From The Rink: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Anonymous Eagle covering Marquette!

The bracket racket: 2009 NHL playoff predictions

ROUND 1

Eastern Conference

(1) Boston v. (8) Montreal
Series key: Carey Price

A rematch of last season's great series, albeit with the seedings reversed. The Habs are a bit beat up, but not so much so that they won't be ready for battle in this one, and I think this will likely be the most physical series in the first round. Boston's better built for a war, but I do think this series will take something out of them heading forward. There's a lot of pressure on some key Bruins like Tim Thomas, Zdeno Chara and Marc Savard here, but this team has been the class of the East all season and should be able to handle a Montreal team that's been in the headlines for the wrong reasons all year. One bad goal against on Price could open the floodgates.

Bruins in 6

 

 

(2) Washington v. (7) NY Rangers
Series key: Theodore v. Lundqvist

The defence has been much-maligned in New York all year, but the team's brutal offence — led by a Conference-worst power play — should be among the key concerns. The Rangers didn't have a single player top 58 points this season, and will have to be ultra-disciplined in order to limit Ovechkin and company's chances. Their one edge comes in goal, but if Jose Theodore's competent for the Caps, this shouldn't be close given all Washington's firepower.

Capitals in 5

 



(3) New Jersey v. (6) Carolina
Series key: Parise v. Staal

For me, this is the toughest first-round series to call. Frankly, it could go either way, and a lot of it depends on (a) how well Marty Brodeur plays and (b) who out of Zach Parise and Eric Staal continues their 40+ goal form in the playoffs. The Hurricanes will also need the Rod Brind'Amour and Cam Ward of the past 30 or so games to show up, and Anton Babchuk to continue to play like, well, not Anton Babchuk. It'll be a long one. Flip a coin.

Hurricanes in 7

 



(4) Pittsburgh v. (5) Philadelphia
Series key: Richards v. Malkin/Crosby

The post-deadline Penguins are an awful lot tougher team to shutdown than they were the first five months of the season. Chris Kunitz and Bill Guerin have both worked quite well with Crosby so far, and the addition of Sergei Gonchar — who has put up nearly a point a game since his return — has been huge at both ends of the ice (although Dan Bylsma hasn't used him in much of a shutdown role). Malkin meanwhile seems able to produce offence no matter who he's out there with. For their part, the Flyers have had some excellent defensive performances up front, and Mike Richards could limit at least one of the super duo to relatively ordinary production. Where I really worry about Philadelphia is in goal, and I wouldn't be surprised if we see both goaltenders play at some point early in the series. The quality of the Flyers' blueline drops off significantly beyond Kimmo Timonen (who has been terrific this season) and Braydon Coburn and will definitely run into matchup issues against at least one of the Pens top lines. Besides, Pittsburgh strikes me as hungry after last year's whiff in the finals.

Penguins in 6

 




Western Conference

(1) San Jose v. (8) Anaheim
Series key: Jonas Hiller

Talk about a brutal eighth seed to draw in Round 1. Anaheim's biggest issue all season was in goal, where J.S. Giguere really struggled following the death of his father, and with Hiller in net, the Ducks posted a very solid 23-15-1 record with a .919 save percentage. In fact, Hiller's career numbers are terrific — there just aren't all that many of them (and none in the playoffs). And he'll be the starter going into Game 1. Good luck predicting how that'll go. As for the Sharks, well, they've had plenty of playoff chokes to this point, albeit under a different head coach, and it's going to be interesting to see if Todd McLellan can keep Joe Thornton on top of his game throughout another gruelling playoffs. That said, this is a far deeper and balanced team than the one that fell short last season, especially on the blueline, and I bet this is a low-scoring series that relies on special teams for a lot of its goals. In order to upset, Anaheim needs to be well disciplined — something it's struggled at as the West's most penalized team — and get some more magic out of Bobby Ryan. Expect the Battle of California to take something out of whoever advances.

Sharks in 6

 



(2) Detroit v. (7) Columbus
Series key: Nash v. Datsyuk/Zetterberg

It's so very, very tempting to take the upset here, but I can't quite bring myself to do it, not when it's just as easy to imagine Pavel Datsyuk and friends stifling the few offensive weapons Columbus has. There's a huge discrepancy in this series when it comes to these teams' regular season power play figures (first against worst) and no matter how good Steve Mason is in goal, he can't overcome that. The Blue Jackets are an underrated crew, especially on the blueline, but they just don't have the sort of scoring punch that can overcome what they'll face in this one. My money's still on Hitch making it interesting. 

Red Wings in 7

 



(3) Vancouver v. (6) St. Louis
Series key: Sedins and the playoff jinx

You've got to tip your hat to Mike Gillis. No one looked at the roster he went into this season with and saw a team with balanced scoring and solid defence, and that's exactly what Vancouver looks like these days given the play of Alex Burrows, Ryan Kesler and Willie (Bill Pickle) Mitchell. I don't think this series will be a cakewalk for the Canucks, but I also see there being a little bit of a letdown for the plucky Blues, who have to be simply happy to be here at this point. The caveat? The Sedin twins have quietly had a phenomenal year in Vancouver, heavily outscoring difficult opposition all season (Daniel's close to Datysuk territory at 5-on-5), but their career playoff numbers aren't impressive at all and they're the guys carrying much of the load on this team. The reason the Canucks have had success is that the secondary scoring has stepped up, but that only holds if the No. 1 guys can continue to produce. Vancouver's hot streak over the tail end of the season was driven in large part by the Sedins' dominance, so the question is: Can they keep it up in what will likely be a physical, low-scoring series? If the answer's yes, the Canucks are a Cup contender given the way Luongo's likely to play.

Canucks in 6

 



(4) Chicago v. (5) Calgary
Series key: Flames battered blueline

For whatever reason, Nikolai Khabibulin has dominated Calgary in his career. In the regular season, his record is 22-5-2 all-time against the Flames, and coming off an excellent campaign and playing for his next contract, I bet the Bulin Wall's strong showing continues. Chicago isn't getting a lot of credit after a pretty impressive season, and a lot of their success does rest with some pretty young bodies, but I have to believe the Keith-Seabrook combination's dominance during the year against top opposition will continue. Add in the fact that Anders Eriksson's about to play a role on Calgary's blueline, and you have to believe the magic keeps coming for the 'Hawks. Playoff games at a soldout United Center are going to make for must-see TV.

Blackhawks in 7

 



The bracket

Last year, I had the Red Wings dumping the Rangers in the finals, a situation that was mucked up a bit when the Penguins dusted off New York in Round 2. I've only got one first-round upset this time around — the Hurricanes over the Devils — but I bet there's at least one more.

Everyone's picking the Sharks this season, and I just can't bring myself to do it given what we've seen out of them in the postseason the past few years. I'd also be surprised to see a Cup win by either Detroit or Boston, which leaves a couple unlikely candidates in the finals in my wacky bracket.

My guess is we haven't yet seen the best out of Crosby this season, and Roberto Luongo's about to finally get some goal support in the playoffs:

Nhl_playoff_bracket_medium

Greg Wyshynski and I will have a playoff preview chat both here and at Puck Daddy beginning at 1 p.m. today, and there'll also be a Globe Sports podcast featuring Eric Duhatschek up shortly after that.

0 recs  |  Comment 37 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Canucks to the finals?

You’re such a homer, James. :)

Just some of my playoff ramblings….

-I’d like to think Steve Mason steals that Detroit/CBJ series as well, but I don’t think it will happen.
-I actually agree with you on both Conference Final matchups, and with Vancouver taking the West. Why? Roberto Luongo. I’m actually backing the Blues and don’t want to see them lose in the first round, but I think Luongo eventually gets the better of St. Louis.
-Same in the East, except I think not having Hossa/Malone really does Pittsburgh in earlier this year. Boston’s just a better overall team, top to bottom, than Pittsburgh is.
- I’m actually worried about Pittsburgh even getting past Philly. That’s also a coin flip in my eyes.
- I think Carolina’s peaked too early. However, they still should get past the Devils. Two big things worry me though for Carolina, and that is trying to keep the Devils’ big guns off the scoreboard. I don’t think they have the defensive horses to do so. And 2, if Brodeur’s still steaming about 2006 and turns up his game even more, who knows….
- Chicago’s going to wipe the United Center floor with Calgary. And that’s awesome for those fans in Chicago.
- Not even a mention of Sean Avery in the Washington/Rangers series? James, you have a short memory of what he can do to a goalie…I still think Washington wins, but that’s not going to be easy.

Of course, all these come with one big caveat: You never know which goalies are going to get hot.

My picks:

BOS in 5
WSH in 6
CAR in 7
PIT in 7

SJ in 7
DET in 5
VAN in 7
CHI in 4

BOS in 6 over CAR
PIT in 7 over WSH

CHI in 6 over SJ
VAN in 6 over DET

BOS in 7 over PIT
VAN in 7 over CHI

BOS in 6 over VAN

Conn Smythe: Tim Thomas

Shut up when you're talking to me!

by Afino on Apr 15, 2009 7:47 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Heh, Canucks fans can’t stand me as I don’t think I’ve ever predicted them to do anything. This year’s team has really impressed me, though.

by James Mirtle on Apr 16, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let the Battles begin!

1) Bettman would love a return of the Pens to the Finals. The canucks, not so much. They’d probably prefer the Hawks or Sharks
2) We’re looking forward to both state battles as we believe the Battle of California/Pennsylvania will be the marquis series to watch for fans. All are talented/tough teams that don’t like eachother!

by Fauxrumors on Apr 15, 2009 8:55 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Another thing I noticed

There’s an awful lot of people on the Carolina bandwagon as a “sleeper” pick.

How can they be all over them when they’re a coin flip to even get past the Devils?

Shut up when you're talking to me!

by Afino on Apr 15, 2009 9:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Pens in the Finals eh James? I really like their top guys but do they have enough depth to make a deep run? I am not so sure. And in the West, I could definitely see the Canucks making a run but the West is such a meat grinder I really don’t know who is going to advance out of there. I still like the team coming out of the West as the favorite though. Good picks!

The population of Pominville keeps rising!

by Blackcapricorn on Apr 15, 2009 9:34 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I know Gonchar's back

And I realize that Crosby and Malkin are exceptional talents who can make exceptional things happen. Also, I’m probably starting to sound like a stuck record at playoff time. But:

If a team that finished 8th overall wins the Stanley Cup, it will be unprecedented in the history of the National Hockey League. There are a lot of good teams this year, with higher seeds.

Caveat: I’m picking Montreal to upset Boston for no good reason other than history, so perhaps I’m putting a little too much emphasis on the past…

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Apr 15, 2009 9:40 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

About 200 writers picked San Jose-Boston, so they’ve provided great reading material on that matchup.

Frankly, Pittsburgh’s not an eighth-place team the way they’re currently constructed.

by James Mirtle on Apr 15, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hate to get pedantic, but they are, by definition, an eighth place team. What you’re saying (and I agree) is that they’re better than their record indicates.

What I’m skeptical of is that they’re good enough to knock off Philadelphia and
Washington and Boston in succession, and then still have enough in the tank to beat whoever comes out of the West. You didn’t pick any of those series to go seven games, but they all could. As I said, it would be an unprecedented feat.

On the other hand, I’m all for not picking San Jose-Boston. That’s just lazy.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Apr 15, 2009 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We’ve seen tons of low-seeded teams make the finals. Why not the Pens?

by James Mirtle on Apr 15, 2009 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, it would not be unprecedented. The Devils in ’95 were seeded ninth I believe.

by James Mirtle on Apr 15, 2009 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The ‘95 NHL season started in January and was only 48 games long. I’m willing to exclude that outlier as distinct from every other season.

The ’91 Penguins finished 7th overall, but they did win their division title, which at the time guaranteed them home ice through the first two rounds.

And that’s it; no other team that finished lower than sixth has ever won. On this basis, I say it would be unprecedented for the 8th overall Penguins to win.

Note that an exceptional circumstance the ‘91 Penguins had was the presence of Mario Lemieux, a singular talent who scored 44 points in 23 playoff games (and won me 40 bucks in a playoff pool). This year’s Penguins have two players with that extremely rare level of potential. If any team lower than 6th is ever going to win it, I’d bet on the ‘09 Pens. I’m just pointing out that it has never happened before.

Making the finals and losing, of course, has lots of precedents.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Apr 16, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heck, if the Pens are in the finals and lose to Detroit/San Jose/Vancouver, I’ll consider my prediction pretty solid.

At least compared to the monkey.

by James Mirtle on Apr 16, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe the ’93 Habs were also a 7th overall team. I know at least one other one was, because I did the legwork.

So 8th isn’t totally out of line, especially considering how bad they were pre-Bylsma/Gonchar, just a bit out of the ordinary.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there)

by Doogie2K on Apr 16, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The ‘93 Habs were 6th. I’ve done legwork on this too; I’m not sure why our numbers are different.

…except that I missed the ’86 Habs, who were 7th. Oops. The only explanation I have for that one is that it was a fluke playoff year where the best record they played against was the #6 Flames (and yes, they had a famous goalie).

Still not 8th though; still unprecedented.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Apr 16, 2009 6:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well good. Makes for a better pick when it comes true.

by James Mirtle on Apr 16, 2009 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It absolutely will come true

Despite what I wrote, something inside me tells me that Pittsburgh will come through with the Cup this year. Bank on it.

Also, I’m taking back my Habs over Bruins prediction. These comments don’t come with a timestamp, do they?

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Jun 15, 2009 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not exactly. There have been a couple of 6’s and 7’s, and one 10 (the ‘95 Devils). It’s unusual, but not quite unprecedented.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there)

by Doogie2K on Apr 15, 2009 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see Anders Eriksson’s notoriety extends outside of Calgary…

Sigh.

by Kent Wilson on Apr 15, 2009 9:55 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Penguins Depth

You people who say the Pens have NO depth, Have no clue what you’re talking about, Do you even watch hockey past your favorite Teams

Pascal Dupuis who was on the 1st Line Last season with Crosby & Hossa is Now on the 4th Line

Sid wasn’t Healthy last playoffs & their 3rd Line of Tyler Kennedy – Jordan Staal -Matt Cooke could Very well be the best 3rd Line in the playoffs

by Evilpens on Apr 15, 2009 10:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree that the Pens lack of depth is blown out of proportion (though I’m not sure people feel this way anymore after the trades of Guerin and Kunitz), but bringing up Dupuis and Kennedy doesn’t help your argument.

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Apr 15, 2009 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You got a point Fauxrumors

We have, as of late, seen a lot of small market teams win the cup…
And that is just cool if they do it without help from their friends.

This time however you can argue that Chicago and San Jose doesn’t need to have their area developed in relation to fan base – so there might just be a chance it will be settled by the players.

Look for the zebras to be kind to the Habs (100 year), but it can’t be enough to beat the Bruins.

On the predictions I think there should be a rule of you having to predict at least two teams from the lower half. Just for making it more interesting.

However I agree that Cannucks and Penguins, without getting serious hurt, will go all the way. But that it is the thing with picking the final two, imagine Luongo getting hurt in the first game.. (knock on wood).

by chester144 on Apr 15, 2009 10:18 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Vancouver

Glad to see I’m not the only one impressed enough with the Canucks to see them beating the Red Wings … homer pick or not, it’s a good matchup against the nothing to lose Blues … Imagine Alex Burrows if he had power play time (28 G, 51 Pts) where he a grand total of zero points.

by Kats Hockey on Apr 15, 2009 10:50 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice picks, James.

Though it’d be a lot of fun to see a Canucks playoff run again like 94 (even if BC is pretty brutual for bandwagon jumpers), I’m not sure they can handle back-to-back series against the Wings and Sharks.

by DarrenM on Apr 15, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Don’t let these guys get you down James.

Your intuition is just fine.

'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.

by Yankee Canuck on Apr 15, 2009 11:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Past playoff success is probably one of the least accurate predictors of future playoff success. That said, the Sharks are a lot weaker in goal than most people think.

I can’t see Columbus pushing the Wings to 7 games: they’re the weakest playoff team in the West, Mason has been average for a long time now, and Detroit hasn’t played a game 7 in a long time. Somehow, all their series seem to end in six games, win or lose.

I really can’t imagine Carolina over Jersey. Carolina just isn’t that good a team. Cam Ward is playing way above his head. They’ll need a lot of luck for that to continue and for them to be Jersey.

I’ll be surprised if either of the teams you picked make it to the finals, too.

by RyanV on Apr 15, 2009 12:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Okay, but which teams will upset in the first round? It’s not going to be 1-4 in Round 2 on both sides.

by James Mirtle on Apr 15, 2009 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Detroit is the ripest pick for an upset in the West.

I’m not sure that the key matchup here will be Nash vs. Detroit’s Forwards, but rather Mason vs. Osgood/Conklin. Osgood’s been flat-out terrible and Conklin is getting far too much praise for a .909 SV% — as far as I’m concerned, this series rests on them. Remember, Columbus tagged these same guys for 8 goals barely a month ago.

If I’m choosing between season-long shaky goaltending vs. frontrunner for the Calder & Vezina…

"Without good hard work, it is impossible to reach the pinnacle of success." - Anatoli Tarasov

by PRC on Apr 15, 2009 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Detroit’s playoff chances don’t rest on either Osgood or Conklin. They rest on two great lines and one of the three best defensemen in history. This myth that the key to winning in the playoffs is always the goalies is just that: a myth. Osgood was the man in the nets for two Stanley Cup winners, and he was then what he is now, and always has been: a goalie that’s somewhere around mediocre. If they have to put him in, I won’t be all that worried, because it’s not his fault if they lose. It’s the fault of the guys who were supposed to carry the team.

As for giving too much credit to Conklin, I’m not. He’s mediocre, too. However, mediocre isn’t terrible, and it is enough for this team to win. If they do’t, blame the guys collecting bigger paychecks, because they won’t have gotten it done.

by J. Michael Neal on Apr 15, 2009 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Osgood wasn’t mediocre this season.

by James Mirtle on Apr 15, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like those predictions. Although as a Canucks fan, I have a touch of fear about a first-round upset, as the Blues seem to match up pretty well…and if Vancouver makes it as far as meeting San Jose, I wouldn’t give them good odds of winning — they just look weak every time they play the Sharks. But you never know in the playoffs…San Jose’s been upset before, and sometimes the chips fall just right for a team. If I imagine the Canucks playing Chicago in the Western Final, then suddenly the Cup dream doesn’t sound so ridiculous.

Then again, whoever comes out of the west may have to go through both Detroit and San Jose, which sounds insurmountable…so the bulk of the pundits will probably be right in calling one of those two teams to make the final.

by headspacej on Apr 15, 2009 12:42 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I just don’t think that the Canucks have it.

I’ll take the Blackhawks over the Bruins

by Ebscer on Apr 15, 2009 1:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I’ll stick with the first round only for now

Boston in 5 =(
Washington in 6
New Jersey in 7
Philadelphia in 7 (this series is a coin flip)

San Jose in 5
Detroit in 5
Vancouver in 6
Chicago in 5

by Costa24 on Apr 15, 2009 2:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I really, really doubt Vancouver beats St. Louis, Detroit AND San Jose. The Blues alone will give them a good fight, though I think they will prevail.

by Resolute on Apr 15, 2009 3:17 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow

My bracket is very similar, except I have the Bruins beating the Pens in the Eastern Final and winning the Cup. I have the Hurricanes over the Devils, and the Canucks coming out of the West.

Have they closed Rinkatology already? I wanted to set one up there, but it looks closed.

More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.

by Dirk Hoag on Apr 15, 2009 4:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes, I registered as well hoping to sneak in before they closed, but it looks like I was too late.

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Apr 15, 2009 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If The Penguins

win the cup i’m going to act like I dont know what hockey is..

by Ryan McFadden on Apr 16, 2009 11:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to SBN's blog on all things hockey

Start posting on From The Rink »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Ice Edge Holdings? I don`t think so!
Dave_hockey_pic_small
My Olympic Hockey Tournament Game Over Ramblings
Gary_bettman_bad_dreams_small
2010 U.S. v Canada = 1980 U.S. v Soviet Union? Why It Doesn't, and Why It Does
Small
Burke and a premeptive whine
Small
Ice edge out?
One_lindsay05_small
Getzlaf injured; Olympics in question?
Small
Lightning sale imminent-what about PHX?
Small
Dave Tippett for the Jack Adams award!
Small
Raffle
Small
Collective Intelligence or Popular Delusions:Visualizing NHL Trade, Award Rumors

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Blog extras


Bloggers-in-chief

Awkwardmarleau_small Mike Chen

Editors

Penguins_cup_08__small FrankD

Canes-country-logo_small Bob Harwood Waeghe

Cc_cory_small Cory Lavalette

Gabby_small Joe Fortunato

Moderator(s)

Calvin_small PPP

643c0d9c_small saskhab