The Blues today bought out the final year of defenseman Jay McKee’s contract. McKee was due to make $4 million for the 2009-2010 season, completing a four-year, $16 million contract he signed in 2006. The Blues will be responsible for two-thirds of the $4 million, payable over a two-year period.
— St. Louis Post Dispatch (and check SLGT for more)
7 months ago
James Mirtle
17 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
He was never the same after his collision with Mario Lemieux in 2001…..
Granted, he was still an elite shot blocker up until he got to St. Louis, but his effectiveness as a defenseman peaked in those playoffs.
by Afino on Jun 29, 2009 2:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess I was wrong…..he was still in the top 10 in the NHL in shot blocks last year.
by Afino on Jun 29, 2009 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
…and the buy-out period ends relatively quietly?
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else
by Fauxrumors on Jun 29, 2009 3:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Only McKee, Mclean, and McSchaefer.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Jun 29, 2009 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The buyout period goes until tomorrow, no?
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 29, 2009 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nevermind, it ends tonight. The three fellows Bruce mentioned are the ones on the outs.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jun 29, 2009 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m kinda surprised the Wings didn’t buy anyone out. Cap space would be nice.
http://sacrificethebody.blogspot.com/
Sacrifice the Body - Examining the NHL through statistical analysis, reasoned thought, and blind conjecture.
by IAmJoe on Jun 29, 2009 5:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The only real candidates for buyouts probably wouldn’t buy them that mush space, I’m guessing. And if they bought out someone more expensive, they’d still have to spend money to fill the roster space with someone anyway.
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on Jun 29, 2009 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Somewhat of a shock . . .
but not much of a shock. Underperformed for the money, which given the massive amounts of cash he was given, that couldn’t have been TOO unexpected. I guess what I didn’t expect was the Note to take this kind of action and cap hit considering this might be one of their most important offseasons . . . like, ever.
Did like watching him play when he could, but the dude’s ssssslllllooooowwwww and has little to no offensive ability, below average even for a stay-at-home defenseman.
"The world is getting to be such a dangerous place, a man is lucky to get out of it alive." -- W.C. Fields
by Donut King on Jun 29, 2009 8:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It says a hell of a lot about the state of the NHL when a team on shaky financial ground like St. Louis willingly eats almost 3 million in cash.
I’m assuming the Blues did their homework and tried to find out if anyone would take him on re-entry waivers. I’m also assuming that since they bought him out, nobody was interested in McKee for even 2M next season. Pretty telling, I think.
by Make a play Whitner on Jun 29, 2009 10:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You wonder why they wouldn’t just send him to the minors to get his cap hit off the books. It doesn’t make much sense to pay 2/3 of the contract and take the cap hit both this year and next year when they could have sent him to the minors, paid his salary for this year and avoided the cap hit for next year (where its likely to drop).
"Never surrender opportunity for security."
--Branch Rickey
by brozer on Jun 29, 2009 11:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If they were the Flyers, Rangers, or Red Wings I’m sure they would. But paying out 2.7 or so million instead of 4 million is a big deal to a team like St. Louis (and most others in the NHL).
by Make a play Whitner on Jun 29, 2009 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No one thinks the Blues will spend to the cap
Their number is artificially inflated anyway with bonuses to first round players that won’t be paid but count nonetheless.
www.stlouisgametime.com
by Brad Lee on Jun 30, 2009 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is exactly the kinda guy Glen Sather loves – a 4th-6th defensemen who eats up cap and roster space that could go to someone cheaper and with more potential.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Jun 30, 2009 12:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m surprised Tucker wasn’t bought out. Ohh wait, we’re talking about the Avalanche front office. I should say I’m surprised he wasn’t offered a raise…
2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity
by Mike @ MHH on Jun 30, 2009 8:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
For all we know, he was offered a raise. Then Bill Daly informed the Avs brass that that was illegal.
In about 14 hours, however, they could re-introduce that offer to Tucker and be within the CBA rules, so keep your fingers crossed.
by TD O'Dell on Jun 30, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Join the community and dive in!
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
Blog extras
Latest Puck Daddy - NHL from Yahoo! Sports
- Kari Lehtonen traded to Dallas, Turco move to come?
- Puck Previews: 'Hawks, Stars battle; Franzen in for Sweden?
- Evgeni Nabokov puts his name in the Vezina race
- Puck Daddy chats with Brandon Yip about life as a rookie, his first NHL game, Colorado’s success this season and the upcoming Olympics
- Puck Headlines: Getzlaf ankle worry; Quick's Olympic mask
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
