Ranking the Round 2 teams: Age and size
I'm a bit late on this analysis, but all the Balsillie business took up a lot of the blog coverage last week.
So, here it is: The Final Eight ranked by age, height and weight.
| Age | Rk | Height | Rk | Weight | Rk | |||
| ANA | 28.3 | 6 | 73.7 | 3 | 204.2 | 3 | ||
| BOS | 29.0 | 3 | 73.2 | 6 | 199.7 | 6 | ||
| CAR | 29.4 | 2 | 72.4 | 7 | 199.0 | 7 | ||
| CHI | 25.6 | 8 | 73.3 | 5 | 203.4 | 4 | ||
| DET | 30.5 | 1 | 72.2 | 8 | 197.7 | 8 | ||
| PIT | 29.0 | 4 | 73.3 | 4 | 203.0 | 5 | ||
| VAN | 28.6 | 5 | 73.8 | 2 | 205.5 | 2 | ||
| WSH | 28.3 | 7 | 74.3 | 1 | 206.7 | 1 |
I've posted this enough times to know the questions that are coming, so, if the Red Wings didn't include Mr. Chelios, their average age would be 29.7 — so they're still old. And if Chara wasn't included in the Bruins height calculation, they'd be 72.9 inches on average, which is a hair under 6-foot-1 and fairly short by NHL standards.
Other than Detroit, which simultaneously always has the oldest and smallest team, the Capitals are at another extreme with the second youngest — next to Chicago — and biggest club. (That'd be an interesting finals matchup, no?)
Carolina's the East's version of the Red Wings (old and small), while the Canucks were the biggest Western Conference club in the mix.
Food for thought.
0 recs |
8 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
What does Pittsburgh have Crosby listed as again?
6’5’’?
by YZZR on May 12, 2009 5:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I believe they’re actually the biggest team in the league, not just of the remaining ones. San Jose was second.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 12, 2009 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So….What would the Bruins be without Chara’s weight?
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure!
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 12, 2009 9:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you take Brindy and Whitney out of the picture in Carolina, they go from an average age of 29.4 years to an incredible 25.8. And that’s with a 35 year old Walker still in the lineup.
Detroit is bound to hit a wall at some point here in the next couple of years. At what point do you say “enough is enough” for players like Chelios, Maltby, Draper, Lidstrom and Osgood and bring in some younger talent, especially between the pipes?
Would it be safe to say that 2 years from now, Detroit shuffles back a few spots in the West and teams like Chicago and (dare I say) St. Louis use their explosive young talent to bump themselves up in the standings?
-Schrembs
saucerpass.com
@saucerpass
by Saucerpass on May 12, 2009 9:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Chicago’s got some serious issues against the cap coming up.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 12, 2009 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, I don’t think that’s a reality for Detroit.
Chelios plays in too few games to really be considered a factor. While both Draper and Maltby will be sorely missed by the organization—realize there are a handful of players in their system who would be playing 3rd or 4th line with any other team already. Leino, Abdelkader and Helm have all proved capable of replacing them.
I find it interesting, for as many detractors as Osgood has, many of those same people think Osgood is some integral part of the organization. The Red Wings rely on a tandem system in net—something we now see more frequently in the NHL. As was pointed out by someone on this blog before, the difference between a $2 million netminder and a $6 million netminder really is not that drastic. I imagine both he and Conklin will be around for a few years more to give Daniel Larsson some more time to develop. It’s become obvious that their faith Jimmy Howard is minimal.
They’ll take that money and dump it into their defense. Pending the loss of Lidstrom, that is their most pressing issue. You can see now with Rafalski out that they are testing the water with Ericsson and I wouldn’t be surprised to see him full-time next season.
Even still, it’s a large gap to fill, but the Red Wings will get sizable cap relief with his retirement. Depending on what they do with Hossa, it would be enough to go and find another top-two defenseman.
by hallock on May 12, 2009 9:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know, I think Kronwall can step into a top pairing spot on the blueline. He quietly had a great year.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 12, 2009 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















