How do you see the Coyotes saga playing out?
We had our windup BBQ last night for my summer league baseball team. Given yesterday's goings on in the Phoenix Coyotes saga, I was not at all surprised to find a long and involved conversation going on about the situation even though this was a gathering of baseball players (and families). What did surprise me is that the Rotary group in the next picnic area joined right in, so in the end we had about 70 people (some -- including my wife -- who do not follow NHL hockey) all championing one view or another.
Eventually our first baseman's daughter asked for predictions (and volunteered to record and tabulate them) of the outcome of the whole situation.
Here they are in no particular order. Vote for your favourite or check "none of the above" and put your prediction in the comments if none of these fit.
(There were other predictions -- two in particular were very funny -- but these got a minimum of 4 votes each.)
This item was created by a member of this blog's community and is not necessarily endorsed by From The Rink.
0 recs |
7 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Meaning no disrespect to Coyote fans, I’d rather like to see Baum award the team to Balsillie, with rights to relocate. The drama that would create would be unbelievable, because I think you can virtually guarantee that such a decision would be appealed right up to the Supreme Court of the US, and hell, probably up the ladder in the Canadian legal system as well, given his desire to move to Hamilton.
Also, and regardless of how it happens, I want to see a second team in the GTA, or in Hamilton, simply to see how much it would upset the apple cart in the area. This would all make for the most entertaining resolution.
Realistically, however, I doubt Baum wants anything to do with the legal hornets nest that he would stir up by siding with Balsillie. He’s got to keep Jim around, but I think there is very little doubt that he desperately wants to see a bidder come forward with an offer that satisfies the creditors and avoids the relocation controversy. Whether Reinsdorf’s bid is that one, nobody but the NHL seems to be certain, and hell, the bid itself is far from certain at this point.
by Resolute on Aug 9, 2009 10:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The first option “JB gets the Coyotes, has to stay in Phoenix this season” cannot happen, for reasons expressed in one of James’ threads. If he wins the team, the arena contract is rejected. They have no place to play.
by Gerald on Aug 9, 2009 11:22 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They could hastily sign a lease at the AWA – its not like they would need a rink with a high capacity. Or, Glendale might even take the pragmatic route and get what money they can. Especially since there would be all kinds of legal maneuviring, appeals, lawsuits and injunctions being pressed.
by Resolute on Aug 9, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Odds are that AWA would have a number of conflicts with existing events, primarily B-ball games. One such conflict would scotch that idea.
by Gerald on Aug 11, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Prediction (it has a long term repercussion):
1) The NHL announces an expansion of the league to 32 teams that will take place before the 2012-13 season. The league stipulates that one team will be in the USA and one in Canada, and that one will be in the Eastern Time zone and one in the Central, Mountain or Pacific time zone.
2) If a team leaves an area without NHL hockey by relocating before 2012, then that city that has been abandoned will be moved to the front of the line for an expansion team. The team’s nickname and history will become property of the NHL so that if the expansion puts a team in that location, they will pick up the history. This way, if Phoenix relocates, the NHL would put a new team in 2012-13 into the Phoenix area and they could reuse the Coyotes logos, colors, etc. If the Islanders relocate, though, there’s no guarantee of replacement since the NY metro area has two other teams.
This is a “win-win” for a lot of reasons. It gets the 30 current owners some extra $$ from the two expansion fees. It guarantees that there if the current Coyotes leave, they will be reborn from the ashes (like a Phoenix, heh). It also tightens up some of the requirements in that if a group takes the Coyotes and moves them to KC, then the NHL would bring back Phoenix and could add Winnipeg or Hamilton. If the Islanders relocate to Kansas City, then the NHL can add Las Vegas and Hamilton. If the current 30 teams remain as they are, then Hamilton/Kansas City would be the natural additions. Winnipeg would be considered if there is no other acceptable eastern Canada bid.
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Caps on Aug 10, 2009 12:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You lost me at...
expansion. There are too many marginal teams…
by bison on Aug 13, 2009 6:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s never stopped the NHL from expanding before…
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Caps on Aug 24, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















