Crosby and the media spotlight
The media demands for the two men at the centre of the Crosby v. Ovechkin matchup have been simply incredible the past few days. For one player more than the other, it seems.
For all the criticism he's faced for being bland, Crosby was the one on the front lines in media appearances yesterday, on ESPN, with the print media — everywhere — talking about something he's been asked to talk about far too often in his career.
Ovechkin. The rivalry.
You know the rest.
The interesting thing from my perspective is that what Crosby began saying was actually, well, interesting. And I think, over time, we'll see more and more of that as he comes of age.
He does, after all, have a bit of an advantage over his "rival."
As much as you have to love Ovechkin's enthusiam, his grasp of the language still isn't quite there. His quotes come with words missing, his thoughts — in English, anyway — are not quite fully formed. The hockey media's obviously not looking for Shakespeare, but I wouldn't be surprised if, when the networks want their sound bite, it's Crosby they begin to go to more and more.
His thoughts on Ovechkin yesterday show, in my mind, a growing maturity and a greater understanding of what the media's asking of him (as repetitive as it may seem).
"We're different people, that's the bottom line, and people like to make a lot of stories behind that," Crosby said. "Some people like his style, some people like my style, it doesn't matter. We're just different and that's why I think a lot of people find it interesting. Because you have two guys who've had success pretty early in their careers and do it a different way or show it in a different way.
"Yes, it's a rivalry ... but I don't know how you want to describe it. What's a rivalry? It's intense. We compete and we're competitive, and usually when we play each other we both try to raise our games."
And how does he feel about his so-called rival?
"Do I wake up hoping to see Ovechkin fail? No, I don't," Crosby said. "He's a guy I play against and he's a great player and we're competitive against each other but, you know what? There's an element there where the media puts us up against each other, and that's just the way it is. We're not best friends, but a lot of that [animosity] is made up."
And Ovechkin's take on his "relationship" with Crosby?
"Just normal. We're not friends, we don't call each other every day, but when we see each other we just shake hands, you know, what's going on, ask each other, something like that. But nothing serious."
Crosby's not dead wood, but I can see why Alex Semin made the comparison earlier this year. There aren't many 21-year-old athletes with anything compelling to say, especially when faced with the same silly questions everyday, but I think Crosby's beginning to catch on and offering a little more than some of his peers.
We're starting to see what he could be, and it's not a role unlike the one Gretzky took on when he went to Los Angeles 20 years ago. Hockey needs a face in the U.S., someone instantly recognizable even to the casual fans, and it needs to be someone at least a little bit compelling.
He's working on it.
0 recs |
15 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Good takes on the situation James. Its tough to remember he is really young and he has a lot of pressure to be the face of the Pens, of the “new” NHL and Reebok in Canada and so I understand his trepidation in giving any more than bland answers.
In terms of this “rivalry” thing, I always thought it was overblown. Usually, it seems that someone asks Ovie or Semin or someone else about Crosby and they say something somewhat derogatory and “bam” rivalry, controversy! I think Ovie/Semin and the rest think the same way Crosby does at the end of the day, great player on the other side of the ice, let’s try to elevate my play the next game. Its the fans that latch onto these things and take it in the very stupid “crysby” direction.
The population of Pominville keeps rising!
by Blackcapricorn on May 1, 2009 12:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I almost cringed when the Hurricanes beat the Devils— because I knew the media was going to do 2 weeks of Crosby vs Ovechkin stories….
Very good writeup though James. It must be tough for a 21 year old to face the same, stupid, pointless questions day after day. Just like hockey, interviewing is a learned skill too. He’s getting better….
Blackcapricorn: I totally agree….. its the fans that get into the “Cindy” Crosby stuff. But if they’re both going to elevate there game, its going to be a helluva series…
Cheers,
Matt
www.viewfrommyseats.com
by Cheap Seats on May 1, 2009 12:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ovechkin vs. Crosby. The series itself might be worth watching, but I am going to avoid it because I already find it bad enough that the media invented rivalry is starting to gain traction in reality. And really, nobody, not CBC, not Versus, not the Globe or the National Post or the New York Times are going to just shut the hell up and focus on the hockey. So screw it, I’m avoiding it all as much as I can.
by Resolute on May 1, 2009 1:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
<YAWN> This was old years ago. I mean, good for Crosby and Ovechkin and all, but seriously, can anyone even name the both goalies for both teams? Or who has the better defense? Or what the inury list looks like? Anyone who’s not either a Pittsburgh or Washington fan, I mean.
Cassie
"And will that be cash, hip check, or Raw Charge today?"
by Cassie McClellan on May 1, 2009 2:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I realize I qualify as the former, but still, I think the Pens goalie is rather well known, Fleury. And it’s hard not to know the Caps situation after they sat Theodore and went with Varlamov.
I think the better question is if any MSM article about the series will focus on something other than Sid v. Ovie, and we all know the answer is no. It’s the same reason we get Sox/Yankees shoved down our throats in baseball, college football in the states loves to point out that Joe Paterno is old, the NFL will give us a lot of Peyton and Tom Brady and the NBA will play up a Kobe/Lebron final (assuming it leads to that). It’s an easy story idea, and it’s nearly guaranteed that casual fans will read it.
Penn Staters belong at Penn State. The problem with a lot of kids is they just don’t know they are Penn Staters yet. -jesse. @ BSD
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on May 1, 2009 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The worst part, in my view, is that there really isn’t much of a rivalry. They’re both asked about it ad nauseum, though.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 1, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This seems like a pretty naive and elitist way of jabbing at this article.
The truth is that there are probably a dozen posts on SB Nation alone analyzing each of the factors you’ve mentioned above. There’s probably 6 looking at the “rivalry” in a good light and probably 100 posts complaining about the coverage like you just did.
Even a casual hockey fan knows about the rivalry at this point and anyone who cared to know about the defenses or injuries would know where to look to find that information out. As a matter of fact I think James posted an article a couple of days ago on the matter.
But you probably already knew this and fell asleep reading this response because you’re that much better than me.
by snowburnt on May 1, 2009 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t intend to make a jab at the post, simply at the constant discussion of these two particular players at the expense of both teams.
Cassie
"And will that be cash, hip check, or Raw Charge today?"
by Cassie McClellan on May 1, 2009 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really? I live in DC, you’d think we’d be inundated with it as much as anybody. Lately the only articles I’ve seen about the “rivalry” is articles like this discussion the fact that there isn’t one, and that was about a week ago. The articles lately have been mainly about the team, the teams’ rivalry over the years, the one today is about Mike Green. I’ve seen more articles about the team match ups than this “constant discussion”. The only people still writing about it are people that don’t normally cover hockey. Not much to be gained by reading their articles.
no one serious about getting hockey news would get it from ESPN anyway. They posted news gleaned from a crank call that Mike Green was going to be suspended. Quality journalism, that.
by snowburnt on May 1, 2009 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only people still writing about it are people that don’t normally cover hockey. Not much to be gained by reading their articles.
But those are exactly the articles on ESPN that the elusive “casual fan” would be reading. The most unfortunate thing about going after the casual fan is that the avid fan can’t be avoided, and he or she will be sick to death of the rivalry story within a bananosecond. On the other hand, I wonder if it’s possible to catch the casual fan at all in today’s fragmented media environment. I know that even though I am a sports fan, I don’t even bother watching ESPN and I don’t go to their site because they don’t meet my needs. I’m interested in hockey and baseball, and I know which locations to go to for the information I want on those sports. By avoiding ESPN, I not only avoid their herd of yelling heads, but I don’t get news about basketball or football, which they cover ad nauseum and in which I have no interest. I wonder if someone who already doesn’t care for hockey will just avoid it because they don’t want to waste their time, and never even get Crosby stories no matter how much the league tries to push him as the face of the entire NHL.
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on May 1, 2009 11:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I live in northern Virginia myself, and avoid ESPN whenever possible on TV as well as online, and I’ve still be inundated with Crosby vs. Ovechkin. NHL.com is one of the worst offenders, in fact, and obviously they cover hockey. TSN has also been all over it – which makes sense since they’re partly owned by ESPN. It’s a manufactured story that the major hockey websites can’t get over because they want it to be true. And not only is it non-news, but it’s old non-news.
Don’t get me wrong, I happen to like Ovechkin – tho I think that Crosby, while a very good player, is overhyped – so it has nothing to do with the players themselves. It’s all about the coverage. If they’d wanted to get closer to the truth, it should be Semin vs Crosby and Malkin vs Ovechkin. But that’s too complicated, I guess.
Cassie
"And will that be cash, hip check, or Raw Charge today?"
by Cassie McClellan on May 2, 2009 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the problem there is that Semin doesn’t talk to the North American media, Malkin didn’t get much coverage until he put up huge numbers AND learned some English. Little Sasha Syoma still has a lot to learn before he’ll be a brand name, plus “Semin” is a little too close to a special English word that doesn’t mean “Son of Semyon”.
by snowburnt on May 4, 2009 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see why Ovechkin-Crosby “rivalry” is the main news for ESPN and others but it’s getting pretty old. Unless they put up a cage fight… There’re lot of other good/great players in both teams and it would be nice if they were getting some attention. And since those are the ones left with less media attention there would probably be something new too.
Как хотел я
by sleza on May 1, 2009 4:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Crosby v. Ovechkin
I don’t think fans really care about this. Blog fans care, and media fans care, and both can list stats to the nth degree why one player is better than the other, and they all can come up with playground names for players. Pretty comical really.
by oldnumberseven on May 1, 2009 5:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I am definitely getting sick of Crosby VS Ovechkin
It’s getting to be to much. I can understand hyping these two up the most obviously, but it gets to a point where its just repetitive. I am still very excited for this series, but there are so many great talents on both teams (Green, Malkin, Backstrom, Semin, Kunitz, Fleury ETC) that are just getting ignored. I hope this series can go six or seven, should be interesting!
by adamgreuel on May 2, 2009 2:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 

















