Looking at what ails the Leafs
I had the chance to take in the Leafs-Flames game here in Toronto, a contest that was essentially over 10 minutes in after a couple iffy goals. Jonas Gustavsson had his first really tough night in the crease, allowing three goals on five shots before he was chased from the crease.
More on that here, for those that are interested in a two-day old game story.
The only positive on the Leafs side of things, at least according to Ron Wilson, was the play of newcomer Carl Gunnarsson — an apparently late-blooming seventh rounder who made his NHL debut. I didn't know anything about the kid, but he did play for Sweden at the worlds back in the spring and reportedly was very strong in training camp.
I don't think many seventh rounders get 21 minutes ice time in their first game, but so it was on Saturday. Given his stats over in Sweden, I can't fathom why he was on the power play for four-plus minutes, but Wilson's got something in mind with him I guess.
As for what's wrong with the rest of the team, well... a lot of things. Dave Shoalts outlines what's going on up front, where things haven't been pretty (aside from Phil Kessel):
Forget any theory that if the Leafs, who have been out scored 23-9 in the first period this season, could learn to start games better their problems would be over. The evidence is clear the forwards are just not good enough. ...
When Burke and Wilson started that playoff talk, part of their reasoning was that their key forwards would improve their modest numbers from last season. There was an argument that since the Leafs were 10th last season in the NHL in goals for that they would be better this season with a rebuilt defence.
All that has resulted so far is a strong argument the forwards were overachievers last season.
Pretty tough to argue with that, at least in the early going. And the problem is that the hole's just getting too deep for Toronto.
The blueline hasn't exactly been great, either, although Tomas Kaberle's impressed me (especially on the power play). If they move him closer to the deadline, a contending team would do well to add his puck-moving skills on the back end.
As a No. 1 defenceman, he's adequate, but if you drop him to second or third on the depth chart on a really good team, he could shine.
At the beginning of the year, I wasn't expecting great things out of this team — mostly just more of the same, a 10th to 12th place finish in a conference with a lot of poor teams and a seventh or eighth overall pick for the Bruins.
Now? Could be a lot uglier than that.
As someone now getting out to see this team up close, in practice, etc., a couple days a week, I'm really not all that concerned about how it shakes out. If anything, Wilson's been easier to deal with as the team has struggled. What's clear, however, is just how hard it is on the players in a media bubble like this, where they're asked each and every day to chronicle the hows and whys of how poorly they're playing. A young guy like Luke Schenn, for instance, is just frustrated beyond all belief (as seen in Chicago on Friday when he threw that mini-tantrum on the bench after he was the goat on the first goal).
We've seen a lot of teams over the years have brutal starts like this and slowly climb out of it, but given how the past four years have gone in Toronto, there's not a lot of optimism here. It seems all but certain now this team will miss the playoffs again, keeping their last postseason date way back in May of 2004, and the natives will get restless.
The building's still full every night, but there's seems to be less and less cheer as we go.
Unless you count all those Calgary fans at the ACC on Saturday...
0 recs |
66 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Hmmn. Sounds like a team that’s 11-8-0 would have a chance to make some fans in Southern Ontario.
by J. Michael Neal on Nov 16, 2009 8:08 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
“Fans”?
That term would very loosely apply to anyone that jumped ship when a team does poorly. Sounds more like a bandwagoner to me.
Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...
by JohnnyG on Nov 16, 2009 8:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oops hit post too soon,
Meant to add another note in regards to the 10th in scoring comment from Shoalts, it wasn’t just last years offense that gave people the impression they were better then this. The Leafs have been a top scoring team since the lockout, but have really struggled in net and on defense.
I don’t think anyone would have predicted this big of a drop off, Most predictions had the Leafs Pegged to finished 9th to 12th losing out to the rest of the bubble teams. Unfortunately that is seeming like a more difficult task then first thought.
Life as a Toronto Sports Fan?... *sigh*... It is what it is...
by JohnnyG on Nov 16, 2009 8:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Aw man, I really thought we were going to get the first article in history to discuss a struggling Leafs squad without throwing in a meaningless reference to the building being full.
This was like losing a no-hitter in the ninth inning. Positively Stieb-ish.
Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.
by Down Goes Brown on Nov 16, 2009 9:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think it’s meaningless to those outside Toronto. The atmosphere in the building is what I’m referring to… it’s getting slightly more hostile with each year of losing, IMO.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 11:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The city's getting hostile
The Raptors, Jays, and I presume Argonauts are all booed pretty quickly these days by the home fans.
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Nov 16, 2009 1:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly… not a lot of fun for Toronto sports fans.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 2:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The city getting increasingly hostile is a valid point. Even TFC’s love affair is basically over and next year could get very ugly if the team misses the playoffs.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 16, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hearing that the ACC has atmosphere is news to me.
by Resolute on Nov 16, 2009 6:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It varies. The Saturday games are much better than the weekday ones.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 6:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It varies. The Saturday games are much better than the weekday ones.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 6:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting piece
It’s a notion that I’ve been wrestling with – that despite receiving sub .900 goaltending, the Leafs managed to significantly overachieve to finish 7th-last last year.
James, I wonder what you think of your colleague Jeff Blair’s recent assertion that, wherever the picks are, the Leafs had to add a top-end forward, and they’ve done that with Kessel. Agree or disagree?
by Godd Till on Nov 16, 2009 9:31 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree to an extent, and I did when they got Kessel. But if that ends up being the first overall pick, the optics are terrible.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 11:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Imagine if it’s another lotto pick in 2011 as well.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Nov 16, 2009 11:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t imagine Burke sits with this roster for long. He’ll dramatically overhaul things if they’re that bad in Year 1.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have to think that he tries to recoup some picks at the deadline, moves out some guys, (although only Kaberle would fetch a 1st and be available), and then tries to add a couple top-6 forwards in free agency this summer.
by Godd Till on Nov 16, 2009 12:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That wouldn’t guarantee success in Year 2, though. And the free agent class this year thins out once Savard re-ups with Boston. Kovalchuk is there, but then it’s your Jokinens, Frolovs, Plekanecs and Kariyas, unless Burke thinks Marleau wants to be reunited with Wilson.
Unless you also forsee a coaching change being an option Burke will explore.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Nov 16, 2009 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Even a Frolov or Jokinen is a big upgrade on a Stajan or Blake, though I take yr point. Fletch was certainly right last year when he said Antro was the only top-6 forward; I can’t believe how much he is missed.
I wouldn’t expect a coaching change to be considered until season’s end, at earliest, but I wouldn’t rule that out.
by Godd Till on Nov 16, 2009 1:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the good thing about there only being second tier talent is that there’s always Kessel in the first tier, so at least we’re not completely deficient there. Though I am very worried about teams being able to shut him down due to no other legitimate threats, we’ll see how well the rest of the season goes for him.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
by Karina on Nov 16, 2009 2:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why the Leafs struggle...
To me, the Leafs struggle because they are populated with average hockey players. In a league full of stars, each team needs elite talent to rise above the rest of the teams. Even mediocre teams have one or two elite players. As for the Leafs, Kessel and Kaberle are the closest they have to that. I agree with James that Kaberle is more of a 2 or 3. And Kessel is very good but, he isn’t elite. There are other players who are good like Beauchemin, Toskala is not bad, he is simply average. There are many other players on the roster who are not bad but, simply average. Media and fans always seem to blame goaltending when a team fails. In reality, Toskala is no less average than the majority of his teammates. Gustavsson will be good and I am surprised he’s done so well behind this team. Remember, he’s never played NHL hockey before this season and he has given his team a chance to win on most nights. I do think the Kessel trade was ill advised because looking at this team one would have had to imagine they would not compete for a deep playoff run. Some people say the draft class is nothing special next year. But, would you ever turn down having a number 1 pick? You could always trade the pick for players closer to the draft if you indeed don’t like the crop of players.
"I'm gonna hire you as my latex salesman? I don't think so. Why would I do that?"
"Vandelay! Say Vandelay Industries!"
"And you wanna be my latex salesman?"
by Urban Sombrero on Nov 16, 2009 2:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
So, the Leafs aren’t winning cause they don’t have enough good players? That’s crazy talk.
by Godd Till on Nov 16, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
what’s crazy is calling Toskala average.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
by Karina on Nov 16, 2009 4:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 6:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He was far from average Friday I’ll tell you that as he nearly stole that game for the Leafs. Simply put he was sensational.
It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!
by hawks61 on Nov 16, 2009 6:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, and if he can do that consistently, I’m sure a lot of people around here will be eating crow. But he’s been bad pretty much for the last 13 months when healthy.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 6:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Leafs future
Totally disagree with you on Kessel not being elite, did you watch the game against Chicago? Or any other game since being a member with the Leafs? With a little more emphasis on defensive play this kid will become an all-around star that already reminds me a lot of Mike Modano- high flying speed with an wicked wrister that he disguises well.
The future is bright in Toronto with kids like Kessel and Kadri in the fold (don’t forget next season he’ll be a Leaf), not to mention with Gustavsson in goal and Schenn on the blueline (he’s struggling just like Seabrook did in his 2nd year).
Like most franchises it’s going to take time but if the Leafs stay patient they’ll back to the contender they were in the early 2000’s.
It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!
by hawks61 on Nov 16, 2009 6:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The future is bright in Toronto with kids like Kessel and Kadri in the fold (don’t forget next season he’ll be a Leaf)
It’s the only thing keeping me going from day to day.
by Vent on Nov 16, 2009 6:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s what puzzles me about who the Leafs should get in the off-season as centre who can get Kessel the puck. They already have that guy in Khadri as everyone will see once the World Juniors arrive when he dominates that tournament.
It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!
by hawks61 on Nov 16, 2009 6:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, this sounds stupid but it’s right on the money. The problem is the Toronto mindset. You’re analysing this team as though it was expected to do anything better than finish in the basement of the league.
Half the problem is that the players suck; the other half is the gravitational pull at the Centre of the Universe. The Leafs, with their fanbase and media coverage, are made out to be something way way beyond what they are. Guys like “XLB” and “The Monster” are apperently all-stars. Kessel is hailed as an amazing superstar to lead this team to the next generation, but he was only the third-best player on Boston where he was helped by dynamite linemates on a league-leading team. Seriously, where else, aside from maybe someplace in the former Czechoslovakia, would Tomas Kaberle be a household name? Look at the predictions at the start of this season: the coach and GM were talking about a playoff run. They traded away two top draft picks, like it was even remotely possible. And the fans lapped it up.
Really, it’s hard to appreciate unless you get away from GTA and look from the outside in.
by Fultron on Nov 16, 2009 6:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And that was supposed to be a reply to Urban Sombrero, sorry.
by Fultron on Nov 16, 2009 6:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm away from the GTA
And looking in.
It still seems silly.
And it isn’t that it’s COMPLETELY the wrong assessment – it’s not – it’s just overblown like everything else is when pointed at Toronto.
The team is overpopulated with third and fourth-line forwards – this is true, and you won’t get any argument from any reasonable Leaf fan over this. Contrary to your opinion, XLB is nearly universally despised in the Barilkosphere, so don’t get that idea into your head (though I will agree that Gustavsson has been, to say the least, hyped).
Kessel IS a superstar, and you’d be mistaken to believe he was third-best on Boston who was “helped” by dynamite linemates. He is awesome, and only 21.
Kaberle… well, if you don’t think he’s a good defenseman, you’re just not watching Leaf games (which may or may not be the case, I dunno). The guy is a first-line D-man on 26 of the 30 teams in the NHL.
by Vent on Nov 16, 2009 6:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Like I said, I think most reasonable fans thought they’d be about 10th in the East this year with the additions. But, as Shoalts wrote, a lot of the players are having a hard time duplicating what they did last season, and it’s killing them up front.
By no means should this have ever been considered a good team. But they’re better than this. They’re not going to finish the season with 50 points.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 6:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
56 is the worst anyone’s ever done with the shootout points in play. So it’d be a bad bet on your part unless you think this is the worst team of the past five years.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 17, 2009 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The coach and the GM were talking about competing for the playoffs. It wasn’t close to Paul Maurice’s insane “This team will compete for the Stanley Cup” although you’re okay to pretend that it was.
Where else would a defenceman that has averaged .70ppg be a household name? Likely in any city with any clue about hockey.
You can look at most predictions and they had the Leafs anywhere from 12th to 7th in the East.
You’ll have to point out ANYWHERE where Exelby’s been viewed as an all-star.
Kessel’s not a star? how many 21 year olds score 36 goals in the NHL?
Still, good work for your first baseless anti-Leafs rant. You don’t get full credit because you forgot to blame the fans.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 16, 2009 7:28 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Feel free to defend the indefensible; that’s your prerogative. Right now I’m just glad to be in San Jose and in first place, and not angry and in Mississagua.
by Fultron on Nov 16, 2009 11:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t forget to brush up on your heimlich manouvre.
by yrmom on Nov 17, 2009 3:15 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
LAFF
Alright. Feel free to keep making shit up.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 17, 2009 8:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah, the Sharks are chokers…like it would be so much better they miss the playoffs for what, 5, going on 6, seasons in a row.
Look, there’s no point in continuing this argument…I haven’t been in a flame war since, like, Grade 10, and you run a Leafs blog so your knowledge is way beyond mine and I don’t expect anything close to impartiality. But come on, man. The Leafs are within a hair of last place and aside from a shocker in Detroit, have only managed to beat the two other worst teams in the league.
Kaberle: Top D-man of the worst team defence in the league. Is he good? Yes, but taken in the context of the vacuum of skill in Toronto, he’s supposedly beyond great. I’m with James; like a lot of the team, he’s a 2 or 3 forced to be a hero. Compare him to Dan Boyle, who is pretty damn good in his own right. But here he’s only a piece of the puzzle…not the team All Star.
Is Kessel good? Sure, he had a great breakout season but I think questions about long-term durability and being able to carry a team on his own (and the two draft picks) are fair. Yet no one thought twice about letting rip on an established top forward (Dany Heatley) when he got shipped here. Be honest, how did you think he’d pan out?
Gustavsson? He’s only played 10 games and already he’s got all the headlines, but his .903 doesn’t even put him in the top 30 among netminders. I guess as long as he’s better than the other two sieves it justifies the big nickname and high profile. Meanwhile, Nabokov is a league leader routinely written off as a question mark in goal.
Does Exelby suck? Who cares…the very fact that I even know some third-rate D-man for the Leafs exists is enough to prove my point.
And what is my point? The Leafs are bad, and have been for many years…but with the press, the hype, the sold-out building, the history, the Leafs Nation, you’d never know it. If they were anywhere but Toronto, we wouldn’t even be having this conversation. There’s the Globe, the Star, the Sun, CBC HNIC, and TSN. The emergent hockey beat reporter in the biggest market in the world is forced to speculate about no-name AHL call-ups getting top line minutes, and the team isn’t even in IR trouble yet. Meanwhile all we’ve got in San Jose is first place, Drew Remenda’s massive dome, and Jamie frigging Baker doing brutal colour on some cock-rock radio station.
Now who’s making shit up?
by Fultron on Nov 17, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If there’s a market for coverage, it gets it. And the market for Leafs coverage is incredible. It is what it is: There are more beat writing jobs in Toronto, so there are more opportunities to cover the league here.
The Globe really does not dedicate a disproportionate amount of space to the Leafs… they’ve got six hockey writers, including one in Vancouver, two in Calgary and one in Montreal. And that’s with a huge percentage of the paper’s audience in the GTA.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 17, 2009 12:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No disrespect to you or the G&M intended.
Plenty for PPP and Farry Kraser.
by Fultron on Nov 17, 2009 12:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
listen dude, i can understand being frustrated at the crappy coverage your team gets and being super jealous of all the attention that the toronto maple leafs get, but dont get your panties tied in a knot about it.
Leaf fans know better than anyone how bad they have been the past few years, that doesnt mean we are going to stop disecting it though. We follow the team through thick and thin and enjoy debating what is going right and what is going wrong and how to fix it.
There must be another sharks fan out there somewhere that you could talk to about your favorite team. If not, you could just continue to waste your time ripping on the leafs, just like a ton of other people.
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 17, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, there is decent Sharks blog, local TV, and newspaper coverage out there. This site offers a bigger picture. And last I checked, it wasn’t exclusively a Leafs blog. Since the topic of the day was basically “Just how bad are the Leafs?”, don’t blame me for letting it rip.
by Fultron on Nov 17, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well, ok. you were the one complaining about jamie baker and how the leafs get all sorts of coverage on every little move the may or may not make.
keep rippin away, just dont complain about all the attention the leafs get when you are helping that very cause
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 17, 2009 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let rip all that you want but at least stay within the confines of reality and keep your “wah wah no one in Toronto cares about the Sharks” whining to yourself.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 17, 2009 3:17 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Breaking News! People care about hockey in Toronto, no one gives a fuck in California (relativley speaking)
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 17, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
HAHAHAHAHA
Wow. I don’t even know where to begin.
Yet no one thought twice about letting rip on an established top forward (Dany Heatley) when he got shipped here.
Cry me a river about San Jose not getting as much coverage in the Toronto media as the local sports team that happens to have the biggest fan base. So this is all because Dany Heatley caught a lot of flak for the way he handled his no-trade clause? Geez. Get over it. You picked up one of the league’s best finishers for 50 cents on the dollar. Cheer up.
Gustavsson? He’s only played 10 games and already he’s got all the headlines, but his .903 doesn’t even put him in the top 30 among netminders. I guess as long as he’s better than the other two sieves it justifies the big nickname and high profile. Meanwhile, Nabokov is a league leader routinely written off as a question mark in goal.
Maybe the hype came from being pegged by experts as the best goalie outside of the NHL and a lot of teams taking a run at signing him. His nickname existed long before he came to North America.
But here he’s only a piece of the puzzle…not the team All Star.
I must have missed the part where Tomas Kaberle was equated to a franchise player instead of a good PP quarterback that will consistently put up points. But sure, build up more strawmen.
Does Exelby suck? Who cares…the very fact that I even know some third-rate D-man for the Leafs exists is enough to prove my point.
He does suck. What point does it prove? That Leafs fans care about the team and not just the stars (when they are here) like you do?
The Leafs are bad, and have been for many years…but with the press, the hype, the sold-out building, the history, the Leafs Nation, you’d never know it.
It’s comments like that that make Canadians joke about non-traditional market fans having no clue what they are talking about.
your knowledge is way beyond mine
Congrats. You got one thing right.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 17, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yawn.
The team ain’t that great. The intense coverage magnifies the problem.
I’m done here.
by Fultron on Nov 17, 2009 3:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
thats right, people dont get angry in san jose. not until april at least….
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 17, 2009 12:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
All that has resulted so far is a strong argument the forwards were overachievers last season.
This is what kills me. The Leafs have had no trouble scoring since the lockout so I guess it’s four years of overachieving with a largely rotating cast of forwards and now, suddenly, when they’ve (in theory) added better defencemen and a better goalie (possibly the first since the lockout) they can’t score?
If it’s not one thing it’s another. FML
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 16, 2009 2:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Aren’t the Leafs 2nd in the league on the PP? There’s no shortage of firepower in Toronto. What could help their 5-on-5 play? Maybe if Wilson would keep the same lines together for more than 1 shift per game might be a start.
It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!
by hawks61 on Nov 16, 2009 6:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They are second this year but in three of the last four years they were in the bottom half of the league.
As for the blender, it’s not unique to Wilson and he actually does give lines some time to gel. Much moreso than Maurice seemed to but when things are going this badly it’s hard to give lines so much time to work out.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 16, 2009 7:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What ails the Leafs...
Is a 0.82% shooting percentage at even-strength in tie games this season:
http://www.behindthenethockey.com/2009/11/16/1159789/how-the-toronto-maple-leafs-have
They have outshot their opponents when the score is tied, but when you shoot that badly, you don’t win a lot of games.
by Hawerchuk on Nov 16, 2009 3:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
What ails the Leafs...
… is a bonehead GM.
They were going to struggle this year. That was a given. The Leafs have been run so badly for so long that they have had next to nothing in the system, and the Salary Cap makes full-out UFA rebuilds on the fly absolutely impossible to achieve.
And yet, Burke stupidly trying to rush the process by burning picks for Kessel actually made that bad situation worse. Now the Leafs are going to have to dip into the UFA pool every year to address their roster shortcomings, and they won’t know what those shortcomings are going to be much ahead of time.
It’s going to be GM’ing by fire drill.
by HockeyinHD on Nov 16, 2009 5:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's right
Because Phil Kessel is the weak point of this team.
At any rate, there’s been a good discussion of this stuff over at PPP for awhile now, and it’s worth a read. This season’s Leaf squad definitely isn’t the fault of Burke, though – not yet, anyway. He put together a squad of solid defensemen who, for whatever reason, are playing more or less like crap. Add to it a lot of young, second-or-third-line forwards who don’t have finish, a notable lack of leadership in the dressing room, a strange lack of accountability on the ice, and (discussed ad nauseum) shaky goaltending, and you’ve got a perfect storm of bad luck for a team that never seems to run out of bad luck.
by Vent on Nov 16, 2009 5:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s a little early to blame Burke after just 52 weeks on the job.
Not sure when acquiring a 21 year old 36 goal scorer became rushing the rebuilding proces. It’s not trading for a 30 something. It was a case of a GM looking at his team and believing that he had addressed it’s weaknesses and deciding that two mid-first round picks and a second were worth a lottery pick. If he had made the same pick this summer to grab Brayden Schenn at the draft people would have praised the move.
This season would have played out entirely differently so far if Gustavsson had not had the surgery and groin injury to start the year. That really put the team behind the eight ball.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 16, 2009 7:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This season would have played out entirely differently so far if Gustavsson had not had the surgery and groin injury to start the year. That really put the team behind the eight ball.
That certainly didn’t help their cause either, especially with Toskala performing so poorly that Wilson had to turn to journeyman Joey MacDonald to tend goal. One can only wonder that if Gustavsson had played a couple of those games early if that would’ve stemmed the bleeding a little. If anything else it would’ve put the onus on Toskala to perform at a much higher level as he would’ve never received the amount of playing time that he did.
It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!
by hawks61 on Nov 16, 2009 9:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s a testament to just how awful the Leafs’ goaltending has been in recent years that Gustavsson, who ranks 31st and 37th in Save % and GAA respectively, is seen as a bright spot on the roster.
by Richard S. Argent on Nov 16, 2009 10:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Err… look where Toskala is.
Gustavsson’s played fine for an undrafted rookie from Sweden that no one had heard of a year ago.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Nov 16, 2009 11:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
re: Toskala's stats
Err….that was kinda my point :)
by Richard S. Argent on Nov 16, 2009 11:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He was 9th and 11th respectively before the Minnesota Wild game.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 17, 2009 8:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know though… to be honest, I feel like the stats that have been churned out lately seem to suggest that it’s a team defense thing, not so much Toskala (although of course he shoulders some blame). Not that Toskala is a top tier goalie by any means, but it seems to suggest that the Leafs’ defensive woes are less Toskala performing “so poorly” as rather the whole team sort of just hangs him out to dry.
by Vinn on Nov 16, 2009 11:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve seen the numbers but to be honest this is a case where I don’t believe that they tell the story. Having watched every Leafs game since the lockout the goaltending has been the biggest issue by a mile and Toskala’s penchant for the back-breakin pillow goal doesn’t come through.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 17, 2009 8:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe they need more fighters!
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Nov 16, 2009 8:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe they just need the Love Guru.
by J. Michael Neal on Nov 17, 2009 10:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















