The 2009 SBN NHL Mock Draft
Beginning next Friday in Montreal, all 30 NHL clubs are set to convene at the entry draft and plot a course for the future. And, with the help of blogs for every team, we here at SB Nation are about to offer some thoughts of our own leading up to the big day.
Starting tomorrow, in the 10 days leading up to the draft, SBN bloggers will unveil three picks a day in our 2009 NHL Mock Draft. On Day 1, for instance, our Islanders blog Lighthouse Hockey will pick first, followed by the Tampa gang at Raw Charge and the Avs writers at Mile High Hockey.
The rest of the schedule is as follows:
June 17: Thrashers, Kings, Coyotes
June 18: Leafs, Stars, Senators
June 19: Oilers, Predators, Wild
June 20: Sabres, Panthers, Ducks
June 21: Blue Jackets, Blues, Canadiens
June 22: Rangers, Flames, Flyers
June 23: Canucks, Devils, Capitals
June 24: Bruins, Islanders, Hurricanes
June 25: Blackhawks, Red Wings, Penguins
June 26: NHL draft begins in Montreal
All of the bloggers are looking for your input as to who they should pick, so feel free to stop by the sites for each individual team and weigh in on the discussion.
As for the actual draft itself, SBN is planning on having at least six bloggers in attendance in Montreal, so expect the coverage to be plentiful come Friday night and Saturday afternoon. I hope you'll join us for that.
0 recs |
63 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Isles need to take Tavares in terms of a business and fan perspective, but I’d rather have Hedman, the franchise defenseman.
That would leave Tavares for Tampa, and picking two franchise centers worked for Pittsburgh……
"Hey! Farmboy! Maybe you can't count, but there are four of us and one of you."
"So get some more guys and then it'll be an even fight."
by Afino on Jun 15, 2009 1:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Tampa Bay already has two franchise centers in Lecavalier and Stamkos. What do they need with a third? Hopefully, the Islanders take Tavares, otherwise, it could be sticky.
Cassie
"And will that be cash, hip check, or Raw Charge today?"
by Cassie McClellan on Jun 15, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
……yeah. That Vinny guy. I forgot about him because he was traded to Montreal.or LA, I forget.
What do you mean that didn’t happen yet?
"Hey! Farmboy! Maybe you can't count, but there are four of us and one of you."
"So get some more guys and then it'll be an even fight."
by Afino on Jun 15, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
11 years, $85 million contract extension…. Hmmm. Nope, don’t think so. Not yet.
Cassie
"And will that be cash, hip check, or Raw Charge today?"
by Cassie McClellan on Jun 15, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Eklund said it was a sure thing!
/sarcasm
You and I are gonna live forever
by Original Six on Jun 15, 2009 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crosby, Malkin, Staal… it can work.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Jun 15, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but I’d rather have Hedman, the franchise defenseman.
Ah yes, the supposed automatic franchise defenseman. Would you rather have Victor Hedman, the next Ed Jovonavski, Chris Phillips, or (poignant for Lightning fans) Roman Hamrlik than John Tavares? Would you be happy to have Erik Johnson now over Jonathon Toews?
Predicting franchise d-men at age 18 is a fool’s game. If you think Tavares is a franchise forward, pick him. Don’t take that d-man risk. It’s been since Chris Pronger that a d-man ranked in the top 5 that actually turned into a true franchise d-man… Doughty and Johnson could potentially, and Bouwmeester was close, but there are so many others that didn’t progress beyond a #2 to #4 guy.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Jun 15, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two words: Alexandre. Daigle.
No pick is a “sure thing”. We’re skewed because of Crosby and Ovechkin and Malkin in the last 5 years – otherworldly talents that haven’t been busts.
"Hey! Farmboy! Maybe you can't count, but there are four of us and one of you."
"So get some more guys and then it'll be an even fight."
by Afino on Jun 15, 2009 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But I’d rather have Joe Thornton, Vinny Lecavalier, Patrick Kane, Rick Nash, Ilya Kovalchuk, Dany Heatley, Marian Gaborik, Eric Staal, etc etc etc. HAving a good, quality top line forward go #1 is not uncommon. The Crosbys and so on ARE uncommon, but having a guy like those isn’t exactly hard to get in the top 3 or 4 picks. There just aren’t nearly the same odds for d-men drafted that high.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Jun 15, 2009 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And as a Sabres fan
Christmas is Zack Kassian.
"Hey! Farmboy! Maybe you can't count, but there are four of us and one of you."
"So get some more guys and then it'll be an even fight."
by Afino on Jun 15, 2009 1:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
We can only hope that he is still available at number 13.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Jun 15, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i cant wait to see what gem Sather unearths this year!!
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Jun 15, 2009 1:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
you mean he hasn’t already traded the pick for, like, brian campbell?
by passive_voice on Jun 15, 2009 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another splash?
1) Its Tavares no doubt. Too many reasons to take Tavares that its almost close to a no brainer . he appears to be the best player available. Would generate the most excitement. Fulfills a need for the franchise in need of a star to sell tickets/a new arena, etc.
2) The intrigue begins AFTER that pick. Does Snow make (another) splash by trading other assets to get another top 5 pick?
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else
by Fauxrumors on Jun 15, 2009 1:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
probably better off not moving into top 5 territory. unless he can get #2 or mayyyybe #3 FO CHEEP, this seems like the type of draft where the difference between players available at, say, #15 and at #5 is not worth the difference in cost.
did that sentence make sense?
by passive_voice on Jun 15, 2009 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he has assets to trade that would net him another Top 5 pick?
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Jun 15, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
1) ONLY if they are willing to put NEXT year’s #1 pick on the table(In addition to other assets)
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else
by Fauxrumors on Jun 16, 2009 6:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Draft pick
OK, everyone who’s seen Matt Duchene play, put up your hands.
Now, in the interests of full disclosure, I’m a Battalion season ticket holder and have been watching Duchene for two years.
He may not have the vision of Tavares but he’s a far better skater, does everything at top speed, has a laser shot and is almost impossible to knock off the puck down low. Add to that he’s a committed two way player and, as an added bonus, was also he OHL Academic Player of the Year.
There are hockey people out there—amongst them, NHL scouts—who think Duchene will be a better player down the road.
by John Richardson on Jun 15, 2009 1:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
There are hockey people out there—amongst them, NHL scouts—who think Duchene will be a better player down the road.
I’ve heard this said about a bunch of players over the years (he’ll be better than the #1 guy, you watch!), and it rarely ever comes to fruition. Malkin to Ovechkin is about as close as it gets, I suppose. I’m very skeptical about such comments… not to knock Duchene, but it just seems to be something said to add intrigue more than anything else.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Jun 15, 2009 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I go back to the first sentence in my post.
Have you seen Matt Duchene play?
Not to say Tavares isn’t ranked #1 for quality reasons, but some of them have to do with the inherent conservatism in hockey.
He’s been declared #1 for so long that you’d have to have a big set of brass ones to choose someone else, be it Duchene or Hedman and then try and sell it to the rest of the organization.
by John Richardson on Jun 15, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tavares wasn’t the #1 heading into the WJC’s… Hedman was. Tavares reclaimed the #1 with his performance there, espcially in contrast to Hedman’s.
I’ve seen a bit of Duchene, but not enough to make any big conclusions on. I’m going by general history.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Jun 15, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve included Duchene for a reason … I don’t think it’s out of the question that he has a great career and we debate which of these three was the best players in the end.
Just take a look at the 2006 draft:
1. Erik Johnson
2. Jordan Staal
3. Jonathan Toews
4. Nicklas Backstrom
5. Phil Kessel
So there’s some serious debate there about who the best player actual was, and many would now pick Toews or Backstrom.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 15, 2009 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And EJ still has a great shot at being the best, if he can stay away from golf carts.
"Hey! Farmboy! Maybe you can't count, but there are four of us and one of you."
"So get some more guys and then it'll be an even fight."
by Afino on Jun 15, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah you shut your mouth. Avs fans are completely content with Duchene
by Jibblescribbits on Jun 15, 2009 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What if we unearthed a photo of Hedman wearing a Foppa jersey?
You guys are the most homogeonous flip-floppers around.
All three guys are bona fide blue chips. I just find the level of collective dedication to the latest flavour of the month a bit off-putting over on MHH. I gurantee the fanbases in Long Island and Tampa never jumped ship all at once, from Tavares to Hedman to Duchene to East Asia to Eurasia.
It’s creepy how tight-knit your little clique is. You just don’t see that Borg-like single-mindedness between the readers of Christie and The Chief, yet Avs fans invariably single out Detroit for this very issue.
You needn’t worry about Duchene falling to third. I hope he does go to the Avs, as well. I simply find the Orwellian revisionism among MHH readers to be worthy of pointing out. Good luck on Draft Day.
by TD O'Dell on Jun 15, 2009 6:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
its not that
Frankly, we don’t get any exposure to draft prospects in CO. Tavares and Hedman were the only ones we knew, so when the Avs fell out of contention we named our “pursuit” of last place a cute name for the top pick in the draft. When it became clear we’d never reach that, we named it after the presumptive 2nd pick. It had nothing to do with actually wanting those guys, more that we just wanted the best player we could get.
Once the season ended and the fanbase began focusing on the draft, it became rapidly obvious that we were probably getting Duchene. He also is an Avs guy already, and probably the best fit for our needs as a 2 way scoring center.
Trust me, we’ll be happy with whatever of the 3 we get. Duchene just happens to be a great fit. Why do you care about our excitement for a high draft pick anyways? Surely you understand coping with your team sucking, as a Coyotes fan. :)
by thedoctor on Jun 15, 2009 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been called far worse than a Yotes fan
So I’ll wear that moniker proudly, if that’s the jersey I’m assigned.
To be fair to our host, DDC was not the person who coined the phrase, “Ti4T”. He simply adopted it as his own daily feature, which of course prompted his faithful readership to embrace Tavares as the be-all end-all prize at the end of the road.
As David himself pointed out today, the poll he conducted only two months ago had Tavares garnering 46% of the vote, yet something happened between then and now to cause today’s poll to show Duchene with a whopping 60% support. On James’ poll above, Duchene is favoured by only 4% of his, shall we say, less impressionable, readers.
Being an avid reader of all things Avs (not just Dater’s blog, but all things), I can assure people that since the picture of 12-year old Duchene surfaced, the overwhelming opinion among DDC’s faithful displayed a sea change away from Tavares. If that’s not an interesting anecdote, then surely I am as boring and easily amused as people tell me.
Regardless, the MHH poll that once showed massive support for Tavares, contrasted against your assertion (and today’s poll results) that “once the season ended and the fanbase began focusing on the draft” was the catalyst for that sea change, further proves my accusation Orwellian revisionist history that I levelled at you.
Or did I level it against someone else? In fact, isn’t the fact that Jibbles post above simply echoed your own earlier post, and that you responded to what I said to Jibbles, also proof that the wagon-circling I mentioned earlier at least somewhat prevalent?
As for not actually wanting Hedman, please don’t make me cite the endless threads that dispute that claim. I tip my hat to SlamDunk for maintaining a consistent man-crush for the big Swede. If not for his vote and my own consistent support for Tavares, today’s MHH poll might have been as lopsided as the stupid “Would you rather keep Lappy or ditch Tucker” poll that DDC ran the other day.
Why do I care, you ask? Because I happen to be a huge Avs fan. But just because I don’t always toe MHH’s company line, I was made quite unwelcome there (Is there another SBN site that threatens “Banning people is fun” so overtly?), but that doesn’t stop me from reading. DDC is an exceptional blogger and his recruitment of Jori was an amzing coup. When you say that you “don’t get any exposure to draft prospects in CO”, you do her a huge disservice.
I am glad that Jibbles recruited you on his own site, and I look forward to your own take. I implore you to retain your own voice, as the Avs blogosphere needs some local content (other than Jori, of course). If you took offence from anything I’ve said here or in my previous post, know that it is not personal.
I am somehow able to piss off Gerald AND J.Michael on consecutive days, which is no easy feat. I am able to come across as a Yotes fan, while simultaneously bashing Wyshynski for his decidedly uber-jingoist slant on the subject. I can get the entire PPP gang up in arms, despite owning a Felix Potvin AND Gilmour jersey.
I’m probably just a troll, so take everything I have to say with an entire shaker of salt. As Avs fans, we don’t need to agree on everything, do we?
Keep up the good work. I eagerly await your training camp reports.
by TD O'Dell on Jun 15, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I frankly had no clue what team you were rooting for.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 15, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
PPP will gladly out me
So I may as well come clean.
I am a former Nords fan, living in Ottawa, who adopted the Leafs, until the Sens came to town, but whose parents were die-hard Habs fans.
My sympathy for the Yotes is rooted in my passion for the underdog, and a pinch of small-market empathy.
My affinity for the Avs was in danger of waning with the passing of the old guard, until SoS (the young centreman, not the serial killer) came along to carry on his father’s legacy.
I should also note that I have been known to correctly predict a Chicago WCF loss as well as a Pens appearance in the Finals (though Luongo’s failure to hoist the Cup made my bracket quite unimpressive). When I picked the Hawks in October, it may have been tied to my love of spin-o-ramas, so I demoted them under Coach Q to also-rans.
What else?
I guess you could say I’m a Crosby fan from way back (but who can’t?). A part of me wanted Hossa to be the first ever Sens draftee to win the Cup, but my heart was with Pittsburgh.
I’m just a whore. But not a bandwagon type. Give me your poor, your tired, your sub .500 masses, and I can find something I like about them.
In other words, a Wings-hater by default. ;-)
jk
not really
by TD O'Dell on Jun 15, 2009 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i assumed you were a Yotes fan, based on your blog memberships. my bad.
Look, it’s not a big deal, I wigged out on you too, but you seemed pretty determined to rain on the Duchene parade. I’m sure we are groupthinking a bit, but I stand by what I said just the same — it’s definitely how my thought process went. Jori is awesome, but focuses on our own prospects, and she’s about my only exposure to prospects. shrug
and you should post at MHH more if you’re an avs fan! how can you not even be a member there? :)
by thedoctor on Jun 16, 2009 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh and don’t expect anything earth shaking from the prospect reports. im…not exactly an expert.
by thedoctor on Jun 16, 2009 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Prospects report?
I thought I read that you’d be attending Camp, and assumed you meant the main camp.
Rookie camp is even more ambitious an assignment. I you get stuck, just peak over Jori’s shoulder at here notes.
Either way, September can’t come soon enough. In the meantime, you and Jibbles should conduct a Draft Day / Free Agent Hotstove on your site, to compete with MHH for views. Do it like point-counterpoint and I’ll be sure to hit that page multiple times.
Let me get you started:
“Jibbles, you ignorant slut…”
Ain’t I a stinker?
by TD O'Dell on Jun 16, 2009 12:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will attend dev camp and hopefully see Duchene, and hopefully rookie camp/training camp for a day too. Jori will be there most every day though for all of them, if past performance tells us anything.
I just hope I catch some scimmages. Last dev camp I went to they just drilled all day, and it’s not exactly conducive to good insight…
by thedoctor on Jun 16, 2009 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve never seen a development camp, so I wouldn’t know what to expect. If Sacco is anything like Herb Brooks, keep an eye on who is the last to puke. ;-)
by TD O'Dell on Jun 16, 2009 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t even realize that my memberships were publicly visible. Now that you tipped me off, I’ll start wearing pants.
Look, I’m obviously a hot head and upon just now re-reading my own posts, I obviously also have no knowledge of the Preview feature (could my grammar and incoherent ramblings be any worse?)
Jibbles and i have butted heads before on subjects even more trivial than this. I probably just singled out his post to get a rise out of him, knowing how much he once agreed with SlamDunk about Hedman being the man.
[update] I just saw Ol’ Slammy himself, out of the corner of my eye, so lemme scroll down and see what he has to say. Suffice it to say that I regret some of my earlier comments, or at least the tone thereof, the way a wife-beater later asks for forgiveness. Just sayin.
by TD O'Dell on Jun 16, 2009 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll be the first to admit I’ve been back and forth on the Hedman-Duchene debate.
I thing a Norris-caliber defensieman is still the #1 biggest factor in winning a Stanley Cup, and Hedman has that potential, but a great 2-way center is kind of factor #1b .
Also, I don’t think there’s a wrong decision.
by Jibblescribbits on Jun 16, 2009 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what makes our debate seem almost moot
There is no wrong decision.
My Sens, with their newly-appointed President (you guys should try that in CO), are faced with a decision almost as tough as Tampa’s – who do we take in Round 1?
Tavares’ captain, Kadri? The guy who will lead the NHL in A’s, Svensson? Schenn will surely be as gone as Heatley, thanks to Clouston’s forechecking system that bumped us down to 9th.
Maybe we can score Jared Cowen. Maybe we can trade picks with Minnesota (for the rights to Gaborik), if Schroeder is their man. I’m sure Bryan Murray envies Sherman, not only for his top 3 pick, but also for his no-brainer position of selecting whoever falls out of the top 3.
After witnessing the boos from the Scotiabank crowd when he selected Karlsson ahead of Del Zotto and Eberle, Murray will be looking to prove himself with a Swedish defender – hopefully this year.
I felt bad for Karlsson. Much more so than for Carey Price. I wonder how Habs fans will react to Gainey’s first choice next week.
by TD O'Dell on Jun 16, 2009 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no worries dude. I’ll be happy with whatever one we get.
by thedoctor on Jun 16, 2009 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey!
People I don’t know are talking about me!
In all seriousness, I just think Hedman is where it’s at. I think he’s the best fit for the franchise at this particular moment and I think he’s going to be the best pro player of the three.
Man-crush GET.
If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! HOW can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Jun 16, 2009 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We wants the Funk. Bring that mother out.
Sorry for name-dropping like I know you. When we we all gaga over Johnny T, you were the first to break ranks and embrace the giant Swede. Now, I cling to you as my inspiration for dissenting from the Duchene-mad crowd.
I still think Vic is a riskier and less-immediate investment, but I also don’t see Duchene leaving Brampton this year, so JT is the only answer for me.
Again, I apologize for making your ears burn. Apply this ointment, and you should get some relief.
by TD O'Dell on Jun 16, 2009 12:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh
I don’t mind the attention. I kind of just figured MHH thought of me as the resident loon for my blatant Hedman love. Tavares is an awesome prospect, but I’m a defense-first kind of guy.
After watching the Avs repeatedly playing awful defense, the wave of defensive prospects we have can’t get here soon enough. As with every wave of prospects, I expect some of our guys to be busts and I don’t think you can ever too many solid defensive prospects. Also, in the concept of team-building, it seems easier to find the scoring forward than the stout, first-pairing defenseman.
And Hedman is an absolute beast.
If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! HOW can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Jun 16, 2009 1:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hedman is a beast
And has the upside to become a Norris-calibre Prongeresque stalwart.
One problem I have with him, though, is that he seems ready to make the jump right away. With the money CO has locked up on their blueline already, Hedman’s 2.9M cap-hit would cripple Sherman’s chances of adding a number one goalie.
While it would be nice to have that kind of problem, I just think Duchene in the OHL for another year better suits the salary structure. Adding Tavares with the third pick would cause the same problem for Sherman, but his immediate impact (see: Stamkos 2009-present) would be a better investment than another 3 million dollar defender on the third pairing.
Long-term, maybe Hedman is the way to go, but can the Avs afford to be thinking long-term when there are real 2009 problems to be addressed?
Maybe. Maybe not.
by TD O'Dell on Jun 16, 2009 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
again, as a canucks fan
if you guys end up with hedman, i’m dancing a jig.
by passive_voice on Jun 16, 2009 3:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Point out
I just want to point out that most Avs fans (and most hockey people for that matter) haven’t seen Duchene, Hedman, or Tavares play all that much, certainly not as much as scouts, so fans changing their mind about which prospect they want shouldn’t be all that surprising, and it’s not unreasonable that minds change as more information comes in.
I haven’t seen any of the three play, so I just go on scouting reports (the ones I can find), which is why I’m happy with Hedman, Duchene, or Tavares. Duchene seems the likely pick so I’ve talked myself into him. If Tampa or NIY take Duchene, I’ll easily be
by Jibblescribbits on Jun 16, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My opinion of the Tavares / Hedman matchup was likely cemented at a time when JT’s stock was peaking and Hedman’s was starting to come down.
Two weeks before the IIHF U-20 tourney began, the Taveres-less Generals came to town and got spanked 10-0 by the 67’s, while Johnny T was at sleepaway camp. As a Bay Area resident, I envy you for the chance to attend countless Logan Couture games in the future. On that night in December, Couture and company showed the world just how much Oshawa depended on Tavares to remain competitive.
Fast-forward three weeks and I’m watching Tavares lead Team Canada to a come-from-behind victory over Team USA, in what proved to be the best hockey game of 2008 (it took a full 365 days to crown that winner). Complete with live bands and several giant screens, the New Year’s Eve outdoor viewing party on the frozen Rideau Canal could not be stopped by NBC, who would broadcast the Wrigley game 16 hours later.
Long story short (I know, I know…too late), an American kid on the bench who swiped someone with his stick was the Carcillo-on-Talbot moment that turned the tide and sparked Tavares and his teammates to their momentus comeback. A mile downstream from the site of Oshawa’s humilating defeat, thousands of revellers almost broke through the ice with the celebration that followed Johnny T’s hat-trick goal to seal it.
Game notes: Avs’ prospect Shattenkirk was amazing in the game; Duchene’s mentor, Cody Hodgson, scored the game-winner; 2nd overall vanRiemsdyk was pretty flat; Evander Kane showed flashes of brilliance; fans were less than enthusiastic after Sens’ 1st-rounder O’Brien gave the Americans a 3-0 lead in the first period.
I had tickets a couple of nights later to watch Filatov and the Russians eliminate the Czech team in the quarters, as well as upper bowl seats to watch Team Canada advance to the Finals against those same Russians with Tavares netting the shootout winner. What I failed to secure, however, were tickets to see Hedman live in the Finals. From the comfort of my living room, however, I saw Tavares skating circles around the Swedish defencemen.
If I hadn’t already made up my mind, that tourney put Tavares squarely ahead of Hedman in my mind, as well as ranking him slightly higher than Duchene’s better teammate, Hodgson. I only saw a few playoff games featuring Brampton or London, so I’m certainly not the person to say whether Duchene was better than Tavares in April / May. Going back to January, however, there is not a person alive who would have suggested Tavares lose his top-billing to either Hedman or Duchene. Evander Kane was probably higher than young Matt, at that point in time.
Times change. I was looking forward to Jared Cowen going third overall.
by TD O'Dell on Jun 16, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i can’t wish any harm on the guy, so i just hope (as a canucks fan) that duchene develops an intense dislike for the game of hockey seconds after being drafted. or, alternatively, that tampa takes duchene and you guys get hedman.
by passive_voice on Jun 15, 2009 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obvs, baby Schenn wants to go to a warm team to keep that tan up….
(843): the red head has a bf
(1-843): just because there's a goalie doesn't mean u can't score
by wrap around curl on Jun 15, 2009 2:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Or maybe just the Leafs.
They always seem to have a pretty long summer.
"Without good hard work, it is impossible to reach the pinnacle of success." - Anatoli Tarasov
by PRC on Jun 15, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I see the “who to pick” debate has already started up, but let me just be the first to say that this SBN draft thing is an awesome idea, and can’t wait to see it executed.
Will regular commentors at each team’s blog become a sort of managerial braintrust? Will the debates we see in the comments mirror the same conversations that scouts have on draft day?
And will there be a main “draft board” where we can follow the picks as they roll in?
"Sweet Zarley Zalapski, Batman!"
by ZarleyZalapski on Jun 15, 2009 2:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes, the main draft board will be here, and then the individual blogs will be discussing each team’s pick. Should work out well I think.
The Isles blog will unveil its pick at 6:30 a.m. tomorrow and I’ll have the big board with the first three picks up shortly after that.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 15, 2009 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What happens if Phoenix moves to Hamilton? Do you have an alternate blog/fan crew ready to go just in case to make the pick? :)
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Jun 15, 2009 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A) Not happening
B) No.
Support Your Local Coyotes Blog! -
Five For Howling
by OdinMercer on Jun 15, 2009 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t worry bud, he’s just kidding.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 15, 2009 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know. Just representin’. :P
Support Your Local Coyotes Blog! -
Five For Howling
by OdinMercer on Jun 15, 2009 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait a minute...
No draft takes from the Sharks, Avalanche or Lightning? What gives?
I has good practice. Mike Grier keep shooting puck at me, and my confidence boosted very more. - "Evgeni Nabokov"
by Nael M. on Jun 15, 2009 4:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Read closer in the post. The Avs and Lightning are both covered by Mile High and Bolt Charge respectively. And I suspect the Sharks are left out because they don’t have a first round pick, so naturally, a first round mock draft doesn’t include them.
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
by bkblades on Jun 15, 2009 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Err, Raw Charge. Apologies to the Lightning guys and gals over there!
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
by bkblades on Jun 15, 2009 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sharks don’t have a first round pick.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 15, 2009 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Request
Can I make the Blue Jackets pick? I know I don’t follow them, but I’ll probably do better than Doug MacLean ever did (except when Rick Nash fell in his lap)?
by Jibblescribbits on Jun 15, 2009 4:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















