Bowmans take over in Chicago

CSN's Josh Mora is reporting that the Blackhawks have fired GM Dale Tallon and an official announcement will be made on Tuesday. Tallon has recently come under fire when the team failed to get qualifying offers out in time to several restricted free agents including Kris Versteeg. Stan Bowman will replace Tallon as GM.
The photo at the top there dates July 31, 2008, less than 12 months ago when there were big smiles all around as one of the top coaches in NHL history joined his son, Stanley, with the Blackhawks' brain trust.
If it wasn't a ruse, looking back, it sure seemed like one.
In September of 2008, Joel Quenneville was hired as a pro scout by the 'Hawks. Four games into the season, he became the team's head coach when the front office tied a can to Denis Savard.
And, from that point on, we heard rumours, whispers and outright proclamations that Dale Tallon — smiling, at left — would be the next to go.
This is a team being run, first and foremost, by owner Rocky Wirtz, his hand-picked president in John McDonough and their prized front office free agent acquisition in William Scott Bowman — three undoubtedly brilliant men that are all aiming to win this formerly woebegone franchise its first Cup in a half century.
And soon.
They've all been successful, to varying degrees, and the turnaround in Chicago with this hockey team has been incredible since Bill Wirtz's passing. But Tallon's one of the few remaining ties to that awful era, a front office holdover from the franchise's dark ages that went from the ice, to the broadcast booth, to director of player personnel in 1998, to assistant GM under Bob Pulford in 2003 and finally GM in 2005.
Tallon was a lifer on what had become a loser franchise, a misfit among the outsiders who had been brought in to revolutionize the way business had been done for so long in the Windy City. And his mistakes, while not plentiful, were all over the roster, from the many millions committed to two netminders last season to the boat anchor of a deal given to Brian Campbell, who's fallen to a distant third on the blueline depth chart as the team's undervalued youth grew into their roles.
Chicago was the sixth-best team in the NHL last season and went all the way to the final four in the playoffs, accomplishing all that not two years after drafting Patrick Kane first overall. Tallon had helped haul this team up a heckuva mountain, but he was never viewed as the one to put him over the top, not with a legend peering over his shoulder with a son named after the trophy they were chasing at his side.
This was always going to be the Bowmans' ship, and now that it is, it'll be fascinating to see if they can pull it off. Tallon had his successes, sure, but what he needed was the pedigree, the "proof" of greatness that hangs around some like a cloud.
At 75, this is one last wild ride for Scotty — and I'm sure he's loving every minute of it.
0 recs |
20 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Does anyone have the number for a good dry-cleaner because
old Scotty B.‘s suit is covered in Tallon’s blood.
by Sneps-ish on Jul 14, 2009 8:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately, Tallon’s wounds were mostly self-inflicted.
by mc keeper on Jul 14, 2009 8:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. The Tallon contracts always baffled me. Khabibulin was not an addition for a team in rebuild mode. He would have been a great addition for a team at this stage (looking for the final piece). Campbell was ridiculous. And now you have a team that is right up against the cap and will have a tough situation to get Kane, Toews and Keith to it under the cap.
My problem with the way the Hawks do this is why do they wait? Savard took care of training camp and the first 4 games. Tallon was in charge on Free Agent day.
They knew both men would be let go… Why wait?
by Gusinabox on Jul 14, 2009 8:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Giving them enough rope to hang themselves, presumably. There wasn’t really a definitive reason to fry Tallon before. This QO debacle is perfect justification.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there)
by Doogie2K on Jul 14, 2009 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would Wirtz need a justification to fire Tallon if thats what he wanted to do last year? From a PR perspective, its hard to think firing a GM would outweigh all the goodwill Wirtz has built up in Chicago – games on TV, Winter Classic, putting a young exciting team on the ice. And even if there was a PR issue involved, replacing him with a guy the Bowman Family probably won’t hurt.
I know GMs have contracts and all, and Ive never seen one – but lets face it – GMs are basically employees at will, fireable for any or no reason. The contract is really there more for the GM’s purposes – because when they get fired, they will likely still get paid or get some form of compensation. James do you have insight into how these contracts usually work?
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Jul 14, 2009 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There was no good time to do this, really, even though the writing had been on the door the moment Scotty joined the club. I doubt many would argue about that. After the unexpected playoff successes, a firing directly after the season would have been more uncomfortable still; and firing a GM just before the draft isn’t necessarily desirable where it’s crucial that everyone is on the same page (besides, I gather scouting isn’t Stan Bowman’s most prominent area of expertise); and then firing him around July 1st isn’t ideal either, as it might carry a note of uncertainty or instability to UFAs.
This QO thing became their gift, I guess, as unfortunate as it is.
My worry is this is a team put together by Tallon and Dudley, contract blunders aside, and I get the sense that Tallon was very well liked by the players. Now both are gone. It’s an extremely young team, I doubt they’ll be immune to the perceived instability.
by ChicoMaki on Jul 14, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that the QO provided justification. But this is where you gain respect for Lamoriello when he fired Julien for seemingly no reason, and Gainey for firing Carbo when he did. When you know the decision you’re going to make, just make it. Take the backlash.
In both cases, inaction hurt the team. A Blackhawks team that would have had Quenneville running the show from day 1 would have been stronger longer. Keeping Tallon invited more bad contracts.
My worry is this is a team put together by Tallon and Dudley, contract blunders aside, and I get the sense that Tallon was very well liked by the players. Now both are gone. It’s an extremely young team, I doubt they’ll be immune to the perceived instability.
This is a fair question, but I think that Savard’s firing introduced this young team to the business of hockey. Plus this team is surrounded by Quenneville and Scotty Bowman, both of whom create stability.
by Gusinabox on Jul 14, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How nervous should Quenneville be if the Blackhawks get off to a sluggish start next year, though? With Scotty Bowman in the front office, a precedent set for an early firing with fabricated cover, and clearly the expectations are through the roof …
I’d think I would be nervous.
I agree that the QO provided justification. But this is where you gain respect for Lamoriello when he fired Julien for seemingly no reason, and Gainey for firing Carbo when he did. When you know the decision you’re going to make, just make it. Take the backlash.
Agreed. If you want to make a move for the best interests of the team, then just do it instead of waiting for the “proper moment” – especially if you have to fabricate some kind of public relations fig leaf as a cover.
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle." -- Philo of Alexandria
by Baroque on Jul 14, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was probably primarily Scotty Bowman who “engineered” Q’s takeover in the first place. Left to Tallon alone, I bet he wouldn’t have pulled the trigger on Savard, a close friend.
by ChicoMaki on Jul 14, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, that clears up my wondering a bit. He would then have every reason to believe that either he would be fairly safe, or that at least he wouldn’t be blindsided by a change because he was unaware of the thoughts of the front office.
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle." -- Philo of Alexandria
by Baroque on Jul 14, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point about Savard. And let me be clear, I don’t think the team is going to collapse under this or anything, I just think it’s one of those things that’ll rest strangely on their heads for a while. Stan Bowman has had a lot of contact with the Hawks’ AHL team, Rockford, over the last few years, so it’s not like he’s an unknown entity to the players. I guess I just don’t like seeing so much change so quickly after such a successful season. As a fan, after such great strides, I hate to see even a hint of disarray in the front office.
by ChicoMaki on Jul 14, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’d be well liked by the players too if you handed out stupid contracts for way too much money.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
by Chemmy on Jul 14, 2009 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It has to be asked...
…do you think they fired Tallon by fax/courier or did they send him his pink slip in the mail?
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
by zyllyx on Jul 14, 2009 8:46 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
They probably slipped it under his door, a la Billy Reay. Nice to see that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
I've seen enough to know that I've seen too much.
by Smoboy41 on Jul 14, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like they shifted Tallon into a “senior advisor” role:
http://www.kuklaskorner.com/index.php/hockey/comments/blackhawks_make_it_official/
Sez Tallon: "This is what is best for the Chicago Blackhawks." Hmm…
"Sweet Zarley Zalapski, Batman!"
by ZarleyZalapski on Jul 14, 2009 10:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Is Bowman going to be a particularly good GM? I know he understands hockey like no one else, but this role seems to leave his best skill largely irrelevant. What Scotty is better at than anyone else is playing head games with his players. He knows how to motivate them. He knows how to be a complete asshole to them in a way that gets the most out of them, and, unlike most of the breed, he is very, very good at knowing just how far he can push people without it becoming counter-productive. (I would argue that, in the long run, his manipulation almost wrecked Sergei Federov, but the Wings were able to just let him go at that point.)
The problem is that this is the realm of the bench coach, not the GM.
by J. Michael Neal on Jul 14, 2009 11:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you saying that Stan is just going to be his father’s puppet/
I've seen enough to know that I've seen too much.
by Smoboy41 on Jul 14, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry. I misunderstood. Thought all the pictures of Scotty meant he was taking over. I know nothing at all about Stan.
by J. Michael Neal on Jul 14, 2009 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s Stan Bowman replacing Tallon, not Scotty.
i.e. Stan doing Scotty’s bidding
by XxMJ20xX on Jul 14, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, should be ?
I've seen enough to know that I've seen too much.
by Smoboy41 on Jul 14, 2009 11:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















