |
| CBJ | 202.4 | 14 | 25.7 | 28 | |
| CGY | 202.4 | 13 | 29.0 | 7 | |
| CHI | 201.4 | 18 | 24.0 | 30 | |
| COL | 200.2 | 21 | 29.1 | 5 | |
| DAL | 197.5 | 27 | 27.4 | 16 | |
| DET | 197.9 | 25 | 29.7 | 4 | |
| EDM | 210.2 | 2 | 26.1 | 26 | |
| FLA | 202.9 | 12 | 27.6 | 14 | |
| LAK | 206.1 | 7 | 25.8 | 27 | |
| MIN | 203.6 | 10 | 26.6 | 22 | |
| MTL | 207.6 | 5 | 28.6 | 9 | |
| NJD | 202.0 | 15 | 29.8 | 3 | |
| NSH | 200.4 | 20 | 28.2 | 13 | |
| NYI | 196.7 | 28 | 28.5 | 10 | |
| NYR | 201.6 | 17 | 26.7 | 21 | |
| OTT | 208.5 | 4 | 29.1 | 6 | |
| PHI | 198.6 | 22 | 27.2 | 17 | |
| PHX | 206.7 | 6 | 24.6 | 29 | |
| PIT | 198.6 | 22 | 26.8 | 20 | |
| SJS | 214.6 | 1 | 27.6 | 15 | |
| STL | 197.7 | 26 | 26.5 | 24 | |
| TBL | 209.8 | 3 | 30.3 | 1 | |
| TOR | 200.4 | 19 | 26.9 | 19 | |
| VAN | 198.4 | 24 | 27.0 | 18 | |
| WSH | 205.9 | 8 | 28.3 | 11 | |
| AVG | 202.3 | 27.6 | |||
The oldest forwards: Tampa Bay, Anaheim, New Jersey, Detroit, Colorado
The youngest: Chicago, Phoenix, Columbus, Los Angeles, Edmonton
The biggest: San Jose, Edmonton, Tampa Bay, Ottawa, Montreal
The smallest: Boston, Carolina, N.Y. Islanders, Dallas, St. Louis
Now, I should clarify that this is only among players who have played in at least one game so far this season, so Chris Chelios, for example, isn't being counted on Detroit's blueline. Also, if a player has played one game or six or seven, they're all counted equally in the averaging. Even so, this should give you a good idea of where teams stack up, size and youth wise.
The Bruins, for example, have just three forwards listed over 200 pounds and are just middle of the pack on the blueline despite having 255 pound Zdeno Chara bumping that average way, way up.
The Sharks, meanwhile, are big all over, with only the 195-pound Joe Pavelski under 200 pounds up front, and a pair of 240+ pounders in Doug Murray and Alexei Semenov on the back end.
0 recs |
7 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Even with Keith Tkachunk and Kyle Wellwood, the Blues and Canucks, respectively, are small up front. How ’bout that?
by J.P. on Oct 27, 2008 6:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Only the extremes are really interesting in this stat-breakdown. It would be a lot more interesting to see how much weight they have on the ice on average (and a LOT more work). Like that you could get a more reasonable view on how tough/old the teams are.
And I can’t wait for Foppa to re-sign so the Avs can be the oldest NHL team!
26 Card Jet
by Tommelot on Oct 27, 2008 7:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder how that would change for the Caps, with Federov switching back and forth from forward to defense.
by odessasteps on Oct 27, 2008 11:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Anyone else creeped out by the fact that the Leafs are 24th in age and size overall and 19th for age and weight for forwards? That’s a little too symmetrical for my liking
"I'll take some Cream Pie" - Barack Obama
"THATS WHAT SHE SAID!"
by MapleLeafs85 on Oct 27, 2008 5:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That is weird. Normally weird things make me check for mistakes, but I’m pretty certain the data’s correct here.
by James Mirtle on Oct 27, 2008 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Dandenault being put as a forward or a defensemen for these calculations? I know Brisebois is old, but the Habs do have 3 d-men below the average age on their team, so being 5th oldest seems high. Dandenault would explain that, even though he has played only about 4 periods of D over the past calendar year.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Oct 28, 2008 10:48 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nope, Dandenault’s down as a forward. Brisebois being close to 38 brings their age up, and guys like Markov aren’t exactly spring chickens.
by James Mirtle on Oct 28, 2008 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















