Rangers raise fans' ire with price hike
The Rangers just sent out their season's ticket renewal prices this afternoon, and I've already been hearing from angry fans about prices going up to the tune of between 4 and 9 per cent given the economy and the way the team played this season.
"I don’t think I’m renewing next year," ticket holder Nik Latorre said. "The product they iced this year doesn’t justify such a significant raise in price. I can’t see how they have the second worst offensive production in the league and have the marbles to RAISE prices when so many teams are lowering or freezing."
By my count, the Rangers' price hike will be the second- or third-highest out of any NHL team this season, although the data's far from complete when it comes to comparing things like this on a team-to-team basis. What is clear is that hockey fans in New York are far from happy with how the season unfolded despite the fact they took the Caps to seven games in Round 1.
Here's a comparison of Rangers ticket prices from 2008-09 and for the upcoming season:


Some of the premium seats are going up by as much as $25 a game, or more than $1,000 a season, but on a percentage basis, the upper bowl tickets get the biggest bump. A rise of $4 a game may not sound like much, but its more than $160 over a full season, and an upper bowl end zone ticket that costs $2,300 is too much for some to stomach these days. The nosebleed seats, meanwhile, are going up nearly 9 per cent, from $1,400 to $1,520.
That's not to say the building won't be full in New York this season, as they've been one of the best attended teams for years and years. Some of the die hards, however, are walking away.
0 recs |
25 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Hey, Wade Redden’s salary ain’t gunna pay for itself!
Seriously, as an NYR season subscriber, this is not surprising. Its what the market will bear right now, and a few cranky individual ticket holders are not going to change anything. The NYR is making its money off those people.
It will be interesting to see if Cablevision actually does spin off MSG/Rangers/Knicks into a separate company – and how that might affect the team and its profitability. If that early report is accurate, the MSG renovations are going to be more expensive than the initial $500 million estimate. If the costs go up substantially, and Cablevision isn’t there to help support those costs, who knows what ticket prices would be?
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Jun 1, 2009 3:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Am I reading that chart correctly?
People actually pay $240 per game to sit in a lower corner and watch Chris Drury play?
Wow. And I thought smart people lived in the city.
by garth the hoser on Jun 1, 2009 3:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Met tickets are pretty comparable to hockey tickets, actually.
Here’s a price chart for a four opera package.
You can see the best of the best in opera for under $50, no problem.
by Katebits on Jun 1, 2009 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh the strange places the comments sometimes go!
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 2, 2009 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
50$ is a lot of cash to see a fat lady sing, in my humble opinion… but that’s just me.
by Habs on Jun 2, 2009 9:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait. A Better Question
What does it cost to attend a performance at The Met?
by garth the hoser on Jun 1, 2009 3:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Those prices are better than what I paid for my partial plan last season…
by sonia on Jun 1, 2009 4:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder what input the NHL has into the prices that teams set. Bettman has to get his extra cash for bailouts from somewhere. I really wish I knew how the money works between the teams and the league. What do the teams get to save and where does the mothership get it’s money.
by hockeycountry on Jun 1, 2009 6:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
if the NYR ever do what the Yankmees did, even I will drop my tickets.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Jun 1, 2009 6:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And a comfy salary that somehow has to get paid, no doubt… Not talking about Renney’s on-going deal, too.
by Habs on Jun 2, 2009 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was to be expected.
If I remember correctly, the last time ticket prices stayed level, or were lowered, was after seven years of missing the playoffs.
I have been wondering about this for the last few seasons, though. Through the 07-08 season, tickets would go for a fair amount over face value on outlets like StubHub and the Rangers’ own TicketExchange, so you had to think that Dolan was looking at that and wondering why he was surrendering that revenue. Of course, there’s a big difference between what someone is willing to pay for a game or two, and per game for an entire season package, but still. The demand was there.
It was noticeably tougher to sell tickets this past season, at least where my seats were. I ate a few games entirely, and sold a bunch more at less than face. If the team continues to cellar dwell in offensive output, if they can’t find a way to shake the significant cap problems they have and bring some punch to the lineup, and if economic conditions continue to worsen, then that streak of packed houses that James refers to above could be in jeopardy.
Rangers, Royals, Raiders, Knicks...the man loves a winner.
by self loather on Jun 1, 2009 11:06 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Good comment. That’s what I’m hearing from a lot of Rangers fans today.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 2, 2009 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What can you say?
Sure a few long-time ticket holders will eventually drop out as the ticket prices continue their climb up Mount Kilimanjaro, but the World’s Most Famous Arena will still sell out. The Rangers are still a big attraction in the biggest city in the world, even if they suck at scoring and employ Wade Redden.
As True Blue diehards, our voices can’t and won’t ever be heard by this administration because they simply don’t care about us. We’ll keep paying until we can’t, and then someone else will take our seats and the revenue keeps flowing.
The home-y atmosphere in much of the Garden has slowly deteriorated as the years have gone by and a cleaner, corporate one has filled it – exactly what Dolan wants. With corporations comes more money. Should the renovation come through, it will be even worse. The Garden held a focus group that I was luckily a part of with seven other season ticket holders – all long-time guys. The fellow who was brought in to host the thing simply did not understand that we don’t care about new wide concourses, VIP clubs or sushi bars – we are there to watch the Rangers. The building could be broken down and decrepit (like the Coliseum) and we would still go sit in our seats, at every game. Our passion was completely foreign to him and he was completely confused. That is what we are dealing with and it isn’t likely to change anytime soon. The only way it may is far down the line when prices are so extravagant and corporations have moved up from the lower bowl to take over the place and the team goes through another Dark Age. Once the casual corporate yuppies stop coming, that is when there will be change. Until then, sucks to be us.
I have a blog too! www.scottyhockey.com
Let's Go Rangers!
by Scotty Hockey on Jun 1, 2009 11:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like another team I know…
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 2, 2009 12:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go Leafs GO!
I have a blog too! www.scottyhockey.com
Let's Go Rangers!
by Scotty Hockey on Jun 2, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t know if I agree with you on the renovations. MSG is a giant pain in the ass to get around right now. Neither the concourses inside the arena or the outside walkways by the concessions are navigable during intermissions. The seats are cramped, and the sight lines are such that if someone leans forward in their seat in front of you, they can block your view of half the ice. I agree that the on-ice product is and should be the main attraction, but it would be nice if they made a few attempts to make the fans more comfortable.
Also, as a “suit” who has a “corporate yuppie” type job yet is an avid fan, I always hate that stereotype.
Rangers, Royals, Raiders, Knicks...the man loves a winner.
by self loather on Jun 2, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
First off, I’ve sat down low and even have a friend with tix down there. There are decent people. HOWEVER stereotypes exist for a reason. One game I was invited to sit down there and was asked to be quiet so a woman could talk on her cell phone. Another time – the St. Louis turnaround our season game two years back – I went down for the third period and shootout and was the only ONLY one in my section cheering. Pathetic.
As for the renovations – would a wider concourse be nicer? Sure, no one likes having to guard their beer to make sure it doesn’t spill from all of the jostling. But at the cost of my seat location and eventually, my seat itself? Screw that. And if you don’t like your sight line, move to somewhere else. I have a seat with a wall behind me so I can stand and never miss a thing. Whatever – no need to battle other Ranger fans, Dolan is the bad guy here. At what point can we stop yelling “rape” and yell “fire” – getting everyone’s attention so change can be made?
I have a blog too! www.scottyhockey.com
Let's Go Rangers!
by Scotty Hockey on Jun 2, 2009 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
pretty much right on
i don’t really care about a renovation, i like the garden just the way it is. i HATE the new Yankee stadium, not because it isn’t a nice place, but because of what it stands for. It’s corporate america to the T and it will be a damn shame to see the Garden go the same route. It’s amazing how much Dolan and Sather simply do not give a flying.. you know what.
by Ryan McFadden on Jun 2, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Btw, that is a great pic for this article, James. Torts is all mad because prices went up, and Drury is like “oh geez, they’re gonna hate me even more now guys”, and #15 is just like “hay guyz wuts goin on in dis topik?”
http://sacrificethebody.blogspot.com/
Sacrifice the Body - Examining the NHL through statistical analysis, reasoned thought, and blind conjecture.
by IAmJoe on Jun 2, 2009 12:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Of course, the biggest problem is having four players take up half your cap space, and three of them aren’t even performing to the level that their salary suggests.
(Lundqvist being the only one that is)
"Hey! Farmboy! Maybe you can't count, but there are four of us and one of you."
"So get some more guys and then it'll be an even fight."
by Afino on Jun 2, 2009 7:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Of course the lockout/salary cap was to make the game more affordable to the average fan, right Gary?
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else
by Fauxrumors on Jun 2, 2009 8:24 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Bettman, Sather, Dolan – the Bermuda Triangle of hockey idiocy.
by Ryan McFadden on Jun 2, 2009 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its amazing how ticket prices vary from market to market and how fans react to the price hikes. The Sabres missed the playoffs for two straight seasons and still raised ticket prices by 5%. Most writers were “outraged,” yet a staggering 94% of Sabres season ticket holders renewed because, let’s face it, the tickets are still dirt cheap. I don’t know if the same will happen in NYC where there are many more sports options than in WNY.
by AnnieBeeswax on Jun 3, 2009 1:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















