The Staubitz-Tootoo scrap
Boy, has this fight ever received a lot of coverage the past few days. Here's the latest, from The Tennessean's John Glennon:
Don't expect Predators forward Jordin Tootoo to extend a warm welcome to San Jose defenseman Brad Staubitz when the two teams meet tonight.
The unusual circumstances involving a fight between the two last week in San Jose prompted the Predators to call the matter to the NHL's attention.
Staubitz — in mixed martial-arts fashion — used his padded elbow to hammer Tootoo several times, bloodying Tootoo's face and forcing Tootoo to miss a large chunk of the game while getting medical attention.
Neither Tootoo, Predators General Manager David Poile nor league executives had ever seen such a tactic used. There's no specific rule that addresses it — or forbids it.
All right, so looking at the video, it's tough to see the elbow, but it does appear that at one point, that's what Staubitz is swinging. I'm not sure that it's intentional, but you can imagine the damage that would do:
It's incredible that Tootoo can walk after a beating like that. And that he might want a rematch tonight.
What do you think?
0 recs |
44 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Option
Where’s the option for
Illegal, except when fighting Tootoo, Ruutuu, Tucker, Ott, Cam Janssen, etc.
I vote for that one.
by Jibblescribbits on Mar 26, 2009 1:21 PM CDT reply actions 5 recs
also...
…can we add the “fan” in the Sommet Center that blows the whistle when Tootoo is on the ice to Jibblescribbits list of exceptions ?
by mc keeper on Mar 26, 2009 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that fan?
don’t you mean the hundreds of fans at the Sommet that blow the thing?
Welcome to Smashville, Tennessee.
by Aditya T (smashville) on Mar 26, 2009 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if this is discouraged here, but
+1
Add Chris Neil to that list too.
Shut up when you're talking to me!
by Afino on Mar 26, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can rec his comment instead of posting “+1”. It will keep a running tally of how many people recommended the comment and will highlight it once two or more people rec it.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
by Chemmy on Mar 26, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn technology replacing useless comments!
Shut up when you're talking to me!
by Afino on Mar 26, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, you can actually recommend just about everything on SB Nation sites. It’s too bad the function doesn’t get used more often.
by James Mirtle on Mar 26, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I knew i was forgetting someone. I couldn’t think of the guy’s name for the life of me when making the list
by Jibblescribbits on Mar 26, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m with Jibble on this one. Elbowing is a big no-no, but as far as I’m concerned, anyone can do anything they want to Tootoo.
I laughed hysterically the first time I saw this fight on On The Fly Final, and every time I’ve watched it on youtube since, it makes me laugh. So good to see Tootoo get a bit of what he deserves.
by IAmJoe on Mar 26, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Dion?
1) Jibble surprised you didn’t have you’re favourite, Dion Phaneuf on your list!
2) It was different, but shouldn’t be disallowed. We need fewer rules on fighting, not more!
by Fauxrumors on Mar 26, 2009 1:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
Like he would ever get into a fight if he thought it might hurt his face.
by Jibblescribbits on Mar 26, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not like he could get any uglier than he already is.
by Habs on Mar 26, 2009 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was pretty sure fighting was illegal
Don’t worry, though, I’m pretty sure the players will police the game by challenging Staubitz to a fight.
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Mar 26, 2009 1:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
@Back in Black
Agreed… lets not forget that by banning “the use of the elbow” the NHL would be condoning punching players in the face with your fist (what fighting is now) I say keep the rules as they are, if something seems inappropriate, asses it on a case by case basis.
99 times out of 100 a charging penalty deserves 2 minutes, but every now and again a neck is broken or concussion issued and suddenly there are fines and suspensions. This seems similar.
by refaris on Mar 26, 2009 1:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I swear if I had an option © that read “I just want to nitpick the poll question” that half of you guys would pick that one every time!
Tough coming up with the right way to word this one … I guess the question is, should there be an additional punishment for elbowing during a fight?
by James Mirtle on Mar 26, 2009 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I beg to differ – I think “half” is way on the low end of the scale. I’d go 80% nitpickers at least. :)
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on Mar 26, 2009 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t really mean to take issue with the poll question; I just wanted to point out the absurdity of having “rules of engagement” for activity that’s already (officially) outside the rules…
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Mar 26, 2009 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, you see guys get clocked with elbows all the time in a fight. You’re swinging wildly, and sometimes you miss and kind of cuff him with the inside of your forearm, sometimes you cuff him with the back of it. When it comes down to it, most fights in this league consist of “put your head down and swing”. Given that Staubitz never blatantly elbowed Tootoo, and considering the rapid-fire punches Staubitz is repeatedly connecting with, I’d guess that any elbowing here was accidental. Its certainly not like Staubitz needed to bust out some MMA moves here, he pretty handily smashed Tootoo’s face in with his fists alone.
Watching specifically for the elbow, it looks like Staubitz connects real solid with an elbow at the 0:36 mark, but its in the course of trying to throw a series of punches. Then Staubitz continues delivering fast punches to Tootoo’s face, switching between left and right. I don’t see anything suspension worthy here. If he led with the elbow in the first place, then yeah, its dirty. But he’s punching, he’s punching, and Tootoo is ducking under them, and then he tries to punch his lowered head, and Tootoo raises his head then, and his elbow just goes into his face. File this one away under “shit happens”.
by IAmJoe on Mar 26, 2009 1:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
While we are on the subject, can we get rid of the “blood is an automatic major” penalty? (for high sticking etc…)
by refaris on Mar 26, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blood isn’t an autommatic major. Its an automatic double minor with the discretion of the ref to make it 5
by Fauxrumors on Mar 26, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s actually not automatic either, its just that the refs call it that way. A ref actually has the discretion to say “hey, you’re bleeding, but I’m still only going to give that guy a single minor”. I’m not sure how or why it started being called the way it is, I just know that it simply is.
by IAmJoe on Mar 26, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rule 61 b.
"When a player carries or holds any part of his stick above the shoulders of the opponent so that injury results, the Referee shall:
Assess a double minor penalty for all contact that causes an injury, whether accidental or careless, in the opinion of the Referee."
"Without good hard work, it is impossible to reach the pinnacle of success." - Anatoli Tarasov
by PRC on Mar 26, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Injury does not equate to blood. The rule book is written and intended to be interpreted literally.
There’ve been interviews with refs and officials before where it has been mentioned that the criteria is “injury inflicted by the high stick”, not “did the high stick cut you?”. If you poke someone in the eye with your stick, you might not draw blood, but you’ve still injured them, and it should draw a 4:00. Blood is generally seen as being indicative of an injury, although a little cut can certainly be less injury than high sticks I’ve seen that still only draw 2:00.
by IAmJoe on Mar 26, 2009 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t really see how this is all that different from Sheldon Souray facing a match penalty and the threat of suspension for wearing a wrist brace in a fight. http://www.edmontonjournal.com/sports/hockey/edmonton-oilers/Souray+date+with+Campbell/1209026/story.html
If Staubitz was intentionally using his elbows to land hits, then this would constitute intent to injure (not that using fists isn’t…).
"Without good hard work, it is impossible to reach the pinnacle of success." - Anatoli Tarasov
by PRC on Mar 26, 2009 2:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think that anyone disagrees that using your elbows intentionally is dirty and worthy of further punishment. Its just that he really doesn’t appear that he deliberately used his elbow to hit Tootoo. Tootoo ducked under the first two punches, then Staubitz adjusts and tries to punch down into where Tootoo’s head is, but Tootoo pops his head back up, and promptly ends up with an elbow in his face.
by IAmJoe on Mar 26, 2009 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah. There are league approved ways to try to inflict brain damage on your opponent. We can’t have people freelancing on this. Someone might get seriously hurt, as opposed to the proper way to fight, where it’s merely the case that someone might get seriously hurt.
by J. Michael Neal on Mar 26, 2009 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rule 43 BTW.
"Without good hard work, it is impossible to reach the pinnacle of success." - Anatoli Tarasov
by PRC on Mar 26, 2009 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is where the NHL needs to make up their mind… fighting is all fun and games (sells tickets, gets fans excited) but as soon as a “serious injury” occurs it sparks major controversy. What did you think was going to happen?!
by refaris on Mar 26, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
But Souray got away with it while Weller was out with a concussion. Souray got away scot-free, just like Staubitz will. If Staubitz doesn’t, look for Risebrough to throw a fit.
by nathaneide on Mar 26, 2009 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was disappointed (but frankly, not surprised) by Colin Campbells’ shrug of the shoulders on it. If his stance is really that there’s no rule that says you can’t use an elbow in a fight, then why not just pick a stick up and smash a guy over the head?
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
by Dirk Hoag on Mar 26, 2009 2:12 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
why not just pick a stick up and smash a guy over the head?
Because there is a rule against that. :P
by IAmJoe on Mar 26, 2009 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And there is a rule against Elbowing… your point?
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
by Dirk Hoag on Mar 26, 2009 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are rules against punching guys in the face, too, and both were penalized for that.
by James Mirtle on Mar 26, 2009 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why not just pick a stick up and smash a guy over the head?
Because a gun is much more permanent.
I dunno — sounds like elbow-fighting could be an issue, but I don’t think this is the example to prove it.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Mar 26, 2009 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We should ask the guys over at Hockey-fights.com whether there’s any historical precedent for that.
Shut up when you're talking to me!
by Afino on Mar 26, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m afraid I don’t agree. One cannot be certain that Staubitz is purposely using his elbows to hit him. To me this just seems like a much better fighter doing what a better fighter does in a fight.
To say this action should be outlawed is to question fighting in hockey in general, which you’re free to do, but to say that Staubitz did something wrong here is akin to saying Mike Tyson should have been arrested after he knocked out Michael Spinks.
by Costa24 on Mar 26, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Colin Campbell
was clueless as a coach, and he’s been even dopier as a VP. Remember when the NHL said “the length of suspensions for illegal blows to the head will be increased if these incidents persist across the League?” Yea, well then they went out gave guys 2-5 game repeatedly for headshots.
Saying you’re going to do something, and then completely ignoring it over and over? Yeah, way to protect the players there Colie.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
by poploser on Mar 26, 2009 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whether he did it intentionally or not, we’re now at a point in hockey where more and more guys are taking boxing and MMA lessons, with the specific aim of becoming better fighters.
Its just a matter of time until the league has to ban something like this – because it will be seen as somehow less “pure” than “regular” fighting with ones fists. And it will highlight the pure idiocy of trying to justify, as “part of the game”, people hitting each other in the face. And then we’ll be one step closer to finally getting rid of fighting entirely
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
by poploser on Mar 26, 2009 3:03 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Couldn't tell, but...
I honestly couldn’t tell (from that video, anyway). After a few viewings, Staubitz’s forearm/elbows didn’t look any different to me than Tootoo’s punch follow-throughs earlier in the fight, although obviously there was a different result.
I’m no anti-fighting crusader, but it always feels like an out-of-body experience every time we hockey fans discuss what the “rules” should be to keep things fair for this “illegal” interaction that is “part of the game” and allows players to “police themselves” within the … um, rules.
MMA tactics seem inevitable; it will be high comedy to watch the league try to sift those tactics out. Like Romans debating the rules of Lions v. Christians, mixed with “Who’s on First?” (“No, see, it’s okay to bludgeon a guy’s ear with your fist, but you can’t elbow drop his ear – that wouldn’t be fair. And you can concuss him with a fist to the jaw or the temple, but he needs to keep his helmet on in case he falls and gets a concussion. But he can’t fight with a visor; that’s just unfair. Anytime you score a knockout and quite possibly make his life after 50 miserable and confusing, you should immediately check to see if he’s okay. It’s the honorable thing.”)
Fighting in hockey is like bull fighting: Romanticized, ritualized, part of the culture — yet totally absurd from the outside looking in.
Lighthouse Hockey: SBN's New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
by Dominik on Mar 26, 2009 3:19 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
compared to the comments from the (surprise surprise) Nashville beat writer, the video is pretty inconclusive. I think he missed his punches and maybe while missing thought to stick the elbow out.
-Kevin Forbes
Hockey's Future
by kforbes on Mar 26, 2009 4:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’ve watched the fight dozens of times this past week, and I honestly cannot see how Staubitz intentionally landed elbows/forearms/whatever people are accusing him of. His punches are wild at first, with him just trying to land them, and then he “finds his range,” as Drew Remenda states, and just repeatedly hammers Tootoo in the face with his fist. He follows through with his punches, which would explain the alleged elbows since he was missing the mark in the first part of the fight.
Oh, and I doubt that it was just the elbow that bloodied Tootoo, as the journalist suggests – did he see those dozen or so hooks right to Tootoo’s face? And then those uppercuts when Staubitz switched hands? There may have been an elbow at the beginning, but there was also a lot more “legal” punches that landed that would certainly cause injury. Hard ones, too, judging by the fact that Staubitz was icing his hands after the fight.
Granted, I am a Sharks fan that absolutely loved seeing Staubitz do something outside of taking an ill-timed penalty, so I’m a bit biased. But I honestly did not see any intentional elbowing in there.
by mymclife on Mar 26, 2009 4:57 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I saw this for the first time, I really don’t see the problem. He was swinging away and his elbow seemed to make contact a few times, didn’t look intentional.
When I read the description, I thought I was going to see Staubitz come down on his head with his elbow several times. It isn’t illegal and I don’t think it should be.
by hallock on Mar 26, 2009 8:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















