Quenneville blows his top
All in all, a brutal game for the Blackhawks. So much for this being a long series... so much for the idea that we wouldn't see a rematch of last year's final come June 5.
At least Chicago coach Joel Quenneville tried to make the festivities interesting in his postgame comments after the Red Wings shellacked his team 6-1.
"Well, I think we witnessed probably the worst call in the history of sports today at the end of the second period there, nothing play," he said to open his press conference, speaking in reference to a roughing call on Matt Walker to end the first period. "You know, they score, it's 3-0, they ruin a good hockey game. They absolutely destroyed what was going on on the ice."
He was then asked about players taking a run at Patrick Kane and if the penalty came in retaliation for that.
"I couldn't find the penalties," Quenneville said. "I think you could argue along the way. But they ruined the whole game. I think that's basically the gist of what I'm trying to say."
And here comes the fine...
There's clearly some frustration at play there for the 'Hawks coach, and that's understandable, but this game (and this series, frankly) hardly turned on a few botched penalty calls. Yes, the Red Wings had nine power plays to Chicago's four, but many came after the game was out of hand.
I'm not sure there's any good news out of all this for the Blackhawks, other than the fact they've got nowhere to go but up. The bad news is they're headed to Detroit for Game 5 on Wednesday and that they were pummelled by a Red Wings team missing both Lidstrom and Datsyuk.
Then again, Chicago's surprised a few times in these playoffs, so who knows? Taking things back to Game 6 at the United Center would sure do a lot to help rescue a third round that's quickly lost a lot of its intrigue.
Finally, here's Mike Babcock and Henrik Zetterberg on the Blackhawks' undisciplined play, which just so happened to be the topic of conversation after the game.
"We just felt that we wanted to play the game as physical as we can between the whistles, not do a whole lot of talking after the whistles. And, you know, when you're hyped up, you're excited, sometimes you cross the line. That's what unfortunately happened for them tonight."
"I don't know what they were thinking," Zetterberg said. "You know, that was the way they were playing. You know, we just pay attention to ourselves, try to stick with it, play the way we want to, don't care about so much what they're doing."
0 recs |
20 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Game 2 was brutally called from a Blackhawks perspective as well, and it easily could’ve resulted in the Wings’ OT win, which would’ve greatly changed the look of this series. But then the Hawks got the calls to start Game 3. This game was just brutal, the Hawks didn’t have any jump early for some reason. They had the better lineup on the ice tonight, and they didn’t take advantage and pressure the Red Wings’ depleted D. They shouldn’t have needed the help of the officials.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on May 24, 2009 11:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Chicago totally shot themselves in the foot. Quenneville must have been watching a different game than me. They spent the whole game venting their frustrations over the Kronwall hit last game – not a recipe for a successful stanley cup run. Experience definitely won out in today’s game.
by detroitnick on May 24, 2009 11:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
btw
“worst call in the history of sports” LOL
by detroitnick on May 24, 2009 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When Quennenvill decides to engage in hyperbole he doesn’t mess around, does he?
Worst call in recent memory (NHL at least) was probably Brett Hull’s 1999 G6 3OT goal with the skate in the crease. Second being the Gelinas no-goal call in 2004 G6.
by R O on May 25, 2009 12:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Wayne Gretzky high stick no call was the worst call in sports history. Quenneville needs a history lesson.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 25, 2009 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
First time I heard about it. Googled it – yeah horrible call.
by R O on May 25, 2009 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’d be the worst “no call,” wouldn’t it?
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 25, 2009 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Worst Non-Call. So the worst call category is still open. It sure as hell didn’t come on Sunday.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 25, 2009 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably should have been coincidental minors out of the scrum, but Chicago was already down 2-0 and if they had killed the penalty off they would have had to stay disciplined in order to come back anyway. Once they got frustrated, they played like the young and inexperienced team that they are.
If I try I might be able to think of some worse calls in the history of sports – a few baseball plays come to mind, for sure.
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on May 25, 2009 4:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Worse calls than Walker’s roughing (but definitely not the worst in history) were the 5 minute + gamer on Kronwall for the legal Havlat hit, and the non-call on Byfuglien who boarded Kronwall afterward.
Calls like Walker’s happen all the time. Quenneville’s comments are very desperate, and funny.
by Bob1958 on May 25, 2009 8:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
J.Q.
Q needs to put all his drama behind him. The Hawks still have a game to play in a few days.
by Bird6 on May 25, 2009 9:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Q is as mad that the team or player didn’t appaear to be informed that they HAD been penalized for that activity until they came back to start the 2nd. If they had known about it, they might have prepared a bit better for it coming out of the intermission.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on May 25, 2009 10:03 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Would they have had any more opportunity to be prepared had the penalty occurred in the middle of a period?
by alexcutter on May 25, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, usually a penalized player is told he’s been penalized when the infraction happens.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on May 25, 2009 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
saskhab – Duncan Keith indicated in the post game interviews that they were aware of the penalty, he said that is why he was on the ice to start the 2nd period.
by mc keeper on May 25, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I haven’t heard anyone from the Hawks claim that they weren’t aware.
And what difference would it have made it they weren’t informed until the start of the 2nd period?
That’s more than enough time to make adjustments.
by alexcutter on May 25, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They could have called up an entire AHL roster to start the second period and been better prepared.
by J. Michael Neal on May 25, 2009 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heck, to start the first it would’ve been better. They really showed their youth last night by failing to take initiative, or else mentally thinking it’d be easy with no Lidstrom in the lineup.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on May 25, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As for Quennville’s comments after the game, big deal. He doesn’t believe it was the worst call in this series, let alone the history of sports. He’s a veteran coach with a young team that just got done with an embarrassing loss of discipline at a critical moment. He wants the press to leave his team alone while they try to get it back together for Wednesday’s game. So he says the most ridiculous thing he can come up with, in the hopes that the media will spend its time bothering him instead of the players.
Sparky Anderson used to do this constantly when he was managing the Tigers (and presumably the Reds as well). Granted, ol’ George also liked to be the center of attention more than I think Joel Quennville does, but it’s deliberate outrageousness.
by J. Michael Neal on May 25, 2009 3:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















