GMs change tune on head shots
"The hitting in the game is great, but every once in a while you have to sit back and say, ‘That hit may be legal, but is there something wrong with it?' The only issue I have is when the player is vulnerable, there is a blindside hit and the only contact is made to the player’s head.
"If there are three or four of those a year, maybe we can attack and eliminate a lot of them."
If we're looking at a rule change that's only going to come into play three or four times a year, it's obviously not going to be all that radical, but this is at least a tiptoe in the right direction for the NHL. It shows that GMs are taking the concussion issue more seriously and that they're listening to what a large majority of their fans – and players – are calling for.
This, combined with improvements in equipment like the new helmet Mark Messier is advocating for and less rigid shoulder pads, will hopefully help reduce numbers like these.
Speaking of the the new bucket, the GMs heard the spiel from Messier and company today as part of their meetings in Toronto and came away pretty impressed. Brian Burke said he's going to outfit the team's AHL club with the helmets as a trial run, which leads me to believe we could be seeing NHL clubs in them as soon as next season.
I had a chance to talk to one of the few players wearing one this season earlier today in the Leafs' Garnet Exelby, and he gave it a glowing review (story should be at globesports.com later tonight). Exelby's already had three concussions in his career and for obvious reasons sought out the helmet this summer when he heard about it.
I'm sure other players will do the same once word gets around.
0 recs |
13 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Let's hope there's progress.
Cynic that I am, I would have thought that the GMs’ solution to headshots would be to call a double-minor on the victim for not having 360-degree peripheral vision and a 10-minute misconduct for intent to be injured.
I’m sure that whatever they come up with will be an improvement over that. How big of an improvement is the question.
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
by zyllyx on Nov 11, 2009 8:40 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Chris Phillips and Jesse Winchester wear the helmet too.
Also, there are some teams looking at a concussion preventing mouthguard (for hits to the jaw), and it’s now covered by the League’s insurance for players with concussion history.
I did a piece on it here – http://www.silversevensens.com/2009/11/9/1115706/another-concussion-reducing
Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.
by DarrenM on Nov 11, 2009 10:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Actually, Exelby said he thinks more concussions are caused by hits to the jaw than to the head. Didn’t manage to fit that in there, but I know there’s a lot more talk about mouth guards than in the past.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 11, 2009 10:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hasnt he been involved in giving a few of those concussions out?
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Nov 12, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Helmet safety is so important in this. I still can’t believe how easily Fanelli’s helmet came off in that devastating hit. It was obviously not on properly to fly off like that.
A better helmet, and enforcement of actually wearing the helmet properly would do a lot.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Nov 11, 2009 10:13 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
The enforcement of wearing the helmet properly is going to be tough – some of these guys have the strap on purely for decoration, and they’re still keeping the visor optional at this point. The pace of change in the NHL is glacial, unfortunately.
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
by zyllyx on Nov 11, 2009 10:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s fine for the NHL… they are adults after all. You can have seatbelt laws but that doesn’t mean people will obey them. But a 16 year old kid shouldn’t be allowed on the ice with a helmet that isn’t fitted or strapped on properly.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Nov 12, 2009 12:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I read that his helmet flew off because the impact of the hit broke the helmet.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 12, 2009 8:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I call BS. Bergeron’s helmet didn’t come off and that Jones hit from behind had just as much impact on it. It’s no secret that plenty of players wear their helmets loosely.
And if his helmet did break, he should file a lawsuit against the manufacturer.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Nov 12, 2009 8:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Head v Jaw
Your statement from exelby on this point has me confused. First off, do players not consider a hit to the jaw a hit to the head? Secondly, in any hit where the concussion appears to have been caused by the initial player on player contact, (as opposed to secondary conduct of the receiving players head with the boards or ice) the contact is almost always between the checker’s shoulder/elbow/forearm/hands and the puck carriers jaw or cheek region. If these are not going to be eliminated or curtailed by hit to the head rule changes than what the hell is the point?
by CalTach on Nov 12, 2009 8:38 AM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
His point was that the helmet can only do so much given it doesn’t protect the jaw area.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 12, 2009 10:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When Burke makes a comment like this…
If you’re a hitter and a player is vulnerable, you have to let up or hit somewhere else, not the head."
…it actually gives me some hope that meaningful change will come sooner rather than later. That is exactly the type of change in attitude that the players need to adopt.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Nov 12, 2009 11:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Corrective mouth guards
Hershey Bear players wear a retainer like mouth guad that covers only the back teeth. They done care about protecting their teeth. Speech and drink is more imporant to them. CHUBBS an NHL workers comp provider see’s the benefit in fitting these players in order to keep them off their payroll. Because of the CBA, other providers must offer this same benefit. www.mahercor.com
by steve777 on Nov 12, 2009 10:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















