Ovechkin Suspended Two Games
Busy news day, huh? Here's the official statement:
The National Hockey League announced today that Washington Capitals forward Alex Ovechkin has been suspended for two games, without pay, for a reckless hit on Chicago Blackhawks defenseman Brian Campbell during NHL game #1022, March 14.
Do I win anything for guessing the correct number?
No explanation about comparable hits, previous record, or the like. I do like how they acknowledge that it was a reckless hit rather than an intent to injure (which you could easily argue for Matt Cooke but we'll save that for another time); hopefully Ovechkin learns his lesson and is a little more mindful when he skates into that no-man's land about five feet from the boards.
0 recs |
13 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
I didn’t think it’d be more than 2 games, personally. I find it interesting though because it really didn’t look like a hit from behind and it also didn’t really look like Ovechkin unloaded on him either. I think it was just a string of unfortunate circumstances that led to Campbell getting hurt. Definitely a tough spot for the Blackhawks heading into the playoffs. I mean, guys like Duncan Keith can still pack an offensive punch, but it’s going to make things interesting from hereon in…
Now if Campbell got up without injury, or maybe, say, bruised ribs or something, would this still be a suspension?
Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.
I could describe Max Lapierre’s hit as a string of unfortunate circumstances too.
He got 4 games. The NHL is clueless.
I think the angle of approach has a lot to do with it. Campbell is cutting to turn at an angle and go parallel with the boards, where momentum is taking Nichol on an almost perfectly perpendicular path to the boards.
No denying that the Wheel of Justice has been ridiculously inconsistent, but it’s much more for what they haven’t done this year (Richards, Cooke, Downie, Adams, etc.) than what they have. I’d say they’ve been too reliant on the consequence of the hit helping dictate the punishment, when it really ought to be judged on a hit by hit basis and less the aftermath, but I’m pretty sure Marc Savard would disagree.
Winterion Game Studios
Visit us online at : http://winterion.com
If Campbell had gotten up without injury there would have been nothing. Adams threw a very similar hit on AO earlier in the season but AO got up. Oh well.
Killer_Carlson and Steckel Me Elmo are like brothers to me. And when I say brothers I don't mean like actual brothers. I mean it like how black people use it, which is more meaningful, I think.
by Fehr and Balanced on Mar 15, 2010 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions
So you want hockey to become a no contact sport?
re: " hopefully Ovechkin learns his lesson and is a little more mindful when he skates into that no-man’s land about five feet from the boards."
Watch the replay it’s a shove, not a hit and Ovie shves Campbel as they cross the goal line. In a regulation NHL rink that line is suppossed to be 11 feet from the boards. It wasn’t reckless, sorry, it was an accident. As a Caps and Ovie fan today and a fan of the sport and the NHL for 40 years, I only hope this pacification movement around the NHL just comes to an end quikly. It will change the fundemental fiber of the game for sure and the way it will drive it won’t be a good direction in my opinion.
First we Americans ruined our own sport – American Football – by trying to make everything politicaly correct. That ended in an epic fail – the NFL game is entirely horrible to watch live in the stadium, yet off the field the players, literally at times “rape and pillage” so they are horrible role models.
Now we want one of the hardest working and most talented players in the game to “let up” and play with sensible caution. That’s not the role model we want our kids to have is it seriously? “Kids, play hard but not too hard. Remeber it’s not whether you win or loose it’s just so eveyone has a fun time and doesn’t get hurt. Also remember, no matter who wins as long as no one gets hurt the coaches will take everyone out for ice cream.”
I mean we wouldn’t want sports to teach our kids how to compete to win fairly and as hard as possible. We’d rather sit here in opur politically correct self – satisified stupor. Meanwhile the kids from the developing world wil become the driven adults of the future and we can squander our position as world leaders. We can also watch an NHL game where we can rest comfortably because the risk of injury will be no greater than that of ice dancing or curling.
by markbona-capsfan99 on Mar 15, 2010 6:16 PM CDT reply actions
I’ve played hockey in some form for about 15 years, including being on the ice for the past ten. Even though I play at a low low low low level, there are ways to plays aggressive and ways to play dangerous. You have the mindfulness to back off in certain situations so that you don’t wind up breaking someone’s neck.
Let’s take the puck out of this and look at it solely from the position of hitting. If Ovechkin gets another step or two and can get the angle on Campbell, then drive him shoulder to shoulder into the boards. It’s a devastating hit, a clean play, and Campbell gets the wind knocked out of him at most. There’s no immediate threat of flying headfirst into the boards.
Or he backs off and simply lets the play continue until a more appropriate time pops up. It’s just about having that sensibility to realize that there is a small region where the opposing player is vulnerable to severe injury.
by Mike Chen on Mar 15, 2010 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Doesn’t the opposing player bear some responsability to keep himself out of vulnerable positions? Ocho didn’t come out of nowhere on that play. Knowing full well that Ocho was bearing down on him, Campbell should not have free reign. That risk that Campbell to is part of the game. When Ocho is bearing down on you it is probably wise to brace for impact instead of expecting a clear path to the puck.
Also, I echo the sentiments above about not wanting hockey to go the way of football.
And what would people be saying about Campbell if he had decided to brace for the hit rather than playing the puck? He’d have been crucified if it had turned into a Washington goal. People want it both ways, but they can’t have it.
by J. Michael Neal on Mar 17, 2010 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions
The NHL got it right...
For once. Everyone had to know it wasn’t going to be more than two games because of the involved party. Now if only there was some consistency…
Blueshirt Banter - End the Sather Era
US Soccer - The Yanks Are Coming
Red Sox Fan behind Enemy lines.
My question
Is Seidenberg’s (spelling?) hit tonight on Parise also worth 5 and a game + 2 suspended? His hit on Parise was just as illegal (in terms of checking from behind), closer to the boards, and a harder hit than Ovechkin’s. Is Campbell going to start doing that for all checks on the back of shoulders?
What about yesterday’s Blues game where Schultz got called for “hooking” even though he cross checked a guy into the boards from the side of the goal – after the whistle? Is that 5 and a game + 2 suspended?
Obviously, neither of those were even called (or called correctly on the second one) as it goes…but what’s the shake-out of this suspension call?
I can’t find the Schulz hit, so I won’t comment. Seidenberg’s hit was from the side, not behind. In terms of effect, the huge difference is that the way Seidenberg hit him caused Parise to fall backwards and go into the boards feet first. That can damage a leg badly, but the reason checking from behind is considered so dangerous is that the recipient of the hit almost always falls forward, leading to an unacceptably high probability of hitting the boards headfirst. The worst possible scenario there is that the player hits the dasher with his chin. This is what happened to Travis Roy, albeit from losing his balance rather than being checked.
Personally, I’d like to get rid of checking during a race for the puck. I thought that it was definitely interference, but they don’t call the rule the way I’d like. Basically, I’d like to do away with checking in situations where it is going to lead to a high speed collision with the boards. You could call it charging, too, given that many of these hits take place while skating full speed.
by J. Michael Neal on Mar 16, 2010 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions
NHL...from the rink or from the ring?
Good hit – Bad hit.
NHL get real. Bodychecks, yes! Ultimate fighting…???
Let’s not over- analyze this.
If you have ever played hockey you have a pretty good take on what an elbow to the head of a guy, who is not looking and going in about the opposite direction to you, will accomplish. If you don’t, think of yourself (or an NHL higher up perhaps) getting hit by a 200 pound baseball bat in the head.
You should also have a pretty good idea of what a push, trip or hip will do to a guy heading full tilt towards the boards. If not , and you want the rush, jump off your roof head first (Or think of whoever gave Ovie a 2 game suspension jumping off).
Ovie 2 vs Lapierre (who?) 4. Advantage Alex. Same crime, but Ovie is a little faster so he KOs his man, not the $ame time. Leave it to the NHL to put a $ value on justice.
Hockey is a fast game. Pro hockey players have reflexes that allow them to make decisions at speeds we can’t possibly imagine. Do you really believe that there are ‘’unintended or accidental hits’’ of this type?
These kinds of hits: HEAD or Boarding from behind are a disgrace to hockey. But, I guess since ultimate fighting has a big share of the US market, the NHL brains are thinking that this kind of aberation is a step in the right direction.
Bring back the game!!!
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 


















