Ovechkin's incredible release
I'm sure I'm not the only one who's seen Alex Ovechkin shirtless in the dressing room – and there are plenty of pictures out there for the curious. Unlike some of hockey's all-time great snipers, he's not built with Popeye-thick forearms and a barrel chest.
And yet he sure shoots like it.
Ovechkin was the difference in Game 2 for the Capitals, but more to the point, Ovechkin's shot was the difference. He scored three terrific goals – two perfect one-timer blasts and one seeing-eye wrister up high – on shots that only a small fraction of the best players in the world have a hope of making.
It reminds me a bit of when Tiger Woods first came on the scene in his sport, and at a fraction of his current size was belting the ball further down the fairway than players who had 40 pounds on him. Ovechkin's not blasting the puck using brute force – it's technique, like the perfect golf swing, and it's beautiful to watch him pick the corners at full speed.
It's genius at work.
Generally when you talk about the great shooters in hockey's history, you think of players like the Hulls – Bobby and his son Brett – but they didn't hit, skate and create space nearly as much as Ovechkin does. He's an anomaly – a freak of nature, essentially – and at 23 and in only his fourth NHL campaign may already lay claim to the title of the sport's most lethal shooter.
If he plays like that, I don't know that the Penguins have the personnel to shut him down. (And it's hard not to think ahead to what a potential Ovechkin-Chara matchup in Round 3 might look like.)
Ovechkin certainly seems to be having fun.
"Sick game," he said at the postgame presser. "Sick three goals by me and him. If I was Capitals fans, I would be very happy right now.
"The atmosphere right now its unbelievable in town. You can see all the red. I'm probably afraid to go home right now."
Ovechkin has 21 of his team's 59 shots on goal in this series — 36 per cent — which is up from the 19 per cent he averaged during the season. He had 12 in this game alone, and the Penguins didn't do nearly enough in terms of limiting his opportunities. Ovechkin played seven and a half minutes on the power play, so he'll get his chances there, but eight of his shots were at even strength and two of those beat Marc-Andre Fleury.
A few more thoughts:
- All of this crowing about Ovechkin's hat trick isn't to take anything away from what Crosby did in this game. He was terrific, too, albeit in a more understated fashion, and confounded the Caps defence down in the crease area. They either need Mike Green to get more physical on him in front of the net or give the matchup to someone else because Crosby's own genius was at work on his three goals from in close. "Sidney was outstanding — it's incredible how good he is around the net," Green said. "He was carrying his team, but tonight — we had the top gun tonight."
- Crosby's probably never going to hear the end of the fact he complained about hats on the ice. At a game with two hat tricks. (I love the kid's competitiveness, but sometimes it doesn't manifest itself in as compelling a way as Ovechkin's.)
- Pittsburgh is getting slaughtered in the faceoff circle, mainly by Sergei Fedorov and David Steckel. The Pens won just eight of 23 defensive zone draws (35%), and Evgeni Malkin essentially wasn't taking any key faceoffs given his ineptitude at the dot. Washington's as dangerous a puck possession team as there is in the league, and they're getting it the vast majority of the time right off the bat.
- Speaking of Malkin, most pundits are being rather kind in their criticism so far, but he was pathetic in this game – hurting his team more than helping in several key instances. He and Ovechkin may have finished 1-2 in the scoring race (and likely the Hart voting) but there's no comparison so far in this series. And it'll be a short one if Malkin doesn't show up soon.
- The bottom line is that the Penguins have some solid options on the back end defensively that should be able to handle the task of limiting Ovechkin's chances, and they've simply fallen short. Neither team could shutdown the two marquee stars in this one, and that's obviously going to be the series key going forward. And when Pens coach Dan Bylsma says "the good news is it should be pretty clear what we need to get better at and what we need to focus on" he could have just drawn a giant '8' on the blackboard. Stopping AO is their game plan for Wednesday.
- Chris Kunitz had an ugly crosscheck to the head of Simeon Varlamov prior to Crosby's final goal that will get a look from the NHL's disciplinarians (and plenty of play from the pundits). Varlamov was terrific again.
It really doesn't look good for Pittsburgh, especially if Kris Letang is going to miss significant time with whatever hand/arm injury he suffered in this one. Even with him in the lineup, I'm not sure any team can beat one led by Ovechkin playing like this in four of the next five games.
I suppose we'll see.
1 recs |
54 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Caps might have lost Semin too…This game goes to 7 games it might as well be the AHL playoff series going on currently with all the call ups that will have to happen on both sides
by snowburnt on May 5, 2009 7:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
There’s nothing wrong with Alex Semin…the forward who’s injured is Eric Fehr.
by Forsch31 on May 5, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Semin went off the ice favoring his hand in the last two minutes after an Orpik hit.
Fehr might require a call up also…Course Bruce only give him about 6 minutes a game anyway for some reason.
by snowburnt on May 5, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Post’s Capitals Insider is reporting that Eric Fehr and John Erskine are the ones with injuries. Semin, other than he and other players (Varlamov, Ovechkin, and Poti among them) weren’t skating in the optional, but that’s par for the course.
by Forsch31 on May 5, 2009 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As a pens fan, I agree, Crosby can’t complain about the hats (although it was pretty amazing just how many there were). Still, can’t let that overshadow the fact that despite the Pens being down 0-2 this series is living up to the hype that all the bigwigs dreamed for. How many times have you seen a game where two of the best players in the world each got a hat trick? It may not be as pretty as Ovechkin’s shot from the point, but if Crosby keeps it up he should just make his living in front of the net. Its obviously where he is most effective.
by jnh143 on May 5, 2009 7:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
1) Impressed with Crosby willing to get ‘dirty goals’. If a few of his team mates showed the same tenacity this would be a 2-0 series for Pitt right now!
2) So far the kid goalie is looking like the real deal. Geez his lateral movements are insanly quick!
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else
by Fauxrumors on May 5, 2009 8:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Crosby’s tip out of midair on his final goal was amazing.
I still think the Pens need another scoring winger. They could have had a couple more if they would have had a really good sniper in there.
stop by Waving the Wheat (http://wavingthewheat.wordpress.com/) and The College Hockey Blog (http://thecollegehockeyblog.wordpress.com/)
by fetch9 on May 5, 2009 10:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I still wonder what this team would look like had they drafted Jonathan Toews instead of Jordan Staal there years ago. Talk about a great player to play with Crosby.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 5, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How many games
for Kunitz? What a pathetic display. He is officially a douchebag.
A Toronto sports blog, where we unequivocally and unapologetically support the home team, and Mats Sundin, the GREATEST TORONTO MAPLE LEAF EVER...
PLAYOFFS!!!!1
by eyebleaf on May 5, 2009 10:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m guessing zero since Varlamov wasn’t hurt
by snowburnt on May 5, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very true. I didn’t like him when he was at Ferris State, either. Great talent, unacceptable behavior. He was a good fit on the Ducks.
by J. Michael Neal on May 5, 2009 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
James, where is the Penguins in 5 choice in the poll? ;-)
by CP2Devil on May 5, 2009 10:35 AM CDT reply actions 2 recs
You might have to double check your phrasing there…
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 5, 2009 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe. I’m just bustin’ balls and I’m pretty sure you got the point.
by Fehr and Balanced on May 5, 2009 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good-natured ribbing I can take.
Can never tell if people are being assholes in the comments or not…
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 5, 2009 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the downfall of the internet. It’s all good natured.
by Fehr and Balanced on May 6, 2009 1:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you’ve obviously never seen the comments at Puckdaddy’s page.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on May 6, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha. I’ve seen them, and thus avoid them. I meant it’s all good natured by me. Sarcasm, dry humor, and ball busting tend to not translate very well on a computer screen. I was just assuring Mirtle I’m not a dick.
by Fehr and Balanced on May 6, 2009 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Har har.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 5, 2009 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m surprised there hasn’t been more of an uproar about Semin’s interference/trip on Matt Cooke that led to Ovechkin’s second goal. It was pretty blatant and directly led to a score. Now I’m not saying that the Penguins lost because of it, but penalties don’t come much clearer.
by RCheli on May 5, 2009 10:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Cooke got sucked in, then held in, it was a missed call but not as bad as Orpiks spear that somehow got semin 2 minor penalties or the cross check to the head of Varly, both of which lead to penguins goals.
So yeah, missed calls both ways leading to goals. It happens.
by snowburnt on May 5, 2009 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curious -- no interference on Cooke = no laser from O. How does Orpiks stickwork = goal?
by Bob Roberts on May 5, 2009 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it lead to a 5-3 that was scored on…Granted far less causal than the interference on cooke or the cross-check on Varlamov, but a spear is a serious penalty, an attempted spear is 5 minutes.
by snowburnt on May 5, 2009 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
to be honest, the bad calls have been spread out pretty evenly, so there is no reason to complain. Then there is the fact that watching these two go at it kinda makes you forget about the refs and just enjoy the game.
by PensFan024 on May 5, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cooke has no complaint. He got into a puck battle with Semin by charging into the face off circle. The contact was incidental and had no bearing on the outcome of that play. If Cooke wanted to take away the passing lane from Green to AO he would have had to skate out to that line right off the face off, but he didn’t. He was out of position as soon as he engaged Semin when the puck dropped. No penalty.
by Fehr and Balanced on May 5, 2009 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A few more thoughts
The cross check was filthy, this is why as HHOF’er Billy Smith says, he would bankrupt his franchise with player fines.
Not much mention of Washington’s kill of a Pens’ 5 on 3.
Erskine was missed in the Caps’ crease area.
by cubanpuckstopper on May 5, 2009 10:48 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on Erskine. He’s been Varlamov’s big brother in the playoffs, and I doubt if the first goal would have happened if that was Erskine on Crosby rather than Green.
by Forsch31 on May 5, 2009 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
troll alert!
2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity
by Mike @ MHH on May 5, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh, he’s a Flames fan. And that’s just the way he rolls.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 5, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Proud supporter of the least worst NHL franchise in Alberta.
by R O on May 5, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Green also has a bum shoulder. I’d bet you hear he is having surgery a week after the Caps season ends.
by Fehr and Balanced on May 5, 2009 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ovechkin's wrister
Indeed, what a thing of beauty.
When Ovechkin can bring all the one-on-one/power moves we’ve seen him do and he can alternatively decide to just pull up inside the blueline and fire off a shot around the defenseman, upper corner, away from his body and in one fluid motion like that — heh, well what can you do? Expect your goalie to stop it, I guess, but that’s easier said than done when you’re talking about Ovechkin’s speed and shot velocity.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
by Dominik on May 5, 2009 10:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They’re such deceiving shots, too, and he used Gonchar so well as a screen. Incredible.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 5, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I believe the puck was on edge, right? How can you shoot a puck on edge that hard with that kind of accuracy? It’s just amazing.
by Fehr and Balanced on May 5, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I imagine a few hundred NHLers are wondering the same thing. That guy is a beast.
by GOOLIAN on May 5, 2009 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
.
Why hasnt some coach thought outside the conventional wisdom box and assigned a man to play Ovechkin tighter. You know, a shadow? I know the conventional wisdom is that its better to have a specific defensive pair against a star, but clearly, Ovechkin doesnt need a lot of space to make something happen. The less he has the puck the better, and the sooner a man can get on him when he has the puck, the better.
Especially on the PP – you know exactly what hes going to do – he’s going to take as many shots from the right point as he can. Put a forward on him, and take as much of his time away as possible. On the 3rd caps goal (the Ovechkin PP goal 4 seconds in)…Why isn’t there a Pens player lined up to shadow Ovechkin off the draw? Matt Cooke is left alone to play both Semin and Ovechkin off the draw, and he gets tied up with Semin – not something that is unexpected on a faceoff. Why not take the man off the boards, and have two men on the inside – one to battle Semin, and the other to jump out on Ovechkin.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on May 5, 2009 11:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Because if you assign a man to shadow Ovechkin on a powerplay, then you leave somebody else wide open (you’re already a man down). When that somebody is Mike Green or Alexander Semin (with Brooks Laich down low), that’s gonna be a short-lived penalty kill
by Forsch31 on May 5, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
good point...
youre probably right…i doubt that 4-3 penalty kill could survive longer than the 4 seconds the 5-4 PK did.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on May 5, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plenty of teams have tried to do just that. It has been somewhat successful IMO. However, you have to have a guy with size and speed to handle him and I don’t know that the Pens have a guy like that.. I expect Pens to go back to trying to put Gill on him like Therrien did with a small measure of success. Doing so on the PP is a huge mistake! He’s a good passer when he wants/needs to be. Caps have enough guys who can finish that I’m sure Caps wouldn’t lose any sleep over such a tactic. That would just leave more goals for Semin, Feds, Flash, or Green (when healthy and I’m convinced he’s not right now).
Focusing on Ovi always eventually will come back to haunt. Boudreau will make adjustments and if it opens up the ice for others he can put Semin up on Ovi’s line and then he’ll just score instead. Semin is due for a great game as are Laich and Backstrom. Caps have played average games the first 2 games of this series. Same goes for the Pens. As good as last night’s game was both these teams can ramp it up a notch or two higher.
by CP2Devil on May 5, 2009 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would just leave more goals for Semin, Feds, Flash, or Green (when healthy and I’m convinced he’s not right now). Focusing on Ovi always eventually will come back to haunt.
So we’ve got an unhealthy Green…we’ve got a 91-year-old former superstar…and we’ve got a Semin who might have a minor hand injury? I’ll take my chance with them and do my best to make sure their superstar is neutralized. Right now, the person killing them is Ovechkin. Not Green, not Semin, not Laich. I’d rather take my chances with Fleury stopping those guys, then throw my hands up and say “well, Ovechkin’s too good!”
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on May 5, 2009 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ovechkin’s pretty fast and shifty, there’s no guarantee your shadow for him wouldn’t get left behind.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
by Chemmy on May 5, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Point taken. The health issues are an issue. However, as I noted before, such a move typically opens up ice for other guys. I’m confident that other Caps would step up and do there part to add scoring punch. They have all year long.
I’d be careful about discounting Feds. Starting midway through the series with the Rangers he started looking real comfortable again. I’m guessing its a combo of his groin finally feeling better and having the same linemates for more than a game or two in a row. Many of us Caps fans thought he’d lost a step, but maybe his groin thing was worse than we thought. He sure looks like good ol Feds flying through the neutral zone forcing much younger D-men to backpeddle. His shot isn’t what it once was but it ain’t slop either.
by CP2Devil on May 5, 2009 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fedorov’s been a beast at the faceoff dot, too. He’s been pretty impressive in general.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 5, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If this is going to be Sergei’s last season, he seems to want to go out on a high note. Good for him.
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on May 5, 2009 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shadowing AO assumes you can stop him with one guy, but you can’t. When he is stopped it is because the D on his side, and the center are both paying attention to him, and sometimes the wing on that side pinches to help too. There is nobody on the PIT roster that can skate with AO and play with his physicality except for Malkin, and that would probably be a waste of his talent (although considering his performance so far they may want to consider it). Stopping AO is a team effort, not something a single specialist can do.
by Fehr and Balanced on May 5, 2009 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the team concept
doesn’t seem to be working so well right now, does it? He’s getting 49280498230484 shot attempts a game. Put a Staal or Cooke on there against him and see what happens. You don’t need to only have someone who can skate with him – you need someone who has hockey smarts and can read plays. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t but we’ve seen a ton of superstars over the years get off their game when they’ve got a guy out there who’s sole job is to tick him off.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on May 5, 2009 7:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Rags had success by bringing EVERYONE back to the slot and not giving up any shooting lanes. When AO had the puck coming into the zone both D focused on him (unless one D was pulled away by a guy driving the net, i.e. never) and the center was always high and ready to backcheck AO. Just because the Pens aren’t doing it right doesn’t mean it’s not the way to go. If the Pens want Cooke to get 14 PIM a game they can try that, but Cooke isn’t fast enough or strong enough to control AO and would just end up taking stupid PIM. As for Staal, he would be a good choice but I’m still not sure he can skate with AO. Also, Staal hasn’t looked that great in his own end this series. He’s made a couple bad mental errors that helped lead to pucks behind MAF.
by Fehr and Balanced on May 5, 2009 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ovie's 2nd Goal
As he furiously skated backwards to get into position for that one-timer I had the feeling you get in a big NBA game when a legendary player or great jump shooter (jordan, bird, reggie miller) gets set up for a wide-open 3 in a big spot. You know it’s going in; you’d bet your house it’s going in. Just awesome.
by chrtat on May 5, 2009 2:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking exactly the same thing about an open three-pointers. The great players make them; Ovie makes the wide-open one-timers in his sleep.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on May 5, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting that you use a golf analogy
Sometimes he reminds me of a PGA tour member putting. Ovechkin is the best player I’ve ever seen coming in one on one with a d-man and being able to snap a shot through him. It goes wide a lot, sometimes it hits the goalie, sometimes the goalie reacts quick enough to make a save, but his ability to get it through the traffic is uncanny.
It’s like a golfer standing over a putt and aiming for a spot on the green 2 feet away when the hole is 30 feet away. It seems like his primary goal is not to pick a corner or whatever, but to place the puck in the proper spot 2 feet away from him to get it by the d-man. As evidence by his SOG totals, it works very well and adds countless goal totals to his numbers over the course of a season.
by Make a play Whitner on May 5, 2009 2:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
dead on...
have we ever seen a player get as many shots attempted as Ovechkin does? Id love to see that stat over the course of a season. Add that to the ability to get shots on net, and its amazing.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on May 5, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















