How the top teams spend their cap space
This is something I was working on before vacation, a mini-study of how five of the NHL's best teams are allocating their cap space this year. The five I went with are all right up against the cap, and all experienced a ton of success last year: The Sharks, Red Wings, Bruins, Capitals and Penguins.
Part of the reason I wanted to do this was, in looking at how GM Doug Wilson had revamped San Jose's roster by cutting depth and adding a top end stud in Dany Heatley, it was really clear how top heavy he had elected to go. And that's becoming the norm under the cap these days:
In dealing with a 22-man roster, the top 11 players take home 82 per cent of these teams' salary dollars, with the bottom 11 players (the last seven forwards, three defencemen and the backup goaltender) making the remaining 18 per cent.
In other words, these teams' top 11 players average about $4.2-million apiece, whereas the players on the low end, filling out checking lines and minor roles, make an average of about $930,000.
Here are a few more breakdowns of these top five teams:
| Avg | % | Avg % | |
| Forwards | $33,220,239 | 58.5% | 4.5% |
| Defencemen | $18,386,166 | 32.4% | 4.6% |
| Goaltenders | $4,901,000 | 8.6% | 4.3% |
| Buyouts | $515,000 | 0.9% | |
| Avg | % | Avg % | |
| Starting 6 | $33,249,434 | 58.5% | 9.8% |
| Top F line | $18,380,268 | 32.4% | 10.8% |
| Top six F | $26,402,768 | 46.5% | 7.7% |
| Top D pair | $10,610,833 | 18.7% | 9.3% |
| Top four D | $15,692,500 | 27.6% | 6.9% |
| Starting G | $4,258,333 | 7.5% | 7.5% |
| Bottom 11 | $10,153,804 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Some of the noteworthy numbers there? These teams spend nearly one-third of their total salary on their top forward line, with another 19 per cent on their top two defenders. Add in the No. 1 goalie and you have what I'm calling the "Starting 6," a group that takes home nearly 60 per cent of these five teams' payroll.
The top six players on the NHL's top five teams average more than $5.5-million each, which leaves only $23.5-million for the other 14 to 17 players on the roster (depending on the number of healthy scratches involved).
I haven't crunched all the numbers on how this has evolved over time since last season, but I'd be willing to wager that those low end numbers have continued to fall as the "Starting 6" and top 11 players pull in more and more of the pie. Cap or no cap, the skilled players are getting their contracts; it's everyone else who's fighting for what's left.
And that's probably the way it should be.
1 recs |
7 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Top-heavy is probably the correct strategy if you are trying to buy wins as efficiently as possible, as outlined by Tyler’s article here: http://www.mc79hockey.com/?p=3194
by R O on Oct 8, 2009 11:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought you said top teams
Those teams are a combined 6-6-1
/enjoying it while I can
The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 8, 2009 11:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Top four teams in last year’s standings and the Stanley Cup winner… felt pretty safe when I did this two weeks ago.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Oct 8, 2009 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Would be interesting to see how this compares to the pre-capped NHL
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else
by Fauxrumors on Oct 8, 2009 12:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice post, I just compared the numbers to our team spending way below the cap and the difference is as expected: we spend a little less on top 6 but everything else is about the same.
by ThrashersRecaps on Oct 8, 2009 12:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I do think this suggests that parrity (or unexpected falling offs) are here to stay. 2 injuries to a teams top 6 moves them from elite to crap. Many of these teams also have excellent bargains from their bottom 11. In following Ottawa, we obviously lost some top end players to the cap, but equally as troubling was the extra money that went to formally bargain basement bottom end guys like Kelly and Fisher and Vermette etc.
by Waterloo Sens Fan on Oct 8, 2009 12:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
was the extra money that went to formally bargain basement bottom end guys like Kelly and Fisher and Vermette etc.
Yup, and that money took a lot of the hunger away from those guys especially Kelly, Fisher, and Neil.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Oct 9, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















