Goals per game by league

As a quick follow up to my post from last night on European goaltenders, what follows is a quick and dirty look at goal-scoring rates in eight top professional leagues. As a rule of thumb, the NHL averaged 5.70 goals per game this season, up from about 5.45 last year, and those figures don't include shootout goals.
The goals per game numbers below are lifted straight off of the standings in the respective leagues, and I believe they do include shootout goals:
| Leagues | GP | G | GPG | |
| 1 | Swiss Nat. A | 300 | 1945 | 6.48 |
| 2 | ECHL | 764 | 4818 | 6.31 |
| 3 | Austrian League | 270 | 1672 | 6.19 |
| 4 | DEL (Germany) | 416 | 2527 | 6.07 |
| 5 | AHL | 1160 | 6634 | 5.72 |
| 6 | KHL (Russia) | 672 | 3682 | 5.48 |
| 7 | Elitserien (Sweden) | 330 | 1782 | 5.40 |
| 8 | SM-liiga (Finland) | 406 | 2120 | 5.22 |
Totals are based on this past season only, and do not include postseason figures.
0 recs |
13 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Why not put the NHL in the table?
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure!
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 4, 2009 1:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, thank you!
I didn’t know if you had already started digging for it, so I did my own.
-All figures are from HockeyDB.com.
-For any pro leagues (NA or Euro), the numbers are from the last 4 years combined (post-lockout, I did not include Euro 04-05 numbers because of the large number of NA players due to the lockout)
-For any amateur leagues (NCAA, CIS, and all Junior), I included 04-05 for a 5th year of data.
Here we go. G/Game is multiplied by 2 for the overall scoring environment.
League GP G G/Game
NHL 9839 28846 5.86
AHL 8960 26463 5.91
ECHL 6932 22030 6.36
CHL 4160 13614 6.55
NCAA 11021 31752 5.76
CIS 2616 8893 6.80
QMJHL 6124 21552 7.04
WHL 7560 22651 5.99
OHL 6800 23365 6.87
KHL 1344 3682 5.48
DEL 3128 9654 6.17
Elitserien 2580 6973 5.41
CzechExtra 2184 5979 5.48
Nat A 2254 7014 6.22
SM-liiga 784 2041 5.21
Shut up when you're talking to me!
by Afino on May 4, 2009 1:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I swear that looked better when I originally pasted it.
Very similar findings. I included the Czech Extraliga, and missed the Austrian league.
Shut up when you're talking to me!
by Afino on May 4, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which CHL is that? Central or Canadian?
2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity
by Mike @ MHH on May 5, 2009 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Central. My bad for not making that clear.
Shut up when you're talking to me!
by Afino on May 5, 2009 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really, lookin from my perspective, this just strengthens my opinions: Swiss goaltenders rock. Really, Gerber, Hiller et al are in a QMJHL situation: they play in a difficult situation and have to be very good to thrive. As ridiculous as it sounds, the only elite league that you can watch in Finland without buying expensive TV packages is the Swiss league, so I’ve watched a lot of that. But frankly, the top goalies there right now are in their mid-30’s, so the real prospects here (I’ve watched KHL quite a bit and a couple of games of Finnish and Swedish leagues) are 1) Markstrom 2) Koskinen 3) Gustafsson (he’s the most NHL ready of the bunch, though, but I’ll be darned if he’s a starter. I was wrong about Finn Niklas Backstrom, though, so take my ideas with a grain of salt ;) ) and 4) Salak. And as ridiculous as it is with these guys (everyone is so young) I have no doubt in my mind that Salak pretty much could be the next Hasek. Really. He’s awesome, but he doesn’t have either the physical side or the successfull experience of the others, so I give no. 4 to him. He probably has the highest upside: I see Markstrom as a surefire borderline starter, but not much more, Koskinen as a probable good starter but maybe not that, Gustafsson as an almost sure borderline starter which he could be right now and Salak as a probable career backup / minor-leaguer who very well could be the second coming of whoever you think is the best goalie ever ;)
Yeah, I’m taking a relaxed opinion here, but what can you say, you never know about goalies. I wanted to make this comment on the post about Euro goalies but this is newer so here we go.
by Malurous on May 4, 2009 4:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No surprise on the ECHL’s position, given the relative youth and lack of pro experience of the goaltenders, generally speaking.
They do put on a good show, though.
by Whale4ever on May 4, 2009 5:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Inspired by your post on goalies earlier, I wanted to look at how many shots each goalie in the KHL was facing (discussion spawned between a friend and myself) and here’s the spreadsheet I got. It’s sorted by traditional GAA and there are the league averages on the bottom of the table. All “adjusted” numbers are using the league average shot-per-game rate imposed on the goalies core numbers — don’t know if that’s the best way to do it, but it seemed to get me where I wanted to go.
Anyone know anything about Sergey Gayduchenko or Vasily Koshechkin?
Also, James, Hockey Reference has the total goals per game being 5.83 in 2008-09 — is that because it counts shootout goals?
by Mike Rogers on May 4, 2009 6:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup. By my count, there 123 OT goals (exactly 1 of every 10 games ended in OT this year) and 159 shootouts. That’s 5.6 G/game in regulation, 5.7 in regulation+OT, and 5.83 when you take a very confusing definition of ‘goal’ and count shootout winners.
The most meaningful way to measure G/game is to exclude any non-regulation results. But I don’t know how other leagues do OT or how many OT goals they had. And frankly, it probably doesn’t change the order, anyway.
by RyanV on May 4, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Empty Maybe
Has anyone figured a system that does NOT feature shootout goals? This treatise, as presented, is meaningless if it includes such.
by EmptyMaybe on May 4, 2009 10:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m afraid all we can do is go with the goals figures provided by each league. I don’t even know which ones include shootouts in their grand totals (a practice the NHL has taken to doing for some reason).
Shootout tallies, as Ryan illustrates, would not affect the results enough to make them meaningless, however. This gives you a very accurate idea of how high or low scoring the leagues are.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 5, 2009 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for clearing that up, James.
by EmptyMaybe on May 6, 2009 7:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Proposal?
Mirtle, you could dig PP goals, I have a feeling that PP time has increased a lot. Refs line is at least seemingly tighter I’m not sure if that’s a good thing I mean nice to have goals of course but constant PP/PKs just takes something away from the game. Nowadays real fear could be that team that doesn’t deserve to win, wins because of weak calls. imo, but you could comment that too.
Plus if ruling is tighter will it raise pests and divers into every teams most wanted list?
Even during these playoffs there has been very questionable calls.(imo stuff again)
Thoughts?
by nudge on May 5, 2009 4:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















