From The Rink: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Salary cap to stay in $57-million range

Both the NHL and the NHLPA confirm the players have voted to apply the five percent inflator, meaning the salary cap for next season will stay the same or rise slightly, just above $57-million. The league has been telling general managers and owners that the cap number could be $57.1-million, up a few hundred thousand from last season's maximum of $56.7-million.

— TSN.ca

And here's a look at how the salary cap's progressed postlockout, assuming $57.1-million is about where it lands for next season:

Nhl_salary_cap_medium

In a general sense, a flat cap indicates flat revenues, although the 5-per-cent inflator we've heard so much about lately does tweak those results by about $2-million either way. Commissioner Gary Bettman asked the players to not use the inflator last season, but they disagreed and bumped the cap up to $56.7-million, which resulted in large escrow payments at the end of the year.

This time around, the NHLPA again wanted the inflator used so that the cap would remain relatively the same rather than fall into the $54-million range. The danger there is that, if revenues fall this coming season, as expected, escrow totals would be even higher than this past season and take a big bite out of players' paychecks.

No wonder we're hearing about two potential big stadium games.

If I had to guess where the cap's going in the future, my money would be on it remaining below $60-million for another season or two beyond 2009-10. If escrow continues to rise, the NHLPA will likely back off using the inflator and really tighten team payrolls on the top end.

And, by that point, we'll be looking at the two sides working on a new CBA. Oh joy.

UPDATE TSN is reporting the cap figure for next season will be $56.8-million. The salary floor, as always, will be $16-million lower at $40.8-million.

0 recs  |  Comment 9 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from From The Rink

The NHL's next big problem

Sep 2009 by James Mirtle - 87 comments

The NHL's salary cap deadline

Aug 2009 by James Mirtle - 9 comments

Comments

Display:

What % was escrow this past season, and whats the predicted escrow for 2009-10 going to be?

I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else

by Fauxrumors on Jun 26, 2009 11:29 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I believe it was about 15 per cent this season. Projecting it is not really possible as it’s based entirely on how much teams spend this off-season and the revenues coming in next year.

Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com

by James Mirtle on Jun 26, 2009 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“And, by that point, we’ll be looking at the two sides working on a new CBA. Oh joy.”

Should go just as well as the current ownership situation. Why do I have a feeling in 20 years I will be paying $5 to see these guys skate in a cornfield in December because the league imploded?

The population of Pominville keeps rising!

by Blackcapricorn on Jun 26, 2009 11:38 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Winnipeg might be able to afford a team then!

by Resolute on Jun 26, 2009 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This time around, Bettman wanted the inflator used so that the cap would remain relatively the same rather than fall into the $54-million range.

James, it was my fairly clear impression that the NHL was pushing to NOT apply the 5%.

by Gerald on Jun 26, 2009 11:53 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I’m going to have to edit the post on this as I can’t find a source indicating either way. I’d thought I’d read coming out of his meeting with the PA that Bettman recommended they vote for the inflator.

Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com

by James Mirtle on Jun 26, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It seems to me that keeping the cap the same or slightly rising would be best for the majority of teams, since long-term, big money contracts wouldn’t be eating up cap room.

If the cap fluctuates up and down a bit over the next season, is it possible GMs will start setting up large contracts in terms of percentage of the season’s cap hit?

by Its Cold In Here on Jun 26, 2009 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s not an option under this CBA.

Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com

by James Mirtle on Jun 26, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

$40.4m to $56.8m is the salary range for 2009-10, according to Brent Wallace of TSN (on TSN’s draft day blog). Up only $100,000 from last year.

Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.

by saskhab on Jun 26, 2009 12:30 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to James Mirtle's hockey blog

Start posting on From The Rink »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

450px-flag_of_saint_vincent_and_the_grenadines
Jhonas Enroth gets first career start in 4-2 loss
Cale_sbnationphoto_small
A Double-Tiered NHL: How (and Why) It Could Work
Small-logo_small
Ian Penny's letter to the NHLPA
Small-logo_small
For those who really, really like SBN Hockey blogs
Nhl-and-food-network_small
What constitutes goaltender interference these days?
Kane88_nhl2010_small
What constitutes a clean hit?
Rugby_small
Some Facts on Arena Readiness and New Markets
Kane88_nhl2010_small
Donald Fehr to become the leader of the NHLPA?
Armchair_red_3_small
30 Dirty Players in 30 Days.
Small
Russia: The New Land of the Free for Hockey Players?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Blog extras

"Mirtle's performance during this year's Trade Deadline became its own tribe in Brazil."



(c) 2008 James Mirtle. This blog is a personal project and not affiliated with The Globe and Mail.


Blogger-in-chief

Small-logo_small James Mirtle

Moderator(s)

Calvin_small PPP

643c0d9c_small saskhab