The Incomprehensible Depth of the 2003 NHL Entry Draft
Since the curtain is finally about to fall on this convoluted Sean Avery morality play, I suggest we all take a deep breath and move on to talking about people who can actually play hockey.
Like Jeff Carter.
As this laudatory Philadelphia Inquirer feature reveals, Carter is part of that class of player that Avery detests. He's "soft-spoken," to the point of whispering interview responses. Doesn't talk about his stats. Seems almost embarrassed by his own gifts. In a word: boring.
But put this guy out on the ice, and he's a deadly machine. Pinpoint shot, wicked release, big, fast, intelligent, defensively aware. This is the kind of artistry that the sport and its media should salivate over, instead of the third-tier clownery that Avery has stooped to.
Anyway, there ends my rant. From here, let me instead focus on a quote made by Flyers' GM Paul Holmgren in the aforementioned article: that Carter and his 2003 NHL Draft classmates "may go down as the greatest ever."
It seemed a bit of a gaudy claim to me, until I actually looked at the first round of the '03 Draft. And yea, thereupon gazing, mine eyes began to melt.
I could just list all of the top-tier names from this draft class, but I thought it would be more interesting (and debate-worthy) to draft a starting roster from this daunting group of players.
Twelve forwards, six defensemen, two goalies, with picks based upon who I'd want playing for me right now. Unlike NHL general managers, I don't overpay based on potential. Overall draft positions are listed in parentheses.
Let this fantastically nerdy exercise commence.
---
FORWARD LINES:
Thomas Vanek (5) - Ryan Getzlaf (19) - Corey Perry (28)
Zach Parise (17) - Jeff Carter (11) - Nikolai Zherdev (4)
Milan Michalek (6) - Mike Richards (24) - Nathan Horton (3)
Dustin Brown (13) - Eric Staal (2) - Patrice Bergeron (45)
---
I mean, seriously. Eric Staal's on the fourth line, people. The first round in 2003 featured a stunning array of forward talent, highlighted by the drafting coups that the Getzlaf/Perry and Carter/Richards duos represent.
Elsewhere, Vanek has lived up to his billing as the greatest pure goal scorer of this group. Zherdev is a pure bundle of finesse who seems to finally be hitting his stride in the Big Apple. Parise, MIchalek and Bergeron all have hockey IQs that bound off the charts (not that there's a single dunce in this pack). Brown is a fun mix of scrappiness and scoring.
Staal and Horton are both enduring statistical downturns right now, but they were drafted up top for a reason. Their natural gifts will shove them back on track soon enough.
In short: this group represents a constellation of the NHL's future (and present) stars.
---
DEFENSIVE PAIRINGS:
Dion Phaneuf (9) - Shea Weber (49)
Brent Burns (20) - Brent Seabrook (14)
Braydon Coburn (8) - Ryan Suter (7)
---
Book it: the top three defensemen of this group will annually contend for the Norris Trophy once Nicklas Lidstrom finally grows bored of casually dominating the entire league. Phaneuf's already been a finalist, and has garnered plenty of hype for his spine-adjusting hits and crackling slapshot. Oh yes, and his girlfriend.
Then you've got the NHL's leading blueline scorer in Weber, who is fast becoming a beast of a player for the Predators. Already, he's getting some Norris love for his work this season. Next comes Brent Burns, and it's almost getting redundant, but like Phaneuf and Weber he does everything well. He's big, powerful, fast, and wires it from the point. Plus, our patron blogger Mirtle has been trumpeting his abilities for over a year now.
Not to be outdone, Seabrook and Suter are silky smooth with the puck, and Braydon Coburn will be a ghost that haunts Don Waddell and the Atlanta organization forever... especially when he's shutting down the Thrashers' top line in Philips Arena twice a year for the next decade.
Together, these six players represent the new breed of NHL defenseman. Not just hulking golems that lean on forwards and hack at skill guys, but dexterous players who can impact the play at both ends of the ice.
---
GOALIES:
Marc-Andre Fleury (1)
Jaroslav Halak (271)
---
At opposite ends of the draft, the Penguins and Canadiens each picked up a starting-caliber netminder. Fleury, who nearly got Blackburn-ed when Pittsburgh brass rushed him into the NHL at 18, has since helped lead his team to the Stanley Cup Final. His annual injuries are becoming a concern, but it's impossible to discount his athleticism and growing swagger.
Halak's an interesting case: a supremely talented youngster eternally buried behind an even younger, even more talented goaltender. We won't know his full mettle until he escapes the blinding glare of Jesus Price's halo, but for now it's safe to say that he's got a full-time future in the NHL.
So... have alternate roster suggestions? Want to further bask in the brilliance of this draft class? Want me to shut up already? That's what the comments section is for, people.
This item was created by a member of this blog's community and is not necessarily endorsed by From The Rink.
9 recs |
10 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Nice Post
Nice work, the depth in the 2003 draft is truly staggering. In an attempt to avoid studying for an exam I have to write in 3 and a half hours, I put together a 2003 Second Team (mainly because I was amazed that Vancouver’s Ryan Kesler couldn’t be considered one of the 12 best forwards to come out of a draft).
David Backes—Patrick O’Sullivan—Andrei Kostitsyn
Dustin Byfuglien—Ryan Kesler—Lee Stempniak
Loui Eriksson—Joe Pavelski—Steve Bernier
Nigel Dawes—Maxim Lapierre—Daniel Carcillo
A pretty damn good lineup considering the star-studded top 12 Zarley already claimed. Backes, Pavelski and Kostitsyn have all proven to be scorers at the NHL level. Byfuglien, Eriksson, Lapierre and Stempniak are poised to have big seasons this year. Kesler is (in my opinion) one of the premier checking centres in the league. And O’Sullivan is loaded with potential. Oilers fans can feel free to substitute Zach Stortini for Daniel Carcillo in the obligatory “enforcer” role.
Ryan Parent—Tobias Enstrom
Mark Stuart—Matt Carle
Alexandre Picard—Shane O’Brien
Gets pretty weak beyond the top pairing. Enstrom and Carle have both struggled at times this season, but have the tools to be top pairing defencemen. Parent is currently injured, but has looked like a very solid player in his time with the Flyers. O’Brien and Stuart are servicable, and Picard is there on potential alone.
Jimmy Howard
Brian Elliot
So it falls apart a little bit here. Jimmy Howard has looked good in limited NHL action (a .915 save percentage in 8 games) but it’s worrying that he wasn’t able to crack the roster when Hasek retired. He plays a bit of an unorthadox style so that might contribute to his difficulties in making the leap to the NHL (although if Tim Thomas is teaching us anything, it’s that style doesn’t matter if you keep the puck out of the net). Brian Elliot is currently in Binghamton, but he looks like Ottawa’s goaltender of the future.
Beyond Marc-Andre Fleury, 2003 was a weak draft for goaltenders, but otherwise an exceptional year for top quality players.
by MattChesser on Dec 5, 2008 5:04 AM CST reply actions 6 recs
Some great depth here
Nice post and reply: I think Matt’s second team really shows how deep this draft was. Any draft where Kesler, Kostitsyn, Enstrom and Carle can’t even make the first squad is pretty amazing in my books. Kesler might bump one of those first-team guys if he keeps playing well.
Queen's Journal Sports Editor.
Personal sports blog at www.sportingmadness.blogspot.com.
Contributing writer at Out of Left Field: www.neatesager.blogspot.com.
by Andrew Bucholtz on Dec 7, 2008 2:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd
That’s a great post and a really good reply.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Dec 5, 2008 9:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ditto
International competitions have their next crop of stars from this bunch.
by David Danforth on Dec 5, 2008 10:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Phaneuf’s already been a finalist, and has garnered plenty of hype for his spine-adjusting hits and crackling slapshot . Oh yes, and his girlfriend.
Unfortunately no one notices that he is pedestrian defensively, has the Fulton Reed shot (hard, but likely to completely miss) and is a turnover machine. He also gets caught out of position trying to live up to his own hype of being a big hitter. Oh and even NHL players have voted him one of the 3 most overrated players in the league…
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Dec 5, 2008 10:23 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
Didn’t mean to sound too critical, this was a fantastic post. I just can’t stand the constant media slobbering over a greatly overrated player, so i feel the need to bring this up every time someone talks about how good he is.
Despite this he will still garner Norris votes since most of the people who vote for it don’t actually watch western conference games, and Phaneuf is perfect for the 5 second clip era. That being said anyone who votes for Phaneuf over Weber this season should have their vote taken away.
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Dec 5, 2008 10:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Betcha can't guess...
…without looking it up, who the only player in the first round of that draft never to play a single NHL game is.
If you said “Huge Specimen” Jessiman, then you are a fellow Ranger fan, and you have my condolences. Unreal that, with all the talent available, the Rangers completely whiffed.
Jessiman wasn’t even the best player on his team at Dartmouth, as that honor went to Stempniak. Don’t know if the Rangers were going for size, or based their pick on the fact that he grew up a Ranger fan or something similarly asinine like that, but they completely blew it in the deepest draft in recent memory.
by self loather on Dec 5, 2008 11:34 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
If I Recall Correctly
Even from the 2003 Draft Guide from the Hockey News – who was really on-point with how deep the draft would be then – Jessiman was listed as a big project who would go to school for four years and all that. Every time you read the word “project” you don’t know if you’re going to get a guy like Blake Wheeler or Mike Rupp or a non-NHLer.
Maybe Jessiman will be a late bloomer in Milwaukee. But, yeah, the Rangers blew that one. So did the Islanders selecting Robert Nilsson at 15th. I think he’s turning out to be a decent player – for Edmonton. That they selected him over Zach Parise who even had the Islander connection and fit a need at forward is still amazing. Steve Bernier at 16 wasn’t a great pick by San Jose either.
by John Fischer on Dec 6, 2008 9:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So did the Islanders selecting Robert Nilsson at 15th. I think he’s turning out to be a decent player – for Edmonton. That they selected him over Zach Parise who even had the Islander connection and fit a need at forward is still amazing.
Yes, it was fishy then and only gets more amazing over time. [Sigh.]
Lighthouse Hockey: a New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
by Dominik on Dec 7, 2008 5:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
@MattChesser: I’m delighted to see that this post inspired both academic procrastination (which I minored in at the university) and even more thorough hockey nerddom. Well-done. You’re right: the other hallmark of this draft is the variety of complimentary players it produced.
You’ve got Kesler (my last cut), who is going to become the John Madden of Vancouver, some super second-liners in O’Sullivan and Kostitsyn, the hitting machine David Backes, and so on and so forth. This class is young enough that the future is still being written for a bunch of its members (especially on D and in goal), so we’ll have to see where everyone stands in another five years.
@Jibblescribbits: You broke my heart, man! I kid, though. Phaneuf is a very interesting case study for me. For years, people have lamented the fact that poor ol’ Jarome Iginla is buried up in Calgary, out of the media spotlight.
But then Phaneuf comes in, and like you said, becomes an instant press darling. I think that’s because he entered the league so fully formed. As a 20-year-old defenseman, he wasn’t one of those timid young blueliners who play it safe during their rookie year. Kid went all out, and deservingly got plenty of attention and kudos.
That initial love affair has helped to cover up his deficiencies, which have become more exposed during his subsequent years in the league. Notice that I referred to the “hype” around him in my little blurb. In terms of pure physical gifts and range, he’s clearly at the top of this class with Weber and Burns. That’s what people love about him. The rest, I argue, will come… so long as he doesn’t get caught up in his own press clippings.
Dude is still 23 years old, just five months older than me. Like everyone else from his class, he hasn’t even approached his prime years yet… which makes this group all the more scary.
@self loather: Indeed, Jessiman will go down as THE bust of this draft, barring some sort of miraculous turnaround in Nashville. From first-rounder to traded for futures? Ouch.
The New York Rangers seriously have to start questioning their draft strategies. Unfortunately, they’ve become the victims of two first rounders who had their careers tragically cut short (Cherepanov, obviously, and Dan Blackburn, who is referenced in my article above). But beyond that, their first round history is pretty rancid, with the exception of Marc Staal. You’d have to go back to 1991 (Alexei Kovalev) for a first round Rangers pick who really became an NHL star.
"Sweet Zarley Zalapski, Batman!"
by ZarleyZalapski on Dec 5, 2008 12:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 

















