Q: Back, briefly to Balsillie: given all the water that's under the bridge, is there any chance he could become an NHL owner?
A: There's a lot of water under that bridge. There's so much water some could argue the bridge washed out. I'm a believer that it's a long life and I would never say never. But let's not get hysterical with the headline. It's not something that I foresee any time soon.
— Gary Bettman comments on all things Coyotes an interview with Macleans magazine this week
2 months ago
James Mirtle
16 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Samueli didn’t try to do an end-around of the NHL’s rules for approving owners when he bought the Ducks.
by Nael M. on Nov 13, 2009 11:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Naw...
… he just lied to federal regulators and had to pay over 12 mil in fines. Totally different situation.
But Samueli is the kind of guy the NHL thinks should be owning a team. Uh, yeah.
by HockeyinHD on Nov 13, 2009 7:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The 12 mil was part of the plea bargain which the judge in the case rejected. No new sentence has been imposed so its more accurate to say that “Samueli tried to pay 12 mil” since he appealed to have the plea bargain reinstated. That appeal was rejected in Sept. because no actual sentence has been imposed, among other reasons . Samueli can file an appeal (per the Appeals Court) when sentencing has actually taken place. That sentencing is not expected until after Henry Nicholas’ trial which is supposed to begin in April 2010.
The NHL may face these issues again when Samueli is actually sentenced by the judge or his likely appeal is decided. But what’s far, far more disturbing in this case than what Bettmann does is the way the judge is making a mockery of the 6th Amendment right to a “speedy trial” (which has always been interpreted to include “speedy” sentencing"). Despite his bluster about “justice not being for sale” the judge’s motivation is clearly to force Samueli to give evidence against Nicholas and others in the Broadcom case, something the prosecution did not request in its plea bargain. At least two years,possibly three or more will have passed from Samueli’s guilty plea until his sentencing is complete which is not the way the US Constitution is supposed to work.
by Big Picture Guy on Nov 13, 2009 7:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But Samueli is the kind of guy the NHL thinks should be owning a team. Uh, yeah.
And that’s the preogative of the league and Board of Governors. If they want continue to allow a guy who commited crimes (see also: Harold Ballard) membership into their club as long as he played by their rules to get in there in the first place, more power to them.
Balsillie should not be given an NHL franchise just because he happens to have a cleaner character than the existing owners. If he wants one, he needs to get approval from the other owners like everybody else. Yes, character does play a role in getting approved, but so does a willingness to follow the league constitution and to play nice with the other owners, and Balsillie displayed none of the latter two properties in his dealings with Phoenix (and arguably Nashville and Pittsburgh).
by Nael M. on Nov 14, 2009 12:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The point, alas, has been missed.
The NHL rejects Balsillie, not because he was a bad guy but because he wanted to move a team against the wishes of the Comissioner’s office.
The NHL accepts outright criminals, as long as they don’t want to do anything with their NHL franchise that may go against Bettman’s ‘master plan’.
This is why the NHL is run badly. They have people tremendously lacking in character and class making the decisions.
Until that changes, the league will continue to make stupid decisions and look bad doing so.
by HockeyinHD on Nov 14, 2009 5:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Your post is wrong on so many levels it is questionable whether there is a point in trying to educate you. Your previous posts have shown a stubborn resistance to actual information.
by Gerald on Nov 14, 2009 10:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And if you dropped the condescension that most of your posts drip with, Gerald, you might get a little further in your attempts to “educate”.
by dzuunmod on Nov 14, 2009 6:59 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
Rec’d for echoing my sentiments exactly.
by Vent on Nov 14, 2009 7:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Really? You think so? I doubt it. I really do. There is an endless stream of this stuff on the web, driven by nothing more than the "well, everybody knows … " kind of groupthink. I am all out of sympathy.
Thanks for the advice, though.
by Gerald on Nov 14, 2009 11:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, you wanna whistle in the wind, I guess it’s no business of mine.
by dzuunmod on Nov 15, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I really think so.
Try this:
Stop making any comments on any website for 2 weeks. There probably won’t be that many posts about Jim anyway. Check each website where you normally make comments daily to see if any other poster notices that you have stopped posting. Maybe also reflect on the adage about what remains when you remove your hand from a pool of water.
by BJLB on Nov 17, 2009 4:33 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Samueli
Only broke the law, the lesser of the two evils:)
Leafs selling hope to the hopeless since 1967
by Toe Blake Hockey on Nov 13, 2009 3:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The full interview?
Is the full interview online at their website? Tried to find the full interview, but had no luck…
by gjhead on Nov 14, 2009 11:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I couldn’t find it either. It’s actually not that ground breaking.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 14, 2009 1:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

















