July 1 Roundup: 46 players signed, $406-million spent
I'm fairly certain that was a record in terms of spending on July 1 for the NHL. Here's a timeline as to what was spent per hour on Wednesday, from noon until midnight:

So those were the hours to tune into the TSN gabfest.
Here's a look back at the 20 biggest money deals, from Anderson to Zanon, and my thoughts after the jump:
- Marian Hossa, Chicago, 12 years, $5.23-million per
- Marian Gaborik, NY Rangers, five years, $7.5-million per
- Mike Cammalleri, Montreal, five years, $6-million per
- Martin Havlat, Minnesota, six years, $5-million per
- Mattias Ohlund, Tampa Bay, seven years, $3.75-million per
- Brian Gionta, Montreal, five years, $5-million per
- Mike Komisarek, Toronto, five years, $4.5-million per
- Nikolai Khabibulin, Edmonton, four years, $3.75-million per
- Jaroslav Spacek, Montreal, three years, $3.83-million per
- Steve Sullivan, Nashville, two years, $3.75-million per
- Erik Cole, Carolina, two years, $2.9-million per
- Mike Knuble, Washington, two years, $2.8-million per
- John Madden, Chicago, one year, $2.75-million
- Sami Pahlsson, Columbus, three years, $2.65-million per
- Dwayne Roloson, NY Islanders, two years, $2.5-million per
- Hal Gill, Montreal, two years, $2.25-million per
- Chris Neil, Ottawa, four years, $2-million per
- Greg Zanon, Minnesota, three years, $1.93-million per
- Craig Anderson, Colorado, two years, $1.8-million per
- Matt Walker, Tampa Bay, four years, $1.7-million per
The savviest moves: Pahlsson to the Blue Jackets is a bargain at that price, although it'll be interesting what sort of offence he can provide given he replaces Manny Malhotra. I really like Colorado taking a chance on Anderson, especially at that price. The Wild made out well in getting Zanon and Havlat, who signed a smaller contract that the one he was on the past three years despite coming off a solid season. Carolina reupped with Cole for quite a bit less than he was making previously, and he could pay off at that salary, and the Blackhawks should benefit from the Madden signing. I also liked what the Capitals did in getting Knuble, who will play well with Ovechkin, and thought the Preds did well under their budget by locking up Sullivan and Ward.
On the fence: I love what Gaborik brings to the table as an offensive player — he's one of the five or six most dynamic players in the league, and that was playing in Minnesota — but his health is always going to be a concern and that's a huge ticket. The Rangers also now desperately need help at centre, which was the major issue with dumping Scott Gomez. Ohlund is a good fit in Tampa in that he'll work well with Victor Hedman, but they had to overpay to woo him to a dysfunctional franchise. And I'll say this much for what Bob Gainey's doing in Montreal: This team isn't any worse than it was in 2008-09. Everyone but Gill is overpaid, but that doesn't show up in the standings if they all produce and these are character players.
Radim Vrbata errata: I have no clue why anyone wanted to pay Neil that kind of money. (This is officially the worst two-year fall from Cup finalist in league history.) Ditto for Komisarek, who while a serviceable defensive defenceman, is not a major upgrade over someone like Zanon or Rob Scuderi. (Seriously, look at the numbers.) And as for the Khabibulin deal, Tyler Dellow's convinced me it really wasn't the way to go:
Goalies don’t do keep playing very far beyond the age of 36, which was Khabibulin’s age by hockey-reference.com’s calculation. 28 goalies in NHL history have played at least 35 games at the age of 36. 18 goalies in NHL history have played at least 35 games at the age of 37. 10 goalies in NHL history have played at least 35 games at the age of 38. 8 goalies in NHL history have played at least 35 games at the age of 39. 4 goalies in NHL history have played at least 35 games at the age of 40.
Sure the cap hit looks low for someone of Khabibulin's stature, but he was an older goaltender when he signed that deal in Chicago, and now he's on the verge of being a really old goaltender. Nine months ago, we were talking about the Blackhawks forcing him into being put out to pasture in the KHL! Besides, the number of 37-year-old 'tenders that have had good seasons is a lot lower than 18, and I have a hard time seeing the Oilers getting value out of this contract beyond the first or second year.
Besides, where else was Khabibulin going to go? What leverage did he have in negotiations? And wouldn't either he or Marty Biron have taken a discount in order to fill the last starter's role in the league? Let them bid each other down.
But, alas, that makes too much sense, and it was, after all, July 1.
0 recs |
51 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Good times...
July 1st is always a doozy. Great blogging and tweeting today, Dr. Mirtle.
A Toronto sports blog, where unabashed homerism is alive and well...
PLAYOFFS!!!!1
by eyebleaf on Jul 2, 2009 12:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Scott Niedermayer’s $6M doesn’t make the money list? Maybe I misunderstand…
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Jul 2, 2009 1:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And Sedin²’s not there either…
Honk if you love Justice!
"I'm betting that I'm just abnormal enough to survive. "
by TheTick on Jul 2, 2009 5:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sedins were pre-noon.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there)
by Doogie2K on Jul 2, 2009 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I see how this is. So it’s a list of important signings in the NHL excluding the pacific time zone. So typical.
*cries*http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Jul 2, 2009 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Poor Earl. Don’t cry.
/pats him consolingly on the shoulder
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on Jul 2, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Niedermayer was a UFA in name-only … he really wasn’t going anywhere else and there was no intrigue involved in the signing. I included him in the total dollar figure at the top, but that’s it.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jul 2, 2009 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Hossa one still gives me the giggles.
(843): the red head has a bf
(1-843): just because there's a goalie doesn't mean u can't score
by wrap around curl on Jul 2, 2009 2:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I will laugh in glee when they lose one of Kane, Toews, or Keith next year.
"Life is just a place where we spend time between games. Hockey is where we live, where we can best meet and overcome pain and wrong and death." - Fred Shero
by Karina on Jul 2, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not gonna happen, unless it’s for one of those 4-draft-pick RFA offers. There seems to be no shortage of suckers who’ll take a campbell off their hands.
it’ll be secondary players like Fugly (3 million!), Sharp (3.9m), Bolland (3.375), Ladd (RFA next summer), or Brouwer/Versteeg/Barker (Current RFAs).
by passive_voice on Jul 2, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There seems to be no shortage of suckers who’ll take a campbell off their hands.
If the cap ceiling stagnates or goes south next summer, it may become exactly that: a shortage of suckers.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
by Earl Sleek on Jul 2, 2009 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I took a pretty good look at next year’s salary cap situation for the Blackhawks. At least 2 of Versteeg/Barker/Toews/Kane/Keith is gone. Its highly likely that 3 of them are.
Kris Versteeg and Cam Barker need new deals this offseason, and franchise stars Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews, and Duncan Keith all need them the next year. Either of Kane or Toews will easily command 5M/yr, and that would probably be below market value. Even signing one of those two for 5M/yr would push the cap situation to 16.5M to sign 10 players. If you sign both of Kane and Toews to the same deal, its 11.5M to sign 9 players to fill out the gameday roster. And that’s being generous in that the cap doesn’t go down at all, and that those two would take discounted contracts on their first chance to earn big money. If they each want 6M, you’re down to 9.5M to sign 9 players. That means almost every replacement would have to be making near league minimums.
http://sacrificethebody.blogspot.com/
Sacrifice the Body - Examining the NHL through statistical analysis, reasoned thought, and blind conjecture.
by IAmJoe on Jul 2, 2009 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
James,
Any idea how many of the contracts had NM/NT clauses? That would be a very interesting tidbit considering the Heatley-Sens soap opera going on at the same time.
by hockeycountry on Jul 2, 2009 4:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Sedins both have NTC’s in their new deals.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on Jul 2, 2009 5:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Komisarek
has a limited NMC in his contract, 12 teams he would not accept a trade to.
"Life is just a place where we spend time between games. Hockey is where we live, where we can best meet and overcome pain and wrong and death." - Fred Shero
by Karina on Jul 2, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m sure a lot of them did. This info doesn’t come out all that often until afterward.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jul 2, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It makes me sad that ...
we still have an NHL where Donald Brashear will make more money than a useful player with a Cup like Sami Pahlsson.
by colonial.red on Jul 2, 2009 5:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Opps
Misread the cap number. $2.65 PER isn’t a bad deal for Pahlsson.
by colonial.red on Jul 2, 2009 5:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that’s a good deal for Sami. Kinda wish the Sabres had gone for it but who knows if he even wanted to come here.
Honk if you love Justice!
"I'm betting that I'm just abnormal enough to survive. "
by TheTick on Jul 2, 2009 5:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was sad to see Gio go,
but at 5 mil per, he’s yours.
by Mandmeisterx on Jul 2, 2009 5:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Regards to Ohlund
Are you kidding? This is horrible! You don’t give an aging vet like that a seven-year deal. Tampa Bay has obviously learned nothing from their foul-up last year.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!
by R_Adragna on Jul 2, 2009 6:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The duration of the contract is just to drive down the annual cap hit. No one’s expecting him to play out the full seven years (the contract is front-loaded). Because he’s under 35 they’re not on the hook for anything if he gets injured or retires, so it’s actually not that bad of a deal for Tampa.
"Without good hard work, it is impossible to reach the pinnacle of success." - Anatoli Tarasov
by PRC on Jul 2, 2009 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I said this yesterday in the Hossa thread – the easiest way to close this loophole is to make any over-35 years in a multi-year UFA contract guaranteed against the cap, whether they are 35 before they sign it or not. That would put a de facto limit of 7-8 years on the majority of UFA deals, unless you get someone like JayBo who is UFA at 25.
by Afino on Jul 2, 2009 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed on closing the loophole as well – i said this on a Stanley Cup of Chowder bruins thread yesterday -
"
The front loaded contracts have several benefits – it has nothing to do with cap hit (kind of) or the buyout. it is all about attracting/rewarding a player to your team with a ton of cash up front.
- prior to the CBA, GMs would lure marquis player with several years at rich money. now, with the CBA, the rich teams offer front loaded contracts to give rich, guaranteed money to players in the first several years. it is basically a way of the GM acknowledging how much they value a player and want his services.
- as usual, the cap hit stands as the contract terms divided by the # of years. as long as the player starts that season in which he signs prior to turning 35 and retires before the deal finishes there is no salary cap hit charged for the unplayed years. (that is where the lower avg cap hit helps)
- so GMs thought of using front loaded contracts in the new CBA era to attract top tier players to their team with guaranteed high dollar per year structured contracts.
- it is only recently with some of the new front loaded contracts on what have been deemed 2nd tier players, ie) johan franzen in DET, have they come under scrutiny."
by hockeysully on Jul 2, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno, I’ve been scrutinizing these long-term deals forever.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jul 2, 2009 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s because you’re smarter than the average bear hockey executive.
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on Jul 2, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And then of course the big problem is, a team that has a specific PAYROLL cap (read: small market teams like Buffalo) can’t afford to blow up to 15 to 20% of their cash cap on one player. I use Buffalo because I know them (obviously), and it was a big deal in the case of the Vanek offer sheet that the actual salary in the first year was $10 million – 20% of the Sabres’ cash cap. Salary cap and self-imposed payroll cap are two completely different things. The loophole is resulting in the same situation as pre-lockout.
by Afino on Jul 2, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah James – I was talking the average hockey guy!
correct afino – even with the ‘loophole’, only rich teams can afford to frontload the contract.
by hockeysully on Jul 2, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Chris Neil turn down 2 yrs @ $1.75M per?
So Murray turns around and says, “I’ll not only bump you up 14%, but double the term”?
At least Mike Fisher doesn’t lose his golf buddy, and what makes Fisher happy, makes Carrie Underwood happy…and she makes me happy by just being her here.
Now the B’s can bring on Lucic, cuz dressing Cody Bass six times a year isn’t necessarily the way to go.
by TD O'Dell on Jul 2, 2009 6:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Anyone else think Heatley's being a tool?
Honestly, who’s going to want him after the stunt he’s pulling? He wants a trade and then turns down the trade he’s offered because he’s “blindsided” by it. Boo-hoo, Dany. Rumor has it that you’re a man and a professional. Suck it up and live up to the contract you signed.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
by gotsparkly on Jul 2, 2009 7:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
First he wants out of Ottawa, then he doesn’t want to leave unless it’s the perfect situation for him – he seems to be pouting like a toddler because he isn’t getting his way. Time to grow up, Dany.
(Also, I love the caption on the picture at the top of the post.) :-)
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on Jul 2, 2009 7:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it bad if I suggest he be put in the Play-Pens with Crosby?
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
by gotsparkly on Jul 2, 2009 7:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think so. I don’t expect professional athletes to be paragons of virtue, or all very nice and compassionate individuals, or brilliant raconteurs – but I do expect them to be able to act professionally in public and be civil to people (not necessarily nice, but civil).
(Off-topic, but that’s probably what annoyed me the most about Barry Bonds. He didn’t have to be a wonderful, smiling, accessible personality, but would it have killed him not to act like a surly jackass with a corncob up his butt? All he had to do was be civil to the public and he wouldn’t have been nearly as hated. I wonder if he wasn’t just too dumb to figure that out.)
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on Jul 2, 2009 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because Crosby has twice demanded trades despite long-term contracts, and then vetoed the results when he didn’t like them?
Oh, no, it’s because Flyer, Ranger and Capital fans like to call Crosby a whiner, therefore he is.
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Jul 2, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um, if 59% of the players of the league vote Crosby the whiniest player, therefore he’s somehow not because you’re a Pens fan (I assume?)
Yeeaaaah, it’s not confined to the fans.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
by gotsparkly on Jul 4, 2009 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shifting deck chairs...
So the Rangers parted with one insanely bloated contract for another? Meanwhile Bob gainey who helped out poor old Glen shifted the deck chairs on his Titanic. No better or worse, just different name plates in the dressing room
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else
by Fauxrumors on Jul 2, 2009 7:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know about Gainey
I’d call swapping out Plekanec and Koivu for Gomez and Cammalleri as his top two centres, more than than just shifting deck chairs.
Whether his ship is sinking or not, I couldn’t say, but I would hope that his $13.4M up the middle is better than his $6.4M tandem from last year. He had already replaced Lang with Metropolit in February, so that $3M savings isn’t pertinent to this week’s transactions.
So yeah, he’s overpaying, but centermen seem to be a scarce commodity this year. Who does Slats go with behind Drury? He already said no to Antropov (though Bryan Murray did cave and sign Chris Neil, so you never know). Other than big Nik, his options are down to Koivu and Lang. If he opts for one of those two, then the shifting deck chairs analogy works great for Sather.
by TD O'Dell on Jul 2, 2009 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Rangers contract situation is really interesting, because Gaborik actually isn’t really overpaid – $7.5M seems like much, but he is a player capable of scoring 100 points, especially if he finally gets to play with better offensive players and in a better system than in Minnesota. What makes him overpaid is the comparison with Havlat (same injury risk, $2.5M less) and Hossa (no injury risk, $2.2M less).
by -V- on Jul 2, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you asked 100 knowledgeable hockey people to pick Halvat or Gaborik, both being completely healthy – would it be close? I assume the large majority would take Gaborik. Gaborik v. Hossa – maybe that’s a little closer.
And when you look at Hossa’s deal in comparison to Gaborik’s…Hossa really has 2 contracts. The first 7 years ($53 M/$7.5 per year), and then the last 5 ($9 M/1.8 per year). I think the “value” of these contracts is appropriate for the people involved (assuming each player stayed healthy and played to his max potential).
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://glensathersucks.com/
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
by poploser on Jul 2, 2009 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just wanted to repeat what someone else said above.
James, to paraphrase the old Pensblog quote that was prominently displayed on your old site, your performance yesterday got its own tribe in Africa. Between the site and your Twitter feed, you were pretty much my #1 source for anything that happened yesterday. Bang up job.
by Afino on Jul 2, 2009 7:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually, I noticed it’s still there. And it was Brazil, damnit.
by Afino on Jul 2, 2009 7:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indeed. Wrong season of Survivor.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there)
by Doogie2K on Jul 2, 2009 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had to go to work at 3 p.m., so the updates on the site stopped. Pity, really.
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jul 2, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is $5m/yr just being thrown around like chump change at this point?
Gionta $5m
Havlat $5m
I like these guys, but Gionta hasn’t done really anything amazing in the past 3 years, 50-60pts, 20 goals. I could see him at like $3.75-4m/yr, but not $5m
Havlat is no doubt a talented a guy and he looked good in the playoffs, when he was able to play, but everytime I watch him, I’m thinking about the next hit that is going to put him out for a month or two.
Also – another note of ‘Thank You’ to James yesterday as well. You were on top of everything all day long. I even
e-mailed him a question and he responded in under 5min. Kudos!
by hockeysully on Jul 2, 2009 8:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Gionta’s $5m wasn’t too bad, since that’s the going rate for a legit top-6 forward who can consistently score ~25 goals. However, his term was too long. Five years is a long time to pay a 30 year old at $5m per/year.
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
by bkblades on Jul 2, 2009 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What team improved
I think the real question is how many of these teams improved for all of this spenidng?
Chicago swaps out Havlat, Pahlsson and Habby for Hossa and Madden. Hossa is an upgrade over Havalt, but not a huge differnce versus what they got at least this season, Madden is an upgrade voer Pahlsson but not a big gain, and oh by the way your nubmer one goalie has left and now your playing Huet who you established as less than Habby. Losts of money spent, but an upgrade?
While I used Chicago as any exmaple, lost of other teams seem to be in the same postion. Washington gets Knuble which is good, but they lost Federov, and Kozlov before free agencey, and their biggest issue was a lack of competitiveness on d, somehting they didnt address. Are they a better team now?
Teams with minor moves like Atlanta, now three puck moving defensman including a number one pair D man, tampa getting two new defensman to match with their new draft pick probably added soemthing as it looks like their top 6 Dman are now suddenly legit, though the Ohllund contrac tin its entirity seems a bit much in terms of $ and time. Also St Louis signed their big free agent in the spring, McDonald, securing a number 1 or nubmer 2 center for four years with solid contract $s. They also picked up a nubmer 2 goalie who for a stretch could be a nubmer 1, the latter occuring at just over $1 per for two years, allowing the development of their top goalie prospect Ben Bishop.
by sctlaw on Jul 2, 2009 8:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Don’t forget Chicago also got Kopecky. You don’t consider that a big improvement? :-)
It is an interesting question, though. With players spinning between teams like they are on a demented carousel, it’s hard to figure out where some teams stand with respect to getting better instead of just being different. Chicago is different, Washington is different, Montreal certainly is, so is Toronto.
Calgary, I think, improved just by virtue of establishing a very solid defense. A lot of that hinges on Phaneuf actually playing better this year and the goaltending not being lousy. The Rangers are better if Gaborik doesn’t shatter, I suppose. Minnesota switched one fragile player for another, but I think they improved by getting a coach who will not play such a suffocating (for his own players) defensive system. Hard to say, though, especially with so much stuff still up in the air.
"A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with." -- Tennessee Williams
by Baroque on Jul 2, 2009 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Buffalo may have gotten worse on paper replacing Spacek with Montador. But the thing is – Montador gives something the Sabres don’t have much of – balls. And it’s not like Montador is a statue either. Sure, there’s a worry about if any offense will come from the blueline, but I think it’s overblown as they didn’t have much WITH Spacek last year.
There’s a lot of talk that Zanon would have been an even better choice than Montador, though, especially at the price Zanon signed at.
by Afino on Jul 2, 2009 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you’ll find that the issue of Washington’s competitiveness on D gets addressed through their coaching change rather than a player change so much. Bringing in another D hamstrings them up front, because they’re so close to the cap. If they need to move a player, they’ll do so closer to the deadline.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
by gotsparkly on Jul 2, 2009 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To put the $406 million in perspective...
In using the $406 million number above, it would be interesting to note the total amount available and so be able to look at it as a percentage. I realize some of the inherent difficulties with this, though (i.e., not knowing the cap in years to come)…
by sarah a. on Jul 2, 2009 2:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















