Komisarek on giving up his '8'
No one looked happier to be spending an hour and a half of face time with the media this afternoon than Mike Komisarek.
I was late getting in, but the Eastern Conference all-stars were slated to have their meet and greets from 2:30 to 4:00, and few were left sitting at their booths by about 3:45. Komisarek, however, had a small scrum – and a big grin on his face – and one of the main questions on everyone's mind was the conversation that took place when the league asked that he not wear No. 8.
You see, normal all-star protocol (it exists, apparently) dictates than the more veteran player gets to keep his number for the game. Komisarek has 325 NHL games to his name, just a few more than Ovechkin's 291.
Ovechkin, however, wanted the number (or the league wanted to sell jerseys to that effect), Komisarek didn't give a hoot, and, well, the Habs defenceman says he will wear No. 44.
He shrugged.
"Eighty-eight, I thought, eh, Eric Lindros, power forward."
A reporter joked he could have instead worn 87, an obvious reference to the fact Crosby won't be using it.
"I'm not here to step on anyone's toes, let's put it that way!" Komisarek said, laughing. "I'm just happy to be here enjoying the whole weekend."
"You know what, I didn't think twice about [giving up the number]."
This is really a once-in-a-career type event for Komisarek, who's really blossomed the past few seasons as a defensive defender but who would never have had a chance to skate as an all-star if not for fan voting. He's no Rory Fitzpatrick, but he's also a bit of an everyman and "lucky" to be there in a similar fashion.
He knows it.
0 recs |
8 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Interesting. He’s “really blossomed the past few seasons as a defensive defender” yet he doesn’t appear on your Rod Langway list, nor is he even mentioned as an honourable mention (despite having played the required 30 games).
Methinks Komisarek is this season’s contender for the Trevor Linden award, which is given out annually to the NHL player who gets significantly better than deserved media coverage because he plays nice with the media.
by cferneyh on Jan 23, 2009 4:42 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
He’s not that far off the list this year and has been on it in the past. He’s a solid defensive defenceman, nothing more.
by James Mirtle on Jan 23, 2009 4:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
unless you're TSN
and that “solid defensive defenceman” is listed as one half of the top D pairing for the all-time Canadiens team.
by smyttysmullet on Jan 23, 2009 4:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Who, Komisarek? Or Doug Harvey?
One, I would buy. The other…eh, not so much.
by Doogie2K on Jan 23, 2009 10:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Classy.
Soak it up, Mike. Congrats on being there.
The Litter Box: Your SBNation Florida Panthers Blogging Colossus
by Whale4ever on Jan 23, 2009 8:03 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
During a stretch where the University of Michigan consistently had unappealing teams (a stretch the lasted from the graduation of The Class in 1997 to the Porter/Kolarik team last year), Mike Komisarek was one of the few players I genuinely liked.* I know he’s not really an All-Star, but I’m really glad that he’s there.
*The other two names that spring to mind are Josh Blackburn and Jed Ortmeyer.
by J. Michael Neal on Jan 23, 2009 9:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Why not both?
Is there any good reason against letting Ovechkin and Komisarek both wear #8? After all, this is a meaningless game where official stats are not kept.
This, to me, would have been the best decision.
by Phoff on Jan 24, 2009 11:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Because it would play merry hell with the NHL’s computerized scoring system. Same reason players were forbidden from wearing 0 or 00 after 1999. (Martin Biron was pissed at that.)
by Doogie2K on Jan 24, 2009 11:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















