More on bigger NHL players
by James Mirtle on Oct 21, 2009 8:24 PM CDT
13 comments
With full credit to ESPN for the data, here's a look at how NHL players' heights (in inches) and weights (in pounds) have increased over time, sorted by position:
You can see the levelling off of forwards and the decrease in size for defencemen postlockout (think Mike Green), as well as the continuing trend toward taller and taller netminders (think Ben Bishop). It's going to be interesting if things continue on this path, as goalies could soon be the tallest — yet still the lightest — players in the game.
0 recs |
13 comments
| Add comment
|
Email
Print
Comments
Context?
How does this compare to the population at large?
"Without good hard work, it is impossible to reach the pinnacle of success." - Anatoli Tarasov
by PRC on Oct 21, 2009 8:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
On the other thread, someone mentioned the average American male has gone from 5-foot-8 and 165 pounds in the 1960s to an inch taller and significantly heavier now. I haven’t looked the figures up, though.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Oct 21, 2009 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Besides Darren Pang...
what caused the drop in goalie size during the 80s? Does it have anything to do with the higher scoring during that time period?
by Hansmoleman on Oct 21, 2009 8:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Mike Vernon
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
by Doogie2K on Oct 21, 2009 11:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
35-40 had a real drop in weight too. Weird…
by Mrs @ MHH on Oct 22, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Tiny Thompson had people thinking you needed someone small and mobile for a while.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
by Doogie2K on Oct 22, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Purely speculation
but people didn’t have a lot of money, and food was harder to come by. I’d guess NHL players, like everyone else, were eating a lot less.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 22, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably not
since it’s only really goaltenders,
With as few goaltenders as there were then it’s probably purely a normal statistical glitch.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 22, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes. For one thing, there are no error bars on these points, and without a baseline (ie: how the general population’s height and weight have changed) it doesn’t really mean anything.
In fact, even with those additional pieces of information, this study still doesn’t mean anything. Professional athletes have grown over the years as general lifestyle, sports medicine, training and the size of the talent pool have all improved? No kidding.
by Fultron on Oct 22, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, it tells you how large players have been in these competitions over time. The are larger masses at play, etc., and we’ve quantified just how much larger they are.
People are trying to read into this too much.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Oct 22, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Que?
What are those numbers on the vertical axis of the height chart?
by garth the hoser on Oct 21, 2009 9:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Inches. 72 inches = 6 feet tall.
And now at Beyond the Boxscore and Project Prospect!
by Mike Rogers on Oct 21, 2009 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Join the community and dive in!
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
